Motion compensation using origin ensembles in awake small animal positron emission tomography

In emission tomographic imaging, the stochastic origin ensembles algorithm provides unique information regarding the detected counts given the measured data. Precision in both voxel and region-wise parameters may be determined for a single data set based on the posterior distribution of the count density allowing uncertainty estimates to be allocated to quantitative measures. Uncertainty estimates are of particular importance in awake animal neurological and behavioral studies for which head motion, unique for each acquired data set, perturbs the measured data. Motion compensation can be conducted when rigid head pose is measured during the scan. However, errors in pose measurements used for compensation can degrade the data and hence quantitative outcomes. In this investigation motion compensation and detector resolution models were incorporated into the basic origin ensembles algorithm and an efficient approach to computation was developed. The approach was validated against maximum liklihood-expectation maximisation and tested using simulated data. The resultant algorithm was then used to analyse quantitative uncertainty in regional activity estimates arising from changes in pose measurement precision. Finally, the posterior covariance acquired from a single data set was used to describe correlations between regions of interest providing information about pose measurement precision that may be useful in system analysis and design. The investigation demonstrates the use of origin ensembles as a powerful framework for evaluating statistical uncertainty of voxel and regional estimates. While in this investigation rigid motion was considered in the context of awake animal PET, the extension to arbitrary motion may provide clinical utility where respiratory or cardiac motion perturb the measured data.

[1]  R. Huesman A new fast algorithm for the evaluation of regions of interest and statistical uncertainty in computed tomography. , 1984, Physics in medicine and biology.

[2]  Roger Fulton,et al.  An Event-Driven Motion Correction Method for Neurological PET Studies of Awake Laboratory Animals , 2008, Molecular Imaging and Biology.

[3]  S Stute,et al.  GATE V6: a major enhancement of the GATE simulation platform enabling modelling of CT and radiotherapy , 2011, Physics in medicine and biology.

[4]  Jinyi Qi,et al.  A unified noise analysis for iterative image estimation. , 2003, Physics in medicine and biology.

[5]  I. Weir Fully Bayesian Reconstructions from Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography Data , 1997 .

[6]  Jeffrey A. Fessler Mean and variance of implicitly defined biased estimators (such as penalized maximum likelihood): applications to tomography , 1996, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[7]  E. Levitan,et al.  A Maximum a Posteriori Probability Expectation Maximization Algorithm for Image Reconstruction in Emission Tomography , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[8]  Ronald J. Jaszczak,et al.  Fully Bayesian estimation of Gibbs hyperparameters for emission computed tomography data , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[9]  R. F. Wagner,et al.  Objective assessment of image quality. II. Fisher information, Fourier crosstalk, and figures of merit for task performance. , 1995, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[10]  Sam Beddar,et al.  Evaluation of a stochastic reconstruction algorithm for use in Compton camera imaging and beam range verification from secondary gamma emission during proton therapy , 2012, Physics in medicine and biology.

[11]  Donald W. Wilson,et al.  Noise properties of the EM algorithm. I. Theory , 1994 .

[12]  A Sitek,et al.  Representation of photon limited data in emission tomography using origin ensembles , 2008, Physics in medicine and biology.

[13]  A J Reader,et al.  Statistical list-mode image reconstruction for the high resolution research tomograph. , 2004, Physics in medicine and biology.

[14]  Andre Kyme,et al.  Tracking and characterizing the head motion of unanaesthetized rats in positron emission tomography , 2012, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[15]  D. W. Scott,et al.  Multivariate Density Estimation, Theory, Practice and Visualization , 1992 .

[16]  A J Reader,et al.  List-mode-based reconstruction for respiratory motion correction in PET using non-rigid body transformations , 2007, Physics in medicine and biology.

[17]  H.H. Barrett,et al.  Model observers for assessment of image quality , 1993, 2002 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[18]  Georgios I. Angelis,et al.  Full field spatially-variant image-based resolution modelling reconstruction for the HRRT , 2015, 2012 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference Record (NSS/MIC).

[19]  Arkadiusz Sitek,et al.  Evaluation of Imaging Systems Using the Posterior Variance of Emission Counts , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[20]  Lucas C. Parra,et al.  List-Mode Likelihood EM Algorithm and Noise Estimation Demonstrated on 2D-PET , 1998, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[21]  Georgios I. Angelis,et al.  Efficient time-weighted sensitivity image calculation for motion compensated list mode reconstruction , 2014, 2014 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference (NSS/MIC).

[22]  J. Berger Statistical Decision Theory and Bayesian Analysis , 1988 .

[23]  Yusheng Li,et al.  Noise propagation for iterative penalized-likelihood image reconstruction based on Fisher information , 2011, Physics in medicine and biology.

[24]  L. Shepp,et al.  Maximum Likelihood Reconstruction for Emission Tomography , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[25]  Arkadiusz Sitek,et al.  Data analysis in emission tomography using emission-count posteriors , 2012, Physics in medicine and biology.

[26]  N. Metropolis,et al.  Equation of State Calculations by Fast Computing Machines , 1953, Resonance.

[27]  K. Lange,et al.  EM reconstruction algorithms for emission and transmission tomography. , 1984, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[28]  David W. Scott,et al.  Multivariate Density Estimation: Theory, Practice, and Visualization , 1992, Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics.

[29]  D. Rubin,et al.  Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM - algorithm plus discussions on the paper , 1977 .

[30]  A. Celler,et al.  Fast image reconstruction for Compton camera using stochastic origin ensemble approach. , 2010, Medical physics.

[31]  A. Rahmim,et al.  Motion compensation in histogram-mode and list-mode EM reconstructions: beyond the event-driven approach , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[32]  Andre Kyme,et al.  The effect of time domain pose filtering on accuracy of small marker based motion correction in awake animal PET , 2011, 2011 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[33]  Jeffrey A. Fessler,et al.  Efficient calculation of resolution and covariance for penalized-likelihood reconstruction in fully 3-D SPECT , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[34]  B. Tsui,et al.  Noise properties of the EM algorithm: II. Monte Carlo simulations. , 1994, Physics in medicine and biology.

[35]  Roger Fulton,et al.  The design and implementation of a motion correction scheme for neurological PET. , 2003, Physics in medicine and biology.

[36]  P Solevi,et al.  Simulated one-pass list-mode: an approach to on-the-fly system matrix calculation , 2013, Physics in medicine and biology.

[37]  R. Carson A Maximum Likelihood Method for Region-of-Interest Evaluation in Emission Tomography , 1986, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[38]  Clive Baldock,et al.  Optimised Motion Tracking for Positron Emission Tomography Studies of Brain Function in Awake Rats , 2011, PloS one.

[39]  Arkadiusz Sitek,et al.  Time-of-flight PET image reconstruction using origin ensembles , 2015, Physics in medicine and biology.