Adjuvant radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy after surgery for uterine carcinosarcoma.

BACKGROUND Uterine carcinosarcomas are uncommon with about 35% not confined to the uterus at diagnosis. The survival of women with advanced uterine carcinosarcoma is poor with a pattern of failure indicating greater likelihood of upper abdominal and distant metastatic recurrence. OBJECTIVES To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of adjuvant radiotherapy and/or systemic chemotherapy in the management of uterine carcinosarcoma. SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Gynaecological Cancer Group Trials Register, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), 2012, Issue 10, MEDLINE and EMBASE up to November 2012. We also searched registers of clinical trials, abstracts of scientific meetings, reference lists of included studies and contacted experts in the field. SELECTION CRITERIA Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing adjuvant radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy in women with uterine carcinosarcoma. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors independently abstracted data and assessed risk of bias. Hazard ratios (HRs) for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) and risk ratios (RRs) comparing adverse events in women who received radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy were pooled in random-effects meta-analyses. MAIN RESULTS Three trials met the inclusion criteria and these randomised 579 women, of whom all were assessed at the end of the trials. Two trials assessing 373 participants with stage III to IV persistent or recurrent disease, found that women who received combination therapy had a significantly lower risk of death and disease progression than women who received single agent ifosfamide, after adjustment for performance status (HR = 0.75, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.60 to 0.94 and HR = 0.72, 95% CI: 0.58 to 0.90 for OS and PFS respectively). There was no statistically significant difference in all reported adverse events, with the exception of nausea and vomiting, where significantly more women experienced these ailments in the combination therapy group than the Ifosamide group (RR = 3.53, 95% CI: 1.33 to 9.37).In one trial there was no statistically significant difference in the risk of death and disease progression in women who received whole body irradiation and chemotherapy, after adjustment for age and FIGO stage (HR = 0.71, 95% CI: 0.48 to 1.05 and HR = 0.79, 95% CI: 0.53 to 1.18 for OS and PFS respectively). There was no statistically significant difference in all reported adverse events, with the exception of haematological and neuropathy morbidities, where significantly less women experienced these morbidities in the whole body irradiation group than the chemotherapy group (RR= 0.02, 95% CI: 0.00 to 0.16) for haematological morbidity and all nine women in the trial experiencing neuropathy morbidity were in the chemotherapy group). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS In advanced stage metastatic uterine carcinosarcoma as well as recurrent disease adjuvant combination, chemotherapy with ifosfamide should be considered. Combination chemotherapy with ifosfamide and paclitaxel is associated with lower risk of death compared with ifosfamide alone. In addition, radiotherapy to the abdomen is not associated with improved survival.

[1]  R. Mannel,et al.  Phase II evaluation of paclitaxel and carboplatin in the treatment of carcinosarcoma of the uterus: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. , 2010, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[2]  S. Pecorelli Revised FIGO staging for carcinoma of the vulva, cervix, and endometrium , 2009 .

[3]  A. Lopes,et al.  Evaluation of prognostic factors and treatment outcomes in uterine carcinosarcoma. , 2009, European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology.

[4]  M. Franchi,et al.  Phase III randomised study to evaluate the role of adjuvant pelvic radiotherapy in the treatment of uterine sarcomas stages I and II: an European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Gynaecological Cancer Group Study (protocol 55874). , 2008, European journal of cancer.

[5]  Douglas G. Altman,et al.  Statistical Methods for Examining Heterogeneity and Combining Results from Several Studies in Meta‐Analysis , 2008 .

[6]  Douglas G. Altman,et al.  Systematic Reviews in Health Care: Meta-Analysis in Context: Second Edition , 2008 .

[7]  A. Wolfson,et al.  A gynecologic oncology group randomized phase III trial of whole abdominal irradiation (WAI) vs. cisplatin-ifosfamide and mesna (CIM) as post-surgical therapy in stage I-IV carcinosarcoma (CS) of the uterus. , 2007, Gynecologic oncology.

[8]  B. Monk,et al.  Phase III trial of ifosfamide with or without paclitaxel in advanced uterine carcinosarcoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. , 2007, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[9]  D. Miller,et al.  Phase II evaluation of topotecan in carcinosarcoma of the uterus: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. , 2005, Gynecologic oncology.

[10]  A. Chetrit,et al.  A comparison between different postoperative treatment modalities of uterine carcinosarcoma. , 2005, Gynecologic oncology.

[11]  G. Sutton,et al.  Adjuvant ifosfamide and cisplatin in patients with completely resected stage I or II carcinosarcomas (mixed mesodermal tumors) of the uterus: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. , 2005, Gynecologic oncology.

[12]  G. Matsunaga,et al.  Clinical experience with combination paclitaxel and carboplatin therapy for advanced or recurrent carcinosarcoma of the uterus. , 2004, Gynecologic oncology.

[13]  J. Thigpen,et al.  Cisplatin as initial chemotherapy in ovarian carcinosarcomas: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. , 2004, Gynecologic oncology.

[14]  M. Zhan,et al.  Surveillance, epidemiology, and end results analysis of 2677 cases of uterine sarcoma 1989-1999. , 2004, Gynecologic oncology.

[15]  D. Altman,et al.  Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses , 2003, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[16]  R. Broaddus,et al.  A phase II trial of cisplatin, ifosfamide, and mesna in patients with advanced or recurrent uterine malignant mixed müllerian tumors with evaluation of potential molecular targets. , 2003, Gynecologic oncology.

[17]  W. McCluggage,et al.  Uterine carcinosarcomas (malignant mixed Mullerian tumors) are metaplastic carcinomas , 2002, International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer.

[18]  R. Burger,et al.  Phase II evaluation of oral trimetrexate in mixed mesodermal tumors of the uterus: a gynecologic oncology group study. , 2002, Gynecologic oncology.

[19]  L. Ramondetta,et al.  Malignant mixed Müllerian tumors of the uterus: analysis of patterns of failure, prognostic factors, and treatment outcome. , 2001, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[20]  J. Curtin,et al.  Paclitaxel in the treatment of carcinosarcoma of the uterus: a gynecologic oncology group study. , 2001, Gynecologic oncology.

[21]  T. Le Adjuvant pelvic radiotherapy for uterine carcinosarcoma in a high risk population. , 2001, European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology.

[22]  G. Sutton,et al.  A phase III trial of ifosfamide with or without cisplatin in carcinosarcoma of the uterus: A Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. , 2000, Gynecologic oncology.

[23]  A. Elbendary,et al.  Co-expression of p53 by epithelial and stromal elements in carcinosarcoma of the female genital tract: an immunohistochemical study of 19 cases. , 1999, International journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society.

[24]  M. Parmar,et al.  Extracting summary statistics to perform meta-analyses of the published literature for survival endpoints. , 1998, Statistics in medicine.

[25]  H. Ball,et al.  A phase II trial of amonafide in patients with mixed mesodermal tumors of the uterus: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. , 1998, American journal of clinical oncology.

[26]  M. Sherman,et al.  Evidence for a common etiology for endometrial carcinomas and malignant mixed mullerian tumors. , 1998, Gynecologic oncology.

[27]  A. Gadducci,et al.  Carcinosarcoma of the uterus: a clinicopathological multicenter CTF study. , 1997, Gynecologic oncology.

[28]  S D Walter,et al.  The results of direct and indirect treatment comparisons in meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. , 1997, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[29]  P. Saigo,et al.  The role of whole-pelvic irradiation in the treatment of early-stage uterine carcinosarcoma. , 1997, Gynecologic oncology.

[30]  M. Maiman,et al.  Uterine carcinosarcomas: incidence and trends in management and survival. , 1997, Gynecologic oncology.

[31]  J. Soper,et al.  Phase II trial of hydroxyurea, dacarbazine (DTIC), and etoposide (VP-16) in mixed mesodermal tumors of the uterus: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. , 1996, Gynecologic oncology.

[32]  P. Schwartz,et al.  A phase II study of etoposide, cisplatin, and doxorubicin chemotherapy in mixed müllerian tumors (MMT) of the uterus. , 1995, Gynecologic oncology.

[33]  J. Baak,et al.  The effect of chemotherapy on the different components of advanced carcinosarcomas (malignant mixed mesodermal tumors) of the female genital tract , 1993, International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer.

[34]  E. Yordan,et al.  Prognostic factors in early‐stage uterine sarcoma: A gynecologic oncology group study , 1993, Cancer.

[35]  J. Dunn,et al.  Leiomyosarcomas have a poorer prognosis than mixed mesodermal tumours when adjusting for known prognostic factors: the result of a retrospective study of 423 cases of uterine sarcoma , 1992 .

[36]  B. Scheithauer,et al.  Clinicopathologic analysis of uterine malignant mixed müllerian tumors. , 1989, Gynecologic oncology.

[37]  J. Shepherd Revised FIGO staging for gynaecological cancer , 1989, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[38]  P. Disaia,et al.  Phase II trial of ifosfamide and mesna in mixed mesodermal tumors of the uterus (a Gynecologic Oncology Group study). , 1989, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[39]  N. Laird,et al.  Meta-analysis in clinical trials. , 1986, Controlled clinical trials.

[40]  N. Weiss,et al.  The epidemiology of sarcomas of the uterus. , 1986, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[41]  M. Zile,et al.  Influence of dietary retinyl acetate on normal rat mammary gland development and on the enhancement of 7,12-dimethylbenz[a]anthracene-induced rat mammary tumorigenesis by high levels of dietary fat. , 1986, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[42]  C. Mangan,et al.  A randomized clinical trial of adjuvant adriamycin in uterine sarcomas: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. , 1985, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[43]  C. Percy,et al.  Cancer incidence and mortality in the United States, 1973-77. , 1981, National Cancer Institute monograph.

[44]  V. Livolsi,et al.  Malignant mixed müllerian tumors of the uterus: A clinicopathologic assessment of 34 cases , 1979, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[45]  F. Askin,et al.  Effects of irradiation on mixed müllerian tumors of the uterus , 1979, Cancer.

[46]  M. Feldstein,et al.  Uterine sarcomas. Analysis of failures with special emphasis on the use of adjuvant radiation therapy , 1978, Cancer.

[47]  Sherif A El-Nashar,et al.  Uterine carcinosarcoma. , 2011, Clinical obstetrics and gynecology.

[48]  K. Godfrey,et al.  Adjuvant radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy after surgery for uterine carcinosarcoma. , 2011, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[49]  A. Gadducci,et al.  The prognostic relevance of histological type in uterine sarcomas: a Cooperation Task Force (CTF) multivariate analysis of 249 cases. , 2002, European journal of gynaecological oncology.

[50]  L. Peters,et al.  Patterns of recurrence in malignant mixed müllerian tumor of the uterus , 1986, Cancer.

[51]  Josef Korinek,et al.  Proceedings of the American Society of Clinical Oncology , 1982 .