Using the NIH Toolbox in special populations

Background: In order to develop health outcomes measures that are relevant and applicable to the general population, it is essential to consider the needs and requirements of special subgroups, such as the young, elderly, disabled, and people of different ethnic and cultural backgrounds, within that population. Methods: The NIH Toolbox project convened several working groups to address assessment issues for the following subgroups: pediatric, geriatric, cultural, non–English-speaking, and disabled. Each group reviewed all NIH Toolbox instruments in their entirety. Results: Each working group provided recommendations to the scientific study teams regarding instrument content, presentation, and administration. When feasible and appropriate, instruments and administration procedures have been modified in accordance with these recommendations. Conclusion: Health outcome measurement can benefit from expert input regarding assessment considerations for special subgroups.

[1]  N. Fox,et al.  Assessment of neurological and behavioural function: the NIH Toolbox , 2010, The Lancet Neurology.

[2]  B. Altman,et al.  Convergence and divergence: differences in disability prevalence estimates in the United States and Canada based on four health survey instruments. , 2009, Social science & medicine.

[3]  Jennifer M. Hootman,et al.  Prevalence and most common causes of disability among adults--United States, 2005. , 2009, MMWR. Morbidity and mortality weekly report.

[4]  S. Knox,et al.  Methodological issues related to longitudinal epidemiological assessment of developmental trajectories in children , 2008, Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health.

[5]  Mauricio L Barreto,et al.  JECH: new editorial directions , 2008, Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health.

[6]  M. Prince.  Measurement validity in cross-cultural comparative research , 2008, Epidemiologia e Psichiatria Sociale.

[7]  J. Manly,et al.  Deconstructing Race and Ethnicity: Implications for Measurement of Health Outcomes , 2006, Medical care.

[8]  David Cella,et al.  A Comprehensive Method for the Translation and Cross-Cultural Validation of Health Status Questionnaires , 2005, Evaluation & the health professions.

[9]  D. Cella,et al.  Multilingual translation of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT) quality of life measurement system , 1996, Quality of Life Research.

[10]  D. Cella,et al.  Developing and evaluating cross-cultural instruments from minimum requirements to optimal models , 1993, Quality of Life Research.

[11]  C. McHorney.  Ten Recommendations for Advancing Patient-Centered Outcomes Measurement for Older Persons , 2003, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[12]  David Cella,et al.  Health outcomes assessment in vulnerable populations: measurement challenges and recommendations. , 2003, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[13]  O. Strickland.  Cultural Considerations and Issues in Measurement , 2003, Journal of Nursing Measurement.

[14]  J. Helms,et al.  Guidelines on Multicultural Education, Training, Research, Practice, and Organizational Change for Psychologists. , 2003, The American psychologist.

[15]  A. Naeim,et al.  Geriatric syndromes and assessment in older cancer patients. , 2001, Oncology.

[16]  R. Sachdeva,et al.  Health Status of Children with Special Health Care Needs: Measurement Issues and Instruments , 1999, Clinical pediatrics.

[17]  David Cella,et al.  Using cross-cultural input to adapt the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) scales. , 1999, Acta oncologica.

[18]  D. Cella,et al.  Spanish language translation and initial validation of the functional assessment of cancer therapy quality-of-life instrument. , 1998, Medical care.

[19]  Nan D. Hunter.  Quality first: better health care for all Americans. , 1998, The Kansas nurse.

[20]  D. Reuben,et al.  The performance of simple instruments in detecting geriatric conditions and selecting community-dwelling older people for geriatric assessment. , 1997, Age and ageing.

[21]  R. Dana.  Culturally competent assessment practice in the United States. , 1996, Journal of personality assessment.