Novel Inhibitor Discovery through Virtual Screening against Multiple Protein Conformations Generated via Ligand-Directed Modeling: A Maternal Embryonic Leucine Zipper Kinase Example
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Erin S. Bolstad,et al. In pursuit of virtual lead optimization: The role of the receptor structure and ensembles in accurate docking , 2008, Proteins.
[2] Tomonaga Ozawa,et al. The importance of CH/pi hydrogen bonds in rational drug design: An ab initio fragment molecular orbital study to leukocyte-specific protein tyrosine (LCK) kinase. , 2008, Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry.
[3] Yusuke Nakamura,et al. Involvement of maternal embryonic leucine zipper kinase (MELK) in mammary carcinogenesis through interaction with Bcl-G, a pro-apoptotic member of the Bcl-2 family , 2007, Breast Cancer Research.
[4] J Andrew McCammon,et al. Target flexibility in molecular recognition. , 2005, Biochimica et biophysica acta.
[5] David P. Davis,et al. Maternal embryonic leucine zipper kinase/murine protein serine-threonine kinase 38 is a promising therapeutic target for multiple cancers. , 2005, Cancer research.
[6] Mindy I. Davis,et al. A quantitative analysis of kinase inhibitor selectivity , 2008, Nature Biotechnology.
[7] Cristiano R. W. Guimaraes,et al. Understanding the Impact of the P-loop Conformation on Kinase Selectivity , 2011, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[8] Woody Sherman,et al. ConfGen: A Conformational Search Method for Efficient Generation of Bioactive Conformers , 2010, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[9] N. Gray,et al. Targeting cancer with small molecule kinase inhibitors , 2009, Nature Reviews Cancer.
[10] P. Cohen,et al. The selectivity of protein kinase inhibitors: a further update. , 2007, The Biochemical journal.
[11] Yan Li,et al. Discovery of Novel Checkpoint Kinase 1 Inhibitors by Virtual Screening Based on Multiple Crystal Structures , 2011, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[12] S. Dimitrov,et al. Benzo[e]pyridoindoles, novel inhibitors of the Aurora kinases , 2009, Cell cycle.
[13] Somesh D. Sharma,et al. Managing protein flexibility in docking and its applications. , 2009, Drug discovery today.
[14] Christopher I. Bayly,et al. Evaluating Virtual Screening Methods: Good and Bad Metrics for the "Early Recognition" Problem , 2007, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[15] Matthew P. Repasky,et al. Glide: a new approach for rapid, accurate docking and scoring. 1. Method and assessment of docking accuracy. , 2004, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[16] Lisa Yan,et al. Fully Automated Molecular Mechanics Based Induced Fit Protein-Ligand Docking Method , 2008, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[17] Jung-Hsin Lin,et al. The relaxed complex method: Accommodating receptor flexibility for drug design with an improved scoring scheme. , 2003, Biopolymers.
[18] E. Jaeger,et al. Comparison of automated docking programs as virtual screening tools. , 2005, Journal of Medicinal Chemistry.
[19] I. Bahar,et al. The intrinsic dynamics of enzymes plays a dominant role in determining the structural changes induced upon inhibitor binding , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[20] Evan Bolton,et al. An overview of the PubChem BioAssay resource , 2009, Nucleic Acids Res..
[21] Ben M. Webb,et al. Comparative Protein Structure Modeling Using Modeller , 2006, Current protocols in bioinformatics.
[22] J. Irwin,et al. Benchmarking sets for molecular docking. , 2006, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[23] C. Chennubhotla,et al. Intrinsic dynamics of enzymes in the unbound state and relation to allosteric regulation. , 2007, Current opinion in structural biology.
[24] Richard A. Lewis,et al. Lessons in molecular recognition: the effects of ligand and protein flexibility on molecular docking accuracy. , 2004, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[25] S. Teague. Implications of protein flexibility for drug discovery , 2003, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.
[26] Simona Distinto,et al. Evaluation of the performance of 3D virtual screening protocols: RMSD comparisons, enrichment assessments, and decoy selection—What can we learn from earlier mistakes? , 2008, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..
[27] D. Rognan,et al. Protein-based virtual screening of chemical databases. 1. Evaluation of different docking/scoring combinations. , 2000, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[28] Mengang Xu,et al. Utilizing Experimental Data for Reducing Ensemble Size in Flexible-Protein Docking , 2012, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[29] Elizabeth Yuriev,et al. Challenges and advances in computational docking: 2009 in review , 2011, Journal of molecular recognition : JMR.
[30] William L. Jorgensen,et al. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling , 2005, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[31] Ajay N. Jain,et al. Parameter estimation for scoring protein-ligand interactions using negative training data. , 2006, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[32] Stefan Knapp,et al. Synthesis, kinase inhibitory potencies, and in vitro antiproliferative evaluation of new Pim kinase inhibitors. , 2009, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[33] Gerhard Klebe,et al. Molecular Docking Screens Using Comparative Models of Proteins , 2009, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[34] N. Gray,et al. Rational design of inhibitors that bind to inactive kinase conformations , 2006, Nature chemical biology.
[35] R. Friesner,et al. Novel procedure for modeling ligand/receptor induced fit effects. , 2006, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[36] J. Bajorath,et al. Quo vadis, virtual screening? A comprehensive survey of prospective applications. , 2010, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[37] Michele Parrinello,et al. Locating binding poses in protein-ligand systems using reconnaissance metadynamics , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[38] Woody Sherman,et al. Improving database enrichment through ensemble docking , 2008, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..
[39] Xiang-Qun Xie,et al. Exploiting PubChem for virtual screening , 2010, Expert opinion on drug discovery.
[40] J. Mccammon,et al. Computational drug design accommodating receptor flexibility: the relaxed complex scheme. , 2002, Journal of the American Chemical Society.
[41] Paul S Mischel,et al. Maternal embryonic leucine zipper kinase is a key regulator of the proliferation of malignant brain tumors, including brain tumor stem cells , 2008, Journal of neuroscience research.
[42] S. Bryant,et al. PubChem as a public resource for drug discovery. , 2010, Drug discovery today.
[43] G. G. Stokes. "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.
[44] Jonathan W. Essex,et al. Ensemble Docking into Multiple Crystallographically Derived Protein Structures: An Evaluation Based on the Statistical Analysis of Enrichments , 2010, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[45] In-Hee Park,et al. Dynamic ligand-induced-fit simulation via enhanced conformational samplings and ensemble dockings: a survivin example. , 2010, The journal of physical chemistry. B.
[46] A. Camargo,et al. Maternal embryonic leucine zipper kinase transcript abundance correlates with malignancy grade in human astrocytomas , 2008, International journal of cancer.
[47] Thierry Langer,et al. The Protein Data Bank (PDB), its related services and software tools as key components for in silico guided drug discovery. , 2008, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[48] Albert C. Pan,et al. Pathway and mechanism of drug binding to G-protein-coupled receptors , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[49] Bernd Wendt,et al. Capturing Structure-Activity Relationships from Chemogenomic Spaces , 2011, J. Chem. Inf. Model..