Integrating MOOCs in Regular Higher Education: Challenges and Opportunities from a Scandinavian Perspective

MOOCs are increasingly being considered by universities as an integral part of their curriculum. Nevertheless, there are several challenges that to some extent slow this process, where the most important one is the accreditation challenges and financing. These challenges are particularly important in the context of universities in Scandinavian countries where education is mostly free. In order to gain more insights on the status of proliferation of MOOCs in Scandinavian universities and understand any specific challenges, we conducted a study by analyzing two sources of data: research publications and university websites. Further on, these data have been analyzed using a framework that differentiates and categorizes MOOCs in terms of accreditation and scalability. As a result of this analysis, we have identified the remaining challenges as well as a number of opportunities regarding the full integration of MOOCs in the educational system of the Scandinavian Higher Education Institutions.

[1]  C. Sinclair,et al.  Teacher Experiences and Academic Identity: The Missing Components of MOOC Pedagogy , 2014 .

[2]  Dan Yngve Jacobsen,et al.  Dropping Out or Dropping In? A Connectivist Approach to Understanding Participants’ Strategies in an e-Learning MOOC Pilot , 2019, Technol. Knowl. Learn..

[3]  Shirley Williams,et al.  MOOCs: A systematic study of the published literature 2008-2012 , 2013 .

[4]  Blaženka Divjak,et al.  Use of MOOCs in Traditional Classroom: Blended Learning Approach , 2018 .

[5]  Anne-Mette Nortvig,et al.  Blending MOOC in Face-to-Face Teaching and Studies , 2016 .

[6]  Lule Ahmedi,et al.  Rethinking the conventional learning paradigm towards MOOC based flipped classroom learning , 2017, 2017 16th International Conference on Information Technology Based Higher Education and Training (ITHET).

[7]  Mie Buhl,et al.  A Danish international MOOC in professional care education: - MOOC case study for eASEM project , 2015 .

[8]  Arne Martin Fevolden,et al.  Massive, Open, Online, and National? A Study of How National Governments and Institutions Shape the Development of MOOCs , 2017 .

[9]  Halvdan Haugsbakken,et al.  Introducing Blended Learning MOOC - A Study of One bMOOC in Norwegian Teacher Education , 2016, SaITE.

[10]  Mie Buhl,et al.  MOOCs beyond the c- and x-divide - the relevance of a social constructivist approach , 2015 .

[11]  Per Ödling,et al.  Using MOOCs at Learning Centers in Northern Sweden , 2015 .

[12]  Maria Joseph Israel,et al.  Effectiveness of integrating MOOCs in traditional classrooms for undergraduate students , 2015 .

[13]  Wenbin Li,et al.  Research on the reform of flipped classroom in computer science of university based on SPOC , 2017, 2017 12th International Conference on Computer Science and Education (ICCSE).

[14]  Carlos Delgado Kloos,et al.  Flipping the classroom to improve learning with MOOCs technology , 2017, Comput. Appl. Eng. Educ..

[15]  Hossain Shahriar,et al.  Comparing MOOC-based platforms: Reflection on pedagogical support, framework and learning analytics , 2015, 2015 International Conference on Collaboration Technologies and Systems (CTS).

[16]  Sule Yildirim Yayilgan,et al.  Towards Understanding the MOOC Trend: Pedagogical Challenges and Business Opportunities , 2016, HCI.