Distinct element simulation of lugged wheel performance under extraterrestrial environmental effects

Abstract Lunar regolith demonstrates a high angle of internal friction due to particle angularity and apparent cohesion due to interparticle short-range interaction in lunar environment. This paper investigates the mobility of lunar rovers under partial gravity. A high-efficient contact model of lunar regolith that fuses rolling resistance and van der Waals forces was employed in the distinct element analyses of model wheel tests. Soil behavior and wheel performance under an extraterrestrial environment were analyzed in comparison with that under a terrestrial environment. Results indicate that van der Waals forces enhance the macroscopic shear strength of lunar soils particularly under low confining pressures associated with microgravity conditions. In the extraterrestrial environment, the mobility of a lugged wheel becomes not as well as expected due to more slippage and sinkage than that in the terrestrial environment, while it moves more efficiently in view of tractive efficiency. Increased slip ratio and sinkage on the lunar surface are attributed to loosely packing of soil particles in microgravity conditions, where reduced wheel load plays only minor role in improving the mobility of the wheel. Van der Waals forces between soil grains are beneficial to the wheel performance due to increased strength in soils, while this contribution is overwhelmed by the effect of largely reduced confining pressure in soils due to partial gravity on the Moon.

[1]  Otis R. Walton,et al.  Adhesion of Lunar Dust , 2013 .

[2]  Mingjing Jiang,et al.  An Experimental Investigation on the Mechanical Behavior Between Cemented Granules , 2012 .

[3]  C. A. Pearse.  Photometry and polarimetry of the moon and their relationship to physical properties of the lunar surface , 1963 .

[4]  Serge Leroueil,et al.  Insight into shear strength functions of unsaturated granulates by DEM analyses , 2004 .

[5]  P. Cundall,et al.  A discrete numerical model for granular assemblies , 1979 .

[6]  Serge Leroueil,et al.  A simple and efficient approach to capturing bonding effect in naturally microstructured sands by discrete element method , 2007 .

[7]  Guilhem Mollon,et al.  Generating realistic 3D sand particles using Fourier descriptors , 2013 .

[8]  A. Tordesillas,et al.  Incorporating rolling resistance and contact anisotropy in micromechanical models of granular media , 2002 .

[9]  James K. Mitchell,et al.  Soil mechanical properties at the Apollo 14 site , 1972 .

[10]  S. Luding.  Cohesive, frictional powders: contact models for tension , 2008 .

[11]  Toshitsugu Tanaka,et al.  3-D DEM simulation of cohesive soil-pushing behavior by bulldozer blade , 2012 .

[12]  Kiyoshi Omine,et al.  Mobility performance of a rigid wheel in low gravity environments , 2010 .

[13]  John F. Peters,et al.  A poly‐ellipsoid particle for non‐spherical discrete element method , 2009 .

[14]  J. Israelachvili.  Intermolecular and surface forces , 1985 .

[15]  Hai-Sui Yu,et al.  A novel discrete model for granular material incorporating rolling resistance , 2005 .

[16]  Akira Murakami,et al.  Distinct element method analyses of idealized bonded-granulate cut slope , 2012, Granular Matter.

[17]  J. Y. Wong,et al.  Predicting the performances of rigid rover wheels on extraterrestrial surfaces based on test results obtained on earth , 2012 .

[18]  Guy T. Houlsby,et al.  DEM Modelling of Elastic Adhesive Particles with Application to Lunar Soil , 2012 .

[19]  J. Gaier,et al.  Evaluation of Surface Modification as a Lunar Dust Mitigation Strategy for Thermal Control Surfaces , 2011 .

[20]  Yong Huang,et al.  Trafficability analysis of lunar mare terrain by means of the discrete element method for wheeled rover locomotion , 2010 .

[21]  Jian Fei Chen,et al.  Assessment of rolling resistance models in discrete element simulations , 2011 .

[22]  M. Lankton,et al.  Lunar Regolith Geotechnical Properties: Implications for Exploration , 2006 .

[23]  W. D. Carrier,et al.  Particle Size Distribution of Lunar Soil , 2003 .

[24]  Leonard D. Jaffe,et al.  Shear strength of lunar soil from oceanus procellarum , 1973 .

[25]  Colin Thornton,et al.  Microscopic contact model of lunar regolith for high efficiency discrete element analyses , 2013 .

[26]  P. A. Cundall,et al.  FORMULATION OF A THREE-DIMENSIONAL DISTINCT ELEMENT MODEL - PART I. A SCHEME TO DETECT AND REPRESENT CONTACTS IN A SYSTEM COMPOSED OF MANY POLYHEDRAL BLOCKS , 1988 .

[27]  Hiroshi Shimizu,et al.  Discrete element method analysis of single wheel performance for a small lunar rover on sloped terrain , 2010 .

[28]  Serge Leroueil,et al.  An efficient technique for generating homogeneous specimens for DEM studies , 2003 .

[29]  Mohammad Hossein Abbaspour-Fard,et al.  Modeling nonspherical particles using multisphere discrete elements , 2001 .

[30]  W. W. Brixius,et al.  Traction prediction equations for bias ply tires , 1987 .

[31]  Ching S. Chang,et al.  Model for Granular Materials with Surface Energy Forces , 2007 .

[32]  G. McDowell,et al.  The importance of modelling ballast particle shape in the discrete element method , 2006 .

[33]  A. Yu,et al.  Discrete particle simulation of particulate systems: Theoretical developments , 2007 .

[34]  P. Cundall.  A computer model for simulating progressive, large-scale movements in blocky rock systems , 1971 .

[35]  Peter J. Bosscher,et al.  DEM simulation of granular media—structure interface: effects of surface roughness and particle shape , 1999 .

[36]  Koon Meng Chua,et al.  Properties and Mechanics of the Lunar Regolith , 1993 .

[37]  Jin Y. Ooi,et al.  Establishing predictive capabilities of DEM – Verification and validation for complex granular processes , 2013 .

[38]  R. F. Scott.  Twenty-seventh Rankine Lecture: failure , 1987 .

[39]  Itzhak Shmulevich,et al.  PREDICTING SOIL-RIGID WHEEL PERFORMANCE USING DISTINCT ELEMENT METHODS , 2006 .

[40]  R. Sullivan,et al.  Discrete element modeling of a Mars Exploration Rover wheel in granular material , 2012 .

[41]  Hehua Zhu,et al.  Contact behavior of idealized granules bonded in two different interparticle distances: An experimental investigation , 2012 .

[42]  Hiroshi Nakashima,et al.  Parametric analysis of lugged wheel performance for a lunar microrover by means of DEM , 2007 .

[43]  P. Cundall,et al.  A bonded-particle model for rock , 2004 .

[44]  Hiroshi Nakashima,et al.  Experimental validation of distinct element simulation for dynamic wheel-soil interaction , 2007 .

[45]  Howard A. Perko,et al.  Surface Cleanliness Effect on Lunar Soil Shear Strength , 2001 .

[46]  M. Oda,et al.  Rolling Resistance at Contacts in Simulation of Shear Band Development by DEM , 1998 .

[47]  Hai-Sui Yu,et al.  Discrete element modelling of deep penetration in granular soils , 2006 .

[48]  Mingjing Jiang,et al.  Interaction between Lugged Wheel of Lunar Rover and Lunar Soil by DEM with a New Contact Model , 2012 .

[49]  Peter Eberhard,et al.  A bonded-particle model for cemented sand , 2013 .

[50]  Guy T. Houlsby,et al.  A new algorithm for contact detection between convex polygonal and polyhedral particles in the discrete element method , 2012 .

[51]  A. Adamson.  Physical chemistry of surfaces , 1960 .

[52]  Mingjing Jiang,et al.  Properties of TJ-1 Lunar Soil Simulant , 2012 .

[53]  Runyu Yang,et al.  Discrete particle simulation of particulate systems: A review of major applications and findings , 2008 .

[54]  P. Cundall,et al.  FORMULATION OF A THREE-DIMENSIONAL DISTINCT ELEMENT MODEL - PART II. MECHANICAL CALCULATIONS FOR MOTION AND INTERACTION OF A SYSTEM COMPOSED OF MANY POLYHEDRAL BLOCKS , 1988 .

[55]  John T Harvey,et al.  Polyarc discrete element for efficiently simulating arbitrarily shaped 2D particles , 2012 .