Product Launch in a Declining Environment:The Blu-ray Disc – Opportunities and Struggle

Increasingly ICT-based virtual products are challenging physical products and markets. Obsolescence has become a real effect for an augmented number of established industries due to the facilitation of access, consumption, and permanent, immediate availability, which dematerialised products provide. Once again, Schumpeter’s Wind of Creative Destruction intensifies organisations’ permanent struggle for survival (1950). This paper presents long-term research in the optical disc industry, which has presented the optical disc format of Blu-ray as its latest innovation. It is an example of how an established industry launches a new product for finding new opportunities, but fights desperately against market resistance. The degree of innovation, the Blu-ray represents, may not be sufficient in the overarching battle of the physical place versus the virtual space (Kotler et al. 2002, Lam. 2004, Lamont et al. 1993, Scardigli et al. 1988). As the US market research institute In-Stat highlights, the optical disc market has declined for the 10th year in sequence (Kaufhold. 2010, IFPI. 2010). Sufficient evidence is available that the replication industry of optical discs may be confronted with an endgame scenario. The market climate may already be too hostile to support this industry’s desire for a renewal of consumers’ acceptance of the physical product, here the Blu-ray disc, and to create new market opportunities in the struggle against the industry’s potential obsolescence (Harrigan et al. 1983). Despite strong efforts of promotion and powerful market approaches, the Blu-ray disc could not find inroads to markets yet making this format sustainably successful. Evidence is that after a short period of time, Blu-ray discs’ available manufacturing capacities outperform consumers’ demand by >30%, consumer and replication prices fall sharply and many of the Home Entertainment’s content providers have little or no use for this format being a commodity and based on mass production (dvd-intelligence. 2010a, Kaufhold. 2010, Killer-Korff. 2010). Therefore, as research among the replication industry indicates, it presently seems more as though the Blu-ray format may not fulfil this industry’s needs and, with reference to Abernathy et al.’s research, may not lead to the renewal of industrial dynamics in a declining marketplace (1983, 1984). Further explanation for reasons can be found in the theories of innovation based on Utterback’s, Christensen’s and Christensen et al.’s studies of disruptive and discontinuous innovation (1996, 2003, 2003, 2004). Following the paper presented at the Sixteenth Annual South Dakota International Business Conference, this paper presents research about the Blu-ray format’s market problems. The introduction of the Transilience Organisation Innovation Map provided a conceptual approach for the initial explanation of the underlying reasons (Oestreicher. 2009). Research among European replication firms since concludes for Blu-ray that innovation in technology alone is not sufficient, when innovation’s second stream of market linkages is involved (Abernathy et al. 1983, 1984). The paper presents explanations, why the Blu-ray disc may not be sufficiently strong to support the replication industry in overcoming the odds impacting their strategic opportunities in a declining and eventually disruptive environment (Lamont et al. 1993, Yoo. 1992). The research methods applied are grounded theory and case study (Goulding. 2002, Charmaz. 2009, Eisenhardt. 1989, Davies. 2006). The overall intention of this long-term research is to contribute to a theory, which may also be relevant for other industries, like the publishing industry, whose struggle against dematerialisation of content is presently starting (Picard. 2003). Key Words: Radical vs. marginal innovation, Ideal Final Result, endgame strategies, theories of innovation, Blu-ray

[1]  Richard A. D'Aveni,et al.  Hypercompetition: Managing the Dynamics of Strategic Maneuvering , 1994 .

[2]  K. Dinnie ‘Brand leadership’ , 2000 .

[3]  George Stalk,et al.  Harvard business review on strategies for growth , 1998 .

[4]  W. Abernathy Innovation : Mapping the winds of creative destruction * , 2003 .

[5]  K. Eisenhardt Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[6]  Xavier Lecocq,et al.  La dynamique des réponses stratégiques des majors au changement institutionnel dans l'industrie de la musique , 2007 .

[7]  R. Picard Cash Cows or Entrecôte: Publishing Companies and Disruptive Technologies , 2003 .

[8]  Thomas K. McCraw,et al.  Prophet of Innovation: Joseph Schumpeter and Creative Destruction , 2007 .

[9]  W. Kim,et al.  Value innovation: the strategic logic of high growth. , 1997, Harvard business review.

[10]  G. S. Alʹtshuller,et al.  And Suddenly the Inventor Appeared: TRIZ, the Theory of Inventive Problem Solving , 1996 .

[11]  C. Oliver STRATEGIC RESPONSES TO INSTITUTIONAL PROCESSES , 1991 .

[12]  C. Clarke,et al.  Hypercompetition—Managing the dynamics of strategic manoeuvring , 1995 .

[13]  Richard Whittington,et al.  Exploring Corporate Strategy , 1988 .

[14]  JinSoo Yoo Production Capacity and Patterns of Exit in Declining Industries , 1992 .

[15]  Michael E. Porter,et al.  End-game Strategies for Declining Industries , 1989 .

[16]  J. Schumpeter Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy , 1943 .

[17]  M. Assink Inhibitors of disruptive innovation capability: a conceptual model , 2006 .

[18]  Victor Scardigli,et al.  Toward Digital Man , 1988 .

[19]  J. Hoffman,et al.  COMPETITIVE DECISION MAKING IN DECLINING INDUSTRIES , 1993 .

[20]  Entrepreneurial Strategy: Emerging Businesses in Declining Industries , 2006 .

[21]  Kevin F. Kelly New Rules for the New Economy , 1998 .

[22]  Clayton M. Christensen,et al.  Seeing What's Next: Using the Theories of Innovation to Predict Industry Change , 2005 .

[23]  Klaus Oestreicher,et al.  The Music Industry & Its Consumers:A Potential Divorce through Technology and Shifting Market Linkages? , 2009 .

[24]  Robert J. Rodin,et al.  Free, Perfect, and Now: Connecting to the Three Insatiable Customer Demands: A CEO's True Story , 1999 .

[25]  Anthony W. Ulwick What Customers Want: Using Outcome-Driven Innovation to Create Breakthrough Products and Services , 2005 .

[26]  Johannes Leo,et al.  Book reviewCompetitive strategy: Techniques for analysing industries and competitors : Porter, Michael E. Free Press (Macmillan), New York, 396 pages, $17.95 , 1982 .

[27]  M. Porter From Competitive Advantage to Corporate Strategy , 1989 .

[28]  Christina Goulding Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide for Management, Business and Market Researchers , 2002 .

[29]  Darrell Mann,et al.  Hands-on systematic innovation , 2002 .

[30]  R. Grant Contemporary Strategy Analysis , 2005 .

[31]  Clayton M. Christensen,et al.  Reinventing Your Business Model , 2008 .

[32]  G. Johnson Managing strategic change--strategy, culture and action. , 1992, Long range planning.

[33]  K. Clark,et al.  Industrial renaissance : producing a competitive future for America , 1983 .

[34]  Philip Kotler,et al.  Brand Sense: Build Powerful Brands through Touch, Taste, Smell, Sight, and Sound , 2005 .

[35]  E. Brink,et al.  Constructing grounded theory : A practical guide through qualitative analysis , 2006 .

[36]  Klaus Oestreicher,et al.  Segmentation & the Jobs-to-be-done theory: A Conceptual Approach to Explaining Product Failure , 2009 .

[37]  James M. Utterback,et al.  Mastering the Dynamics of Innovation , 1996 .

[38]  M. Lindstrom Brand Sense: How to Build Powerful Brands Through Touch, Taste, Smell, Sight and Sound , 2006 .

[39]  J. Kohnen,et al.  Blue Ocean Strategy: How to Create Uncontested Market Space and Make the Competition Irrelevant , 2006 .

[40]  M. Prensky Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants , 2001 .

[41]  Clayton M. Christensen The Innovator's Dilemma , 1997 .