Measuring the intrinsic impacts of arts attendance

Understanding the value of the arts to individuals, families and communities has long been a query for policy-makers and researchers. At the core of the value system is how individuals are affected and transformed by virtue of participating. Individual arts experiences are the building blocks upon which the larger outcomes of the arts, such as social cohesion and cognitive development, are constructed. Tools for effectively measuring how art affects audiences, however, are just being explored. Anecdotal stories of impact provide helpful information. But as arts groups are called upon to provide more rigorous evidence of the impacts of their artistic programmes, a more systematic measurement approach is needed to convey the intrinsic value of their work. This article reviews initial exploratory research and subsequent research undertaken over the past six years to better understand how art affects audiences, and to develop reliable and replicable measurement approaches. The research has yielded a more nuanced, but still emergent, understanding of the emotional, intellectual, social and aesthetic constructs of intrinsic impact, methods of measuring them, and insight into the limitations and applications of this work for policy-makers and arts practitioners.

[1]  B. Walmsley Why people go to the theatre: a qualitative study of audience motivation , 2011 .

[2]  L. Kriesberg Local government and the arts. , 1983 .

[3]  Eleonora Belfiore,et al.  Beyond the “Toolkit Approach”: Arts Impact Evaluation Research and the Realities of Cultural Policy‐Making , 2010 .

[4]  Jennifer Radbourne,et al.  Measuring the intrinsic benefits of arts attendance , 2010 .

[5]  Kevin F. McCarthy,et al.  Gifts of the muse : reframing the debate about the benefits of the arts , 2004 .

[6]  N. Kreitman INTRINSIC AESTHETIC VALUE REVISTED , 2011 .

[7]  Eleonora Belfiore,et al.  The social impact of the arts : an intellectual history , 2008 .

[8]  C. Gray COMMODIFICATION AND INSTRUMENTALITY IN CULTURAL POLICY , 2007 .

[9]  Juan Mateos-Garcia,et al.  Beyond Live: digital innovation in the performing arts , 2010 .

[10]  Alan S. Brown,et al.  Assessing the intrinsic impacts of a live performance , 2008 .

[11]  Robert D. Putnam,et al.  Bowling alone: the collapse and revival of American community , 2000, CSCW '00.

[12]  Eleonora Belfiore,et al.  Determinants of Impact: Towards a Better Understanding of Encounters with the Arts , 2007 .

[13]  Paul DiMaggio,et al.  Arts participation as cultural capital in the United States, 1982–2002: Signs of decline? , 2004 .

[14]  Andrew Pinnock John Holden's Capturing Cultural Value: How Culture has Become a Tool of Government Policy , 2005 .

[15]  K. Jinnett,et al.  A new framework for building participation in the arts , 2001 .

[16]  R. E. Robinson,et al.  The art of seeing : an interpretation of the aesthetic encounter , 1993 .

[17]  David O'Brien,et al.  Measuring the value of culture: a report to the Department for Culture Media and Sport , 2010 .