Modulating fluid intelligence performance through combined cognitive training and brain stimulation

ABSTRACT It is debated whether cognitive training of specific executive functions leads to far transfer effects, such as improvements in fluid intelligence (Gf). Within this context, transcranial direct current stimulation and recently also novel protocols such as transcranial random noise and alternating current stimulation are being investigated with regards to their ability to enhance cognitive training outcomes. We compared the effects of four different transcranial electrical brain stimulation protocols in combination with nine daily computerized training sessions on Gf. 82 participants were randomly assigned to receive transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), random noise stimulation (tRNS), multifocal alternating current stimulation at 40 Hz (mftACS), or multifocal tDCS (mftDCS) in combination with an adaptive and synergistic executive function (EF) training, or to a no‐contact control group. EF training consisted of gamified tasks drawing on isolated as well as integrated executive functions (working memory, inhibition, cognitive flexibility). Transfer was assessed with a combined measure of Gf including three established tests (Bochumer Matrizentest ‐ BOMAT, Raven's Advanced Progressive Matrices ‐ RAPM, and Sandia Matrices). We found significant improvements in Gf for the tDCS, mftDCS, and tRNS groups when compared with the no‐contact group. In contrast, the mftACS group did not improve significantly and showed a similar pattern as the no‐contact group. Mediation analyses indicated that the improvement in Gf was mediated through game progression in the mftDCS and tRNS group. Electrical brain stimulation in combination with sustained EF training can lead to transfer effects in Gf, which are mediated by training progression. HighlightsCognitive training combined with tES leads to far transfer effects on Gf.tDCS, tRNS, and mftDCS were similarly effective.mftACS showed a similar pattern as the no‐contact group.Improvement in Gf was mediated through training progression in mftDCS and tRNS.

[1]  Andrew R. A. Conway,et al.  Journal of Experimental Psychology : General Neural Mechanisms of Interference Control Underlie the Relationship Between Fluid Intelligence and Working Memory Span , 2011 .

[2]  T. Bliss,et al.  Plasticity in the human central nervous system. , 2006, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[3]  Michael Scharkow,et al.  The Relative Trustworthiness of Inferential Tests of the Indirect Effect in Statistical Mediation Analysis , 2013, Psychological science.

[4]  A. Diamond.  Executive functions. , 2014, Handbook of clinical neurology.

[5]  Bernhard Hommel,et al.  Intelligence and cognitive flexibility: Fluid intelligence correlates with feature “unbinding” across perception and action , 2006, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[6]  Giulio Ruffini,et al.  The electric field in the cortex during transcranial current stimulation , 2013, NeuroImage.

[7]  Walter Paulus,et al.  Outlasting excitability shifts induced by direct current stimulation of the human brain. , 2004, Supplements to Clinical neurophysiology.

[8]  Alvaro Pascual-Leone,et al.  Is neuroenhancement by noninvasive brain stimulation a net zero-sum proposition? , 2014, NeuroImage.

[9]  N. Taatgen.  The nature and transfer of cognitive skills. , 2013, Psychological review.

[10]  Thomas S. Redick,et al.  Working Memory Training Does Not Improve Performance on Measures of Intelligence or Other Measures of “Far Transfer” , 2016, Perspectives on Psychological Science.

[11]  R. Cohen Kadosh,et al.  Combining brain stimulation and video game to promote long-term transfer of learning and cognitive enhancement , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[12]  C. Miniussi,et al.  Non-linear effects of transcranial direct current stimulation as a function of individual baseline performance: Evidence from biparietal tDCS influence on lateralized attention bias , 2015, Cortex.

[13]  Alexander Strobel,et al.  No evidence for true training and transfer effects after inhibitory control training in young healthy adults. , 2014, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[14]  Santosh Mathan,et al.  FAST: A Novel, Executive Function-Based Approach to Cognitive Enhancement , 2019, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[15]  Cyrus K. Foroughi,et al.  Activation and inhibition of posterior parietal cortex have bi-directional effects on spatial errors following interruptions , 2015, Front. Syst. Neurosci..

[16]  Giulio Ruffini,et al.  Multifocal tDCS targeting the resting state motor network increases cortical excitability beyond traditional tDCS targeting unilateral motor cortex , 2017, NeuroImage.

[17]  B. Joe,et al.  Biological Properties of Curcumin-Cellular and Molecular Mechanisms of Action , 2004, Critical reviews in food science and nutrition.

[18]  M. Benedek,et al.  Intelligence, creativity, and cognitive control: The common and differential involvement of executive functions in intelligence and creativity , 2014, Intelligence.

[19]  R. Cattell.  Theory of fluid and crystallized intelligence: A critical experiment. , 1963 .

[20]  G. Thut,et al.  The implications of state-dependent tDCS effects in aging: Behavioural response is determined by baseline performance , 2015, Neuropsychologia.

[21]  Angela R. Laird,et al.  Activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis revisited , 2012, NeuroImage.

[22]  Timothy H. Muller,et al.  Individual differences and specificity of prefrontal gamma frequency-tACS on fluid intelligence capabilities , 2016, Cortex.

[23]  V. Walsh,et al.  Modulating Neuronal Activity Produces Specific and Long-Lasting Changes in Numerical Competence , 2010, Current Biology.

[24]  K. Oberauer,et al.  Effects and mechanisms of working memory training: a review , 2013, Psychological Research.

[25]  R. Cohen Kadosh,et al.  Transfer of Cognitive Training across Magnitude Dimensions Achieved with Concurrent Brain Stimulation of the Parietal Lobe , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[26]  Chi-Hung Juan,et al.  Transcranial direct current stimulation over right posterior parietal cortex changes prestimulus alpha oscillation in visual short-term memory task , 2014, NeuroImage.

[27]  Todd W. Thompson,et al.  Failure of Working Memory Training to Enhance Cognition or Intelligence , 2013, PloS one.

[28]  Todd W. Thompson,et al.  Enhancing cognition using transcranial electrical stimulation , 2015, Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences.

[29]  Raquel E. London,et al.  Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation over Left Dorsolateral pFC on the Attentional Blink Depend on Individual Baseline Performance , 2015, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[30]  W. Wittmann,et al.  Adult Age Differences in Inhibitory Processes and their Predictive Validity for Fluid Intelligence , 2009, Neuropsychology, development, and cognition. Section B, Aging, neuropsychology and cognition.

[31]  F. Wendling,et al.  Transcranial Current Brain Stimulation (tCS): Models and Technologies , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[32]  Thomas S. Redick,et al.  No evidence of intelligence improvement after working memory training: a randomized, placebo-controlled study. , 2013, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[33]  Michael Schneider,et al.  Electrical brain stimulation (tES) improves learning more than performance: A meta-analysis , 2018, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[34]  Laura E. Matzen,et al.  Recreating Raven’s: Software for systematically generating large numbers of Raven-like matrix problems with normed properties , 2010, Behavior research methods.

[35]  Susanne M. Jaeggi,et al.  Short- and long-term benefits of cognitive training , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[36]  David P. MacKinnon,et al.  A General Model for Testing Mediation and Moderation Effects , 2009, Prevention Science.

[37]  M. Berryhill,et al.  tDCS selectively improves working memory in older adults with more education , 2012, Neuroscience Letters.

[38]  O. Tzeng,et al.  Unleashing Potential: Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation over the Right Posterior Parietal Cortex Improves Change Detection in Low-Performing Individuals , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[39]  Susanne M. Jaeggi,et al.  Improving fluid intelligence with training on working memory: a meta-analysis , 2008, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.

[40]  R. Cohen Kadosh,et al.  Can transcranial electrical stimulation improve learning difficulties in atypical brain development? A future possibility for cognitive training , 2013, Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience.

[41]  F. Cicchetti,et al.  Cellular and Molecular Mechanisms of Action of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation: Evidence from In Vitro and In Vivo Models , 2015, International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology.

[42]  R. J. Sternberg.  Intelligence , 1830, The London medical and physical journal.

[43]  Ann Dowker,et al.  Cognitive Enhancement or Cognitive Cost: Trait-Specific Outcomes of Brain Stimulation in the Case of Mathematics Anxiety , 2014, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[44]  Thomas S. Redick,et al.  Is working memory training effective? , 2012, Psychological bulletin.

[45]  Emiliano Santarnecchi,et al.  State-Dependent Effects of Transcranial Oscillatory Currents on the Motor System: What You Think Matters , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[46]  Ralph Morrison,et al.  The Electric Field , 2003 .

[47]  Lucia M. Li,et al.  The contribution of interindividual factors to variability of response in transcranial direct current stimulation studies , 2015, Front. Cell. Neurosci..

[48]  Men-Tzung Lo,et al.  Revealing the brain's adaptability and the transcranial direct current stimulation facilitating effect in inhibitory control by multiscale entropy , 2014, NeuroImage.

[49]  Simon B Eickhoff,et al.  Minimizing within‐experiment and within‐group effects in activation likelihood estimation meta‐analyses , 2012, Human brain mapping.

[50]  Juha Silvanto,et al.  Neural adaptation reveals state‐dependent effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation , 2007, The European journal of neuroscience.

[51]  R. Cohen Kadosh,et al.  Long-Term Enhancement of Brain Function and Cognition Using Cognitive Training and Brain Stimulation , 2013, Current Biology.

[52]  M. Nitsche,et al.  The Importance of Timing in Segregated Theta Phase-Coupling for Cognitive Performance , 2012, Current Biology.

[53]  Andy C. H. Lee,et al.  A Potential Spatial Working Memory Training Task to Improve Both Episodic Memory and Fluid Intelligence , 2012, PloS one.

[54]  A. Antal,et al.  Increasing Human Brain Excitability by Transcranial High-Frequency Random Noise Stimulation , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[55]  V. Romei,et al.  Information-Based Approaches of Noninvasive Transcranial Brain Stimulation , 2016, Trends in Neurosciences.

[56]  Roi Cohen Kadosh,et al.  The effect of transcranial direct current stimulation: a role for cortical excitation/inhibition balance? , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[57]  A. Hayes.  Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach , 2013 .

[58]  Giulio Ruffini,et al.  Optimization of multifocal transcranial current stimulation for weighted cortical pattern targeting from realistic modeling of electric fields , 2014, NeuroImage.

[59]  Laura E. Matzen,et al.  Frequency-Dependent Enhancement of Fluid Intelligence Induced by Transcranial Oscillatory Potentials , 2013, Current Biology.