Collaborative diversity in a nanotechnology innovation system: Evidence from the EU Framework Programme
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] G. Dosi,et al. Technological Paradigms and Trajectories , 2007 .
[2] Wenpin Tsai. Knowledge Transfer in Intraorganizational Networks: Effects of Network Position and Absorptive Capacity on Business Unit Innovation and Performance , 2001 .
[3] Pedro L. Marin,et al. Public Policies Towards Research Joint Venture: Institutional Design and Participants’ Characteristics , 2008 .
[4] Philippe Larédo,et al. The networks promoted by the framework programme and the questions they raise about its formulation and implementation , 1998 .
[5] Ursula Mense-Petermann. Micro-political or inter-cultural conflicts? - An integrating approach , 2006 .
[6] JoAnne Yates,et al. Life in the Trading Zone: Structuring Coordination Across Boundaries in Postbureaucratic Organizations , 2006, Organ. Sci..
[7] Terttu Luukkonen. Technology and market orientation in company participation in the EU framework programme , 2002 .
[8] Steven T. Walsh,et al. Global distribution of micro–nano technology and fabrication centers: A portfolio analysis approach , 2007 .
[9] G. Dosi,et al. The relationships between science, technologies and their industrial exploitation: An illustration through the myths and realities of the so-called ‘European Paradox’ , 2006 .
[10] Katarina Östergren,et al. When Norms Collide: Learning Under Organizational Hypocrisy , 2002 .
[11] Stefan Kuhlmann,et al. Future governance of innovation policy in Europe — three scenarios , 2001 .
[12] W. Powell,et al. Interorganizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology. , 1996 .
[13] Robert H. Kushler,et al. Statistical Computing: An Introduction to Data Analysis Using S-PLUS , 2003, Technometrics.
[14] C. Huxham,et al. Doing things collaboratively: realizing the advantage or succumbing to inertia? , 2004, IEEE Engineering Management Review.
[15] C. Huxham,et al. Ambiguity, Complexity and Dynamics in the Membership of Collaboration , 2000 .
[16] David N. Ku,et al. Intercluster Innovation Differentials: The Role of Research Universities , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.
[17] N. Kastrinos. Issues of exploitation: evaluating the impact of the European community framework programme on European industry , 1994 .
[18] Krsto Pandza,et al. Absorptive and transformative capacities in nanotechnology innovation systems , 2007 .
[19] Morten T. Hansen,et al. The Search-Transfer Problem: The Role of Weak Ties in Sharing Knowledge across Organization Subunits , 1999 .
[20] Sigvald Harryson,et al. Flexibility in innovation through external learning: exploring two models for enhanced industry-university collaboration , 2008, Int. J. Technol. Manag..
[21] Terttu Luukkonen,et al. Additionality of EU framework programmes , 2000 .
[22] Mariano Ruiz Espejo,et al. Review of Statistical computing: An introduction to data analysis using S-PLUS by M. J. Crawley, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester 2002 , 2003 .
[23] Nicholas S. Vonortas,et al. Managing large research partnerships: Examples from the Advanced Technology Program's Information Infrastructure for Healthcare program , 2006 .
[24] European Parliament Resolution on Nanosciences and Nanotechnologies: An Action Plan for Europe 2005–2009 , 2010 .
[25] Alok K. Chakrabarti,et al. Corporate strategic objectives for establishing relationships with university research centers , 2001, IEEE Trans. Engineering Management.
[26] Etienne Wenger,et al. Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .
[27] Michael D. Santoro,et al. Facilitators of Knowledge Transfer in University-Industry Collaborations: A Knowledge-Based Perspective , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.
[28] G. Thoma. Striving for a Large Market: Evidence from a General Purpose Technology in Action , 2008 .
[29] Kumiko Miyazaki,et al. Nanotechnology innovation system: Understanding hidden dynamics of nanoscience fusion trajectories , 2009 .
[30] Keith Pavitt,et al. THE INEVITABLE LIMITS OF EU R&D FUNDING , 1998 .
[31] E. Garnsey,et al. Commercializing Generic Technology: The Case of Advanced Materials Ventures , 2005 .
[32] ST NANO,et al. UNDERSTANDING THE EMERGENCE AND DEPLOYMENT OF " NANO " S , 2009 .
[33] Petr Hanel,et al. Industry–University Collaboration by Canadian Manufacturing Firms* , 2006 .
[34] R. Hogarth,et al. Why Forecasts Fail. What to Do Instead , 2010 .
[35] E. H. Simpson,et al. The Interpretation of Interaction in Contingency Tables , 1951 .
[36] Roberto Verganti,et al. Designing foresight studies for Nanoscience and Nanotechnology (NST) future developments , 2008 .
[37] Jyoti S. A. Bhat,et al. Concerns of new technology based industries: The case of nanotechnology. , 2005 .
[38] Daniele Archibugi,et al. International partnerships for knowledge in business and academia: A comparison between Europe and the USA , 2004 .
[39] Christopher Palmberg,et al. Transferring science-based technologies to industry: Does nanotechnology make a difference? , 2010 .
[40] Fiona E. Murray. Innovation as co-evolution of scientific and technological networks: exploring tissue engineering , 2002 .
[41] Steven T. Walsh,et al. A theory of innovation for process-based innovations such as nanotechnology , 2008 .
[42] Terttu Luukkonen,et al. The difficulties in assessing the impact of EU framework programmes , 1998 .
[43] G. Ahuja. Collaboration Networks, Structural Holes, and Innovation: A Longitudinal Study , 1998 .
[44] Toke Bjerregaard. Industry and academia in convergence: Micro-institutional dimensions of R&D collaboration , 2010 .
[45] A. Meyer,et al. Management of an international network of industrial R&D laboratories , 1993 .
[46] B. Clarysse,et al. Regional cohesion in Europe? An analysis of how EU public RTD support influences the techno-economic regional landscape , 2001 .
[47] Arvind Parkhe,et al. Institutional environments, institutional change and international alliances , 2003 .
[48] Sally Davenport,et al. Collaborative research programmes: building trust from difference , 1998 .
[49] Ronald N. Kostoff,et al. Global nanotechnology research literature overview , 2007 .
[50] Jacky F. L. Hong,et al. Conflicting Identities and Power Between Communities of Practice: The Case of IT Outsourcing , 2009 .
[51] Vincent Mangematin,et al. Understanding the emergence and deployment of “nano” S&T , 2007, 0911.3323.
[52] Steven T. Walsh,et al. AN INTRODUCTION TO NANOTECHNOLOGY POLICY: OPPORTUNITIES AND CONSTRAINTS FOR EMERGING AND ESTABLISHED ECONOMIES , 2007 .
[53] L. Welch,et al. The importance of language in international knowledge transfer , 2008 .
[54] Kumiko Miyazaki,et al. An empirical analysis of nanotechnology research domains , 2010 .
[55] Stefan Kuhlmann,et al. Across institutional boundaries?: Research collaboration in German public sector nanoscience , 2008 .
[56] Arvind Parkhe,et al. Orchestrating Innovation Networks , 2006 .
[57] N. Arranz,et al. Joint R&D projects: Experiences in the context of European technology policy , 2006 .
[58] T. Shinn,et al. Paths of commercial knowledge: Forms and consequences of university–enterprise synergy in scientist-sponsored firms , 2006 .
[59] David G. Sirmon,et al. A model of cultural differences and international alliance performance , 2004 .
[60] A. Porter,et al. Nanopatenting patterns in relation to product life cycle , 2007 .
[61] W. A. Lucas,et al. Best Practices for Industry-University Collaboration , 2010 .
[62] Alok K. Chakrabarti,et al. FIRM SIZE AND TECHNOLOGY CENTRALITY IN INDUSTRY-UNIVERSITY INTERACTIONS , 2002 .
[63] A. V. D. Ven,et al. A Collective Action Model of Institutional Innovation , 2006 .