Collaborative diversity in a nanotechnology innovation system: Evidence from the EU Framework Programme

Collaborative diversity is, arguably, an intrinsic characteristic of research networks built on the emergence of general-purpose technologies such as nanotechnology. European research policy, epitomised in Framework Programmes, creates arrangements that institutionalise the development of internationally and institutionally diverse research networks. Motivated by concerns that a high degree of collaborative diversity may create managerial challenges for network members in sharing knowledge across national and institutional borders, we study the configurations of collaborative research networks and consider their international and institutional diversity. We also explore the influence of European policy mechanisms on the international and institutional diversity of collaborative research networks. We conclude that nanotechnology research networks are indeed characterised by a significant degree of collaborative diversity, which in turn exposes a need for participating members to develop strategic capabilities to manage research within diverse networks.

[1]  G. Dosi,et al.  Technological Paradigms and Trajectories , 2007 .

[2]  Wenpin Tsai Knowledge Transfer in Intraorganizational Networks: Effects of Network Position and Absorptive Capacity on Business Unit Innovation and Performance , 2001 .

[3]  Pedro L. Marin,et al.  Public Policies Towards Research Joint Venture: Institutional Design and Participants’ Characteristics , 2008 .

[4]  Philippe Larédo,et al.  The networks promoted by the framework programme and the questions they raise about its formulation and implementation , 1998 .

[5]  Ursula Mense-Petermann Micro-political or inter-cultural conflicts? - An integrating approach , 2006 .

[6]  JoAnne Yates,et al.  Life in the Trading Zone: Structuring Coordination Across Boundaries in Postbureaucratic Organizations , 2006, Organ. Sci..

[7]  Terttu Luukkonen Technology and market orientation in company participation in the EU framework programme , 2002 .

[8]  Steven T. Walsh,et al.  Global distribution of micro–nano technology and fabrication centers: A portfolio analysis approach , 2007 .

[9]  G. Dosi,et al.  The relationships between science, technologies and their industrial exploitation: An illustration through the myths and realities of the so-called ‘European Paradox’ , 2006 .

[10]  Katarina Östergren,et al.  When Norms Collide: Learning Under Organizational Hypocrisy , 2002 .

[11]  Stefan Kuhlmann,et al.  Future governance of innovation policy in Europe — three scenarios , 2001 .

[12]  W. Powell,et al.  Interorganizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology. , 1996 .

[13]  Robert H. Kushler,et al.  Statistical Computing: An Introduction to Data Analysis Using S-PLUS , 2003, Technometrics.

[14]  C. Huxham,et al.  Doing things collaboratively: realizing the advantage or succumbing to inertia? , 2004, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[15]  C. Huxham,et al.  Ambiguity, Complexity and Dynamics in the Membership of Collaboration , 2000 .

[16]  David N. Ku,et al.  Intercluster Innovation Differentials: The Role of Research Universities , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[17]  N. Kastrinos Issues of exploitation: evaluating the impact of the European community framework programme on European industry , 1994 .

[18]  Krsto Pandza,et al.  Absorptive and transformative capacities in nanotechnology innovation systems , 2007 .

[19]  Morten T. Hansen,et al.  The Search-Transfer Problem: The Role of Weak Ties in Sharing Knowledge across Organization Subunits , 1999 .

[20]  Sigvald Harryson,et al.  Flexibility in innovation through external learning: exploring two models for enhanced industry-university collaboration , 2008, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[21]  Terttu Luukkonen,et al.  Additionality of EU framework programmes , 2000 .

[22]  Mariano Ruiz Espejo,et al.  Review of Statistical computing: An introduction to data analysis using S-PLUS by M. J. Crawley, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester 2002 , 2003 .

[23]  Nicholas S. Vonortas,et al.  Managing large research partnerships: Examples from the Advanced Technology Program's Information Infrastructure for Healthcare program , 2006 .

[24]  European Parliament Resolution on Nanosciences and Nanotechnologies: An Action Plan for Europe 2005–2009 , 2010 .

[25]  Alok K. Chakrabarti,et al.  Corporate strategic objectives for establishing relationships with university research centers , 2001, IEEE Trans. Engineering Management.

[26]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[27]  Michael D. Santoro,et al.  Facilitators of Knowledge Transfer in University-Industry Collaborations: A Knowledge-Based Perspective , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[28]  G. Thoma Striving for a Large Market: Evidence from a General Purpose Technology in Action , 2008 .

[29]  Kumiko Miyazaki,et al.  Nanotechnology innovation system: Understanding hidden dynamics of nanoscience fusion trajectories , 2009 .

[30]  Keith Pavitt,et al.  THE INEVITABLE LIMITS OF EU R&D FUNDING , 1998 .

[31]  E. Garnsey,et al.  Commercializing Generic Technology: The Case of Advanced Materials Ventures , 2005 .

[32]  ST NANO,et al.  UNDERSTANDING THE EMERGENCE AND DEPLOYMENT OF " NANO " S , 2009 .

[33]  Petr Hanel,et al.  Industry–University Collaboration by Canadian Manufacturing Firms* , 2006 .

[34]  R. Hogarth,et al.  Why Forecasts Fail. What to Do Instead , 2010 .

[35]  E. H. Simpson,et al.  The Interpretation of Interaction in Contingency Tables , 1951 .

[36]  Roberto Verganti,et al.  Designing foresight studies for Nanoscience and Nanotechnology (NST) future developments , 2008 .

[37]  Jyoti S. A. Bhat,et al.  Concerns of new technology based industries: The case of nanotechnology. , 2005 .

[38]  Daniele Archibugi,et al.  International partnerships for knowledge in business and academia: A comparison between Europe and the USA , 2004 .

[39]  Christopher Palmberg,et al.  Transferring science-based technologies to industry: Does nanotechnology make a difference? , 2010 .

[40]  Fiona E. Murray Innovation as co-evolution of scientific and technological networks: exploring tissue engineering , 2002 .

[41]  Steven T. Walsh,et al.  A theory of innovation for process-based innovations such as nanotechnology , 2008 .

[42]  Terttu Luukkonen,et al.  The difficulties in assessing the impact of EU framework programmes , 1998 .

[43]  G. Ahuja Collaboration Networks, Structural Holes, and Innovation: A Longitudinal Study , 1998 .

[44]  Toke Bjerregaard Industry and academia in convergence: Micro-institutional dimensions of R&D collaboration , 2010 .

[45]  A. Meyer,et al.  Management of an international network of industrial R&D laboratories , 1993 .

[46]  B. Clarysse,et al.  Regional cohesion in Europe? An analysis of how EU public RTD support influences the techno-economic regional landscape , 2001 .

[47]  Arvind Parkhe,et al.  Institutional environments, institutional change and international alliances , 2003 .

[48]  Sally Davenport,et al.  Collaborative research programmes: building trust from difference , 1998 .

[49]  Ronald N. Kostoff,et al.  Global nanotechnology research literature overview , 2007 .

[50]  Jacky F. L. Hong,et al.  Conflicting Identities and Power Between Communities of Practice: The Case of IT Outsourcing , 2009 .

[51]  Vincent Mangematin,et al.  Understanding the emergence and deployment of “nano” S&T , 2007, 0911.3323.

[52]  Steven T. Walsh,et al.  AN INTRODUCTION TO NANOTECHNOLOGY POLICY: OPPORTUNITIES AND CONSTRAINTS FOR EMERGING AND ESTABLISHED ECONOMIES , 2007 .

[53]  L. Welch,et al.  The importance of language in international knowledge transfer , 2008 .

[54]  Kumiko Miyazaki,et al.  An empirical analysis of nanotechnology research domains , 2010 .

[55]  Stefan Kuhlmann,et al.  Across institutional boundaries?: Research collaboration in German public sector nanoscience , 2008 .

[56]  Arvind Parkhe,et al.  Orchestrating Innovation Networks , 2006 .

[57]  N. Arranz,et al.  Joint R&D projects: Experiences in the context of European technology policy , 2006 .

[58]  T. Shinn,et al.  Paths of commercial knowledge: Forms and consequences of university–enterprise synergy in scientist-sponsored firms , 2006 .

[59]  David G. Sirmon,et al.  A model of cultural differences and international alliance performance , 2004 .

[60]  A. Porter,et al.  Nanopatenting patterns in relation to product life cycle , 2007 .

[61]  W. A. Lucas,et al.  Best Practices for Industry-University Collaboration , 2010 .

[62]  Alok K. Chakrabarti,et al.  FIRM SIZE AND TECHNOLOGY CENTRALITY IN INDUSTRY-UNIVERSITY INTERACTIONS , 2002 .

[63]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  A Collective Action Model of Institutional Innovation , 2006 .