Development of the Adolescents’ Communicative Culture in the Context of Digitalization of Additional Education

In the era of digitalization of education and economy and the development of artificial intelligence, adolescents appear highly competitive compared with other generations in understanding digital technologies, acquiring expertise, and mastering modern means of communication, which normally causes intergenerational conflicts and the loss of an adult’s personal and functional authority. The aim of this research was to develop and test a model for developing adolescents’ communicative cultures in an institution of additional education. The research emphasizes the significance of personality-oriented, interactive-communicative, and cultural approaches and conducts a comparative analysis of the sources. Methodologically, the study relies on a quantitative method with primary sources. Besides, the findings of the study contribute to the existing limited stress on the importance of adolescents’ communicative cultures from the perspective of the digitalization of additional education. The study finds that the use of digital options in education has reduced social interaction among students. However, the students prefer to use digital methods of learning as they find them more convenient for communication. Therefore, the digital communication culture has high potential in the educational sector. The findings are novel as this study is one of the few recent studies that examined how communicative culture has transformed due to digital means in education. Doi: 10.28991/ESJ-2022-SIED-019 Full Text: PDF

[1]  B. Bygstad,et al.  From dual digitalization to digital learning space: Exploring the digital transformation of higher education , 2022, Comput. Educ..

[2]  Samuel E. Ehrenreich,et al.  Importance of Digital Communication in Adolescents' Development: Theoretical and Empirical Advancements in the Last Decade. , 2021, Journal of research on adolescence : the official journal of the Society for Research on Adolescence.

[3]  H. Brdesee A Divergent View of the Impact of Digital Transformation on Academic Organizational and Spending Efficiency: A Review and Analytical Study on a University E-Service , 2021, Sustainability.

[4]  Joanna C. Yau,et al.  Motives for Texting During Early Adolescence , 2021, Frontiers in Human Dynamics.

[5]  E. Herghelegiu,et al.  The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Quality of Educational Process: A Student Survey , 2020, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[6]  A. Tsyvunina The Communicative Culture Of Adolescents In The Era Of Informatization And Digitalization , 2020 .

[7]  T. Dienlin,et al.  The impact of digital technology use on adolescent well-being
 , 2020, Dialogues in clinical neuroscience.

[8]  J. Twenge Why increases in adolescent depression may be linked to the technological environment. , 2020, Current opinion in psychology.

[9]  M. Bornstein,et al.  Cross-Cultural Examination of Links between Parent–Adolescent Communication and Adolescent Psychological Problems in 12 Cultural Groups , 2020, Journal of Youth and Adolescence.

[10]  Ruxandra Bejinaru Impact of Digitalization on Education in the Knowledge Economy , 2019 .

[11]  S. Boele,et al.  Parent-Adolescent Communication and Adolescent Delinquency: Unraveling Within-Family Processes from Between-Family Differences , 2019, Journal of Youth and Adolescence.

[12]  Abdelaziz M. Hussien Culture of Traits in Arabic Language Education: Students’ Perception of the Communicative Traits Model , 2018, International Journal of Instruction.

[13]  Abu Bakar Razali,et al.  The Effect of Communicative Activities on Libyan Secondary School Students’ Speaking Performance in Malaysia , 2018, International Journal of Instruction.

[14]  Comprehention Of Written Utterances’ Communicative Structure By Russian Learners Of English , 2018 .

[15]  G. Ryan,et al.  Introduction to positivism, interpretivism and critical theory. , 2018, Nurse researcher.

[16]  Shidur Rahman The Advantages and Disadvantages of Using Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches and Methods in Language “Testing and Assessment” Research: A Literature Review , 2016 .

[17]  Todd R. Davies Mind change: How digital technologies are leaving their mark on our brains , 2016, New Media Soc..

[18]  Bridget C. O’Brien,et al.  Design: Selection of Data Collection Methods. , 2016, Journal of graduate medical education.

[19]  Tom W. Smith,et al.  The SAGE Handbook of Survey Methodology , 2016 .

[20]  M. Deković,et al.  A Between- and Within-Person Analysis of Parenting and Time Spent in Criminogenic Settings During Adolescence: The Role of Self-Control and Delinquent Attitudes , 2016 .

[21]  G. Garza,et al.  Mending fences: Defining the domains and approaches of quantitative and qualitative research. , 2015 .

[22]  R. Rhodes Rethinking Research Ethics , 2010, The American journal of bioethics : AJOB.

[23]  Alan Durndell,et al.  Peer interaction and critical thinking: Face-to-face or online discussion? , 2008 .

[24]  G. Butler,et al.  Overcoming Social Anxiety and Shyness: A Self-Help Guide Using Cognitive Behavioral Techniques , 1999, Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy.

[25]  H. Weisberg Central tendency and variability , 1991 .

[26]  L. O'Brien,et al.  Hospital Length of Stay and Discharge Destination , 2018 .

[27]  Jason Bloomberg Digitization, Digitalization, And Digital Transformation: Confuse Them At Your Peril , 2018 .

[28]  M. Parvaz Second Language Research: Methodology and Design (2nd ed.). Alison Mackey and Susan M. Gass. Routledge, New York and London (2016). xvii + 433 pp., ISBN: 978- 1-138-80856-0 (paperback). , 2017 .

[29]  Philip E. T. Lewis,et al.  Research Methods for Business Students (5th edn) , 2007 .

[30]  N. McCarthy,et al.  Well connected , 2005 .