Troponin and Cardiac Events in Stable Ischemic Heart Disease and Diabetes.

BACKGROUND Cardiac troponin concentrations are used to identify patients who would benefit from urgent revascularization for acute coronary syndromes. We hypothesized that they might be used in patients with stable ischemic heart disease to identify those at high risk for cardiovascular events who might also benefit from prompt coronary revascularization. METHODS We measured the cardiac troponin T concentration at baseline with a high-sensitivity assay in 2285 patients who had both type 2 diabetes and stable ischemic heart disease and were enrolled in the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation in Type 2 Diabetes trial. We tested for an association between the troponin T concentration and a composite end point of death from cardiovascular causes, myocardial infarction, or stroke; we then evaluated whether random assignment to prompt revascularization reduced the rate of the composite end point in patients with an abnormal troponin T concentration (≥14 ng per liter) as compared with those with a normal troponin T concentration (<14 ng per liter). RESULTS Of the 2285 patients, 2277 (99.6%) had detectable (≥3 ng per liter) troponin T concentrations and 897 (39.3%) had abnormal troponin T concentrations at baseline. The 5-year rate of the composite end point was 27.1% among the patients who had had abnormal troponin T concentrations at baseline, as compared with 12.9% among those who had had normal baseline troponin T concentrations. In models that were adjusted for cardiovascular risk factors, severity of diabetes, electrocardiographic abnormalities, and coronary anatomy, the hazard ratio for the composite end point among patients with abnormal troponin T concentrations was 1.85 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.48 to 2.32; P<0.001). Among patients with abnormal troponin T concentrations, random assignment to prompt revascularization, as compared with medical therapy alone, did not result in a significant reduction in the rate of the composite end point (hazard ratio, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.74 to 1.25). CONCLUSIONS The cardiac troponin T concentration was an independent predictor of death from cardiovascular causes, myocardial infarction, or stroke in patients who had both type 2 diabetes and stable ischemic heart disease. An abnormal troponin T value of 14 ng per liter or higher did not identify a subgroup of patients who benefited from random assignment to prompt coronary revascularization. (Funded by the National Institutes of Health and Roche Diagnostics; BARI 2D ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00006305.).

[1]  A. Jaffe,et al.  2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. , 2014, Circulation.

[2]  A. Jaffe,et al.  Men are different than women: it's true for cardiac troponin too. , 2014, Clinical biochemistry.

[3]  Robert H Christenson,et al.  Age- and sex-dependent upper reference limits for the high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T assay. , 2014, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[4]  A. Keech,et al.  Association of contemporary sensitive troponin I levels at baseline and change at 1 year with long-term coronary events following myocardial infarction or unstable angina: results from the LIPID Study (Long-Term Intervention With Pravastatin in Ischaemic Disease). , 2014, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[5]  C. Held,et al.  Biomarkers in Relation to the Effects of Ticagrelor in Comparison With Clopidogrel in Non–ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients Managed With or Without In-Hospital Revascularization: A Substudy From the Prospective Randomized Platelet Inhibition and Patient Outcomes (PLATO) Trial , 2014, Circulation.

[6]  S. Solomon,et al.  Prognostic value of cardiac troponin I measured with a highly sensitive assay in patients with stable coronary artery disease. , 2013, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[7]  Sankey V. Williams,et al.  2012 ACCF/AHA/ACP/AATS/PCNA/SCAI/STS Guideline for the diagnosis and management of patients with stable ischemic heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines, and the American College of Physicians, American Ass , 2012, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[8]  Sankey V. Williams,et al.  2012 ACCF/AHA/ACP/AATS/PCNA/SCAI/STS guideline for the diagnosis and management of patients with stable ischemic heart disease: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines, and the American College of Physi , 2012, Circulation.

[9]  Fred S Apple,et al.  Third universal definition of myocardial infarction , 2012 .

[10]  N. Cook,et al.  Sensitive Cardiac Troponin T Assay and the Risk of Incident Cardiovascular Disease in Women With and Without Diabetes Mellitus: The Women's Health Study , 2011, Circulation.

[11]  H. White Pathobiology of troponin elevations: do elevations occur with myocardial ischemia as well as necrosis? , 2011, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[12]  Eric Boerwinkle,et al.  Cardiac Troponin T Measured by a Highly Sensitive Assay Predicts Coronary Heart Disease, Heart Failure, and Mortality in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study , 2011, Circulation.

[13]  A. Khera,et al.  Association of troponin T detected with a highly sensitive assay and cardiac structure and mortality risk in the general population. , 2010, JAMA.

[14]  M. Zhan,et al.  Association of serial measures of cardiac troponin T using a sensitive assay with incident heart failure and cardiovascular mortality in older adults. , 2010, JAMA.

[15]  M. Pfeffer,et al.  A sensitive cardiac troponin T assay in stable coronary artery disease. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[16]  Regina M. Hardison,et al.  The Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation 2 Diabetes Randomized Trial of Different Treatment Strategies in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus With Stable Ischemic Heart Disease: Impact of Treatment Strategy on Cardiac Mortality and Myocardial Infarction , 2009, Circulation.

[17]  Stefan Blankenberg,et al.  Sensitive troponin I assay in early diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[18]  Tobias Reichlin,et al.  Early diagnosis of myocardial infarction with sensitive cardiac troponin assays. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[19]  Maria Mori Brooks,et al.  A randomized trial of therapies for type 2 diabetes and coronary artery disease. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[20]  Samuel Bernard,et al.  Evidence for Cardiomyocyte Renewal in Humans , 2008, Science.

[21]  Sheng-Chia Chung,et al.  Baseline Characteristics of Patients with Diabetes and Coronary Artery Disease Enrolled in the BARI 2D Trial , 2008 .

[22]  W. Howard,et al.  Optimal Medical Therapy with or without PCI for Stable Coronary Disease , 2008 .

[23]  Sheng-Chia Chung,et al.  Baseline characteristics of patients with diabetes and coronary artery disease enrolled in the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation 2 Diabetes (BARI 2D) trial. , 2008, American heart journal.

[24]  Deepak L. Bhatt,et al.  Utilization of Early Invasive Management Strategies for High-Risk Patients With Non–ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes: Results From the CRUSADE Quality Improvement Initiative , 2004 .

[25]  G. Lamas,et al.  ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction--executive summary. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to revise the 1999 guidelines for the management of patients wi , 2004, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[26]  E. Braunwald,et al.  Ability of minor elevations of troponins I and T to predict benefit from an early invasive strategy in patients with unstable angina and non-ST elevation myocardial infarction: results from a randomized trial. , 2001, JAMA.