Rapid detection of bone metastasis at thoracoabdominal CT: accuracy and efficiency of a new visualization algorithm.

PURPOSE To retrospectively assess the use of a combination of cancellous bone reconstructions (CBR) and multiplanar reconstructions (MPRs) for the detection of bone metastases at thoracoabdominal computed tomography (CT) compared with the use of MPRs alone. MATERIALS AND METHODS The study was approved by the local institutional review board. Included were 156 consecutive patients with confirmed cancer who underwent a whole-body positron emission tomography (PET)/CT examination for clinical purposes (93 male and 63 female patients; mean age ± standard deviation, 59.8 years ± 14.9; range, 11-85 years). Only the CT images were processed with the CBR algorithm, which segments the bones and removes the cortical layer from the images. The PET images served as part of the reference standard. Images from 15 patients were used as a training set. Four radiologists independently evaluated images of half of the remaining 141 patients by using CBRs and MPRs together, and the other half by using MPRs only. Radiologists were blinded to patient names, and patient order was randomized. Results for detection rates and reporting time were recorded and compared with a standard of reference for each patient that was created by one senior radiologist and one nuclear medicine specialist by using all available CT and PET data, CBRs, and follow-up examinations. General estimation equations were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS There were 349 lesions found in 103 patients, with 203 classified as malignant. Each patient was assessed by two readers per method, leading to a total of 698 lesions. The detection rate for all bone lesions was 35% (247 of 698) for MPRs and 74% (520 of 698) when CBRs and MPRs were used together, which was significantly higher (P < .001). The average reading time decreased from 85 to 43 seconds (P < .001) when both reconstructions were used. CONCLUSION Advanced visualization of cancellous bone significantly increased the detection of bone metastases and reduced the time for interpretation.

[1]  R. Uzzo,et al.  The science and practice of bone health in oncology: managing bone loss and metastasis in patients with solid tumors. , 2009, Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN.

[2]  V Argiro,et al.  Perspective volume rendering of CT and MR images: applications for endoscopic imaging. , 1996, Radiology.

[3]  K D Hopper,et al.  Body CT and oncologic imaging. , 2000, Radiology.

[4]  R B Jeffrey,et al.  Spiral CT of renal artery stenosis: comparison of three-dimensional rendering techniques. , 1994, Radiology.

[5]  Jianhua Yao,et al.  Lytic metastases in thoracolumbar spine: computer-aided detection at CT--preliminary study. , 2007, Radiology.

[6]  W. Oyen,et al.  Commonly used imaging techniques for diagnosis and staging. , 2006, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[7]  S. Reske,et al.  FDG-PET for clinical use , 2001, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[8]  M. Dimopoulos,et al.  Advances in imaging and the management of myeloma bone disease. , 2011, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[9]  A. Lipton.  Pathophysiology of bone metastases: how this knowledge may lead to therapeutic intervention. , 2004, The journal of supportive oncology.

[10]  B. Gainor,et al.  A Profile of Metastatic Carcinoma of the Spine , 1985, Spine.

[11]  R. Coleman,et al.  The management of bone metastases. , 2000, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[12]  Michael Kaus,et al.  Semiautomatic vertebrae visualization, detection, and identification for online palliative radiotherapy of bone metastases of the spine. , 2007, Medical physics.

[13]  G. Gavelli,et al.  Lung Perfusion in Patients With Pulmonary Hypertension: Comparison Between MDCT Pulmonary Angiography With minIP Reconstructions and 99mTc-MAA Perfusion Scan , 2008, Investigative radiology.

[14]  M. Reiser,et al.  Whole-Body Imaging of Bone Marrow , 2009, Seminars in musculoskeletal radiology.

[15]  T. Powles,et al.  The role of computed tomography in the detection of bone metastases in breast cancer patients. , 1983, The British journal of radiology.

[16]  S S Gambhir,et al.  A tabulated summary of the FDG PET literature. , 2001, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[17]  Z. Keidar,et al.  FDG-PET and CT patterns of bone metastases and their relationship to previously administered anti-cancer therapy , 2006, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[18]  Naoto T Ueno,et al.  Bone imaging in metastatic breast cancer. , 2004, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[19]  M. Cohen,et al.  Maximum intensity projection images in the detection of simulated pulmonary nodules by spiral CT. , 1998, The British journal of radiology.

[20]  M. Bilsky,et al.  The diagnosis and treatment of metastatic spinal tumor. , 1999, The oncologist.

[21]  G. Roodman.  Mechanisms of bone metastasis. , 2004, Discovery medicine.

[22]  T. Turkington,et al.  Clinical applications of PET in oncology. , 2004, Radiology.

[23]  G. Herman,et al.  Three-dimensional display of human organs from computed tomograms , 1979 .

[24]  Marc Levoy,et al.  Display of surfaces from volume data , 1988, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[25]  R. Coleman.  Skeletal complications of malignancy , 1997, Cancer.

[26]  Zhen Zhao,et al.  Single photon emission computed tomography/spiral computed tomography fusion imaging for the diagnosis of bone metastasis in patients with known cancer , 2010, Skeletal Radiology.

[27]  G. Hortobagyi,et al.  Pamidronate reduces skeletal morbidity in women with advanced breast cancer and lytic bone lesions: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Protocol 18 Aredia Breast Cancer Study Group. , 1999, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[28]  R. Rubens,et al.  The clinical course of bone metastases from breast cancer. , 1987, British Journal of Cancer.

[29]  I. Holen,et al.  Metastasis and bone loss: advancing treatment and prevention. , 2010, Cancer treatment reviews.

[30]  R. Bernstein,et al.  Shading 3D-Images from CT Using Gray-Level Gradients , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[31]  G. Mundy.  Metastasis: Metastasis to bone: causes, consequences and therapeutic opportunities , 2002, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[32]  W. Semmler,et al.  Imaging response to systemic therapy for bone metastases , 2009, European Radiology.

[33]  Stephen Kaptoge,et al.  Can 16-detector multislice CT exclude skeletal lesions during tumour staging? Implications for the cancer patient , 2006, European Radiology.