Broadcasting and Narrowcasting: How Audience Size Affects What People Share

Does the number of people with whom someone communicates influence what he or she discusses and shares? Six studies demonstrate that compared with narrowcasting (i.e., communicating with just one person), broadcasting (i.e., communicating with multiple people) leads consumers to avoid sharing content that makes them look bad. Narrowcasting, however, encourages people to share content that is useful to the message recipient. These effects are driven by communicators’ focus of attention. People naturally tend to focus on the self, but communicating with just one person heightens other-focus, which leads communicators to share less self-presenting content and more useful content. These findings shed light on the drivers of word of mouth and provide insight into when the communication sender (vs. receiver) plays a relatively larger role in what people share.

[1]  M. Schweitzer,et al.  Can Nervous Nelly negotiate? How anxiety causes negotiators to make low first offers, exit early, and earn less profit , 2011 .

[2]  Ann E. Schlosser Posting versus Lurking: Communicating in a Multiple Audience Context , 2005 .

[3]  Constructing Social Reality: Greater Bias for Negative than for Positive Behaviors?. , 1992 .

[4]  Paul A. Bell,et al.  Affective State, Attraction, and Affiliation: Misery Loves Happy Company, Too , 1978 .

[5]  R. Cialdini,et al.  Basking in Reflected Glory: Three (Football) Field Studies , 1976 .

[6]  Sarah G. Moore Some Things Are Better Left Unsaid: How Word of Mouth Influences the Storyteller , 2012 .

[7]  E. Goffman The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life , 1959 .

[8]  Jonathan K. Frenzen,et al.  Structure, Cooperation, and the Flow of Market Information , 1993 .

[9]  Laura E. Buffardi,et al.  Narcissism and Social Networking Web Sites , 2008, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[10]  Olesya Govorun,et al.  Better-than-Average Effect , 2020, Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences.

[11]  M. Zanna,et al.  Attitudes and Attitude Change , 1993 .

[12]  Thomas W. Valente,et al.  Opinion Leadership and Social Contagion in New Product Diffusion , 2011, Mark. Sci..

[13]  Joseph B. Walther,et al.  Selective self-presentation in computer-mediated communication: Hyperpersonal dimensions of technology, language, and cognition , 2007, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[14]  Katherine Burson,et al.  More for the Many: The Influence of Entitativity on Charitable Giving , 2013 .

[15]  Katherine L. Milkman,et al.  What Makes Online Content Viral? , 2012 .

[16]  J. Kruger Lake Wobegon be gone! The "below-average effect" and the egocentric nature of comparative ability judgments. , 1999, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[17]  Desirable Responding Triggered by Affect: Automatic Egotism? , 1987 .

[18]  Jonah A. Berger Arousal Increases Social Transmission of Information , 2011, Psychological science.

[19]  H. E. Burtt,et al.  A Study of Conversations. , 1924 .

[20]  G. Trommsdorff,et al.  Decoding affective communication in intimate relationships , 1992 .

[21]  Jason P. Mitchell,et al.  Disclosing information about the self is intrinsically rewarding , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[22]  Andrew F. Hayes,et al.  Mediation and the Estimation of Indirect Effects in Political Communication Research , 2015 .

[23]  John R. Chambers,et al.  Biases in social comparative judgments: the role of nonmotivated factors in above-average and comparative-optimism effects. , 2004, Psychological bulletin.

[24]  Deborah Davis,et al.  Use of first person pronouns as a function of increased objective self-awareness and performance feedback , 1975 .

[25]  L. Horowitz,et al.  Satisfaction in interpersonal interactions as a function of similarity in level of dysphoria. , 1990, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[26]  Herbert H. Clark,et al.  Contributing to Discourse , 1989, Cogn. Sci..

[27]  Duane T. Wegener,et al.  Attitudes and attitude change. , 1997, Annual review of psychology.

[28]  Amar Cheema,et al.  The Effect of Need for Uniqueness on Word of Mouth , 2010 .

[29]  G. Loewenstein,et al.  Egocentric empathy gaps in social interaction and exchange , 2001 .

[30]  Olivier Toubia,et al.  Intrinsic vs. Image-Related Utility in Social Media: Why Do People Contribute Content to Twitter? , 2013, Mark. Sci..

[31]  Siobhan Chapman Logic and Conversation , 2005 .

[32]  N. Emler A Social Psychology of Reputation , 1990 .

[33]  E. Tory Higgins,et al.  "Saying is believing" effects: When sharing reality about something biases knowledge and evaluations. , 1999 .

[34]  M. L. Klotz,et al.  Personal contact, individuation, and the better-than-average effect. , 1995 .

[35]  D. Tice Esteem protection or enhancement ? self-handicapping motives and attributions differ by trait self-esteem , 1991 .

[36]  K. Pauwels,et al.  Effects of Word-of-Mouth versus Traditional Marketing: Findings from an Internet Social Networking Site , 2009 .

[37]  J. Tedeschi Impression Management Theory and Social Psychological Research , 1981 .

[38]  N. Epley,et al.  Perspective taking as egocentric anchoring and adjustment. , 2004, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[39]  Shelley E. Taylor,et al.  Stalking the elusive "vividness" effect. , 1982 .

[40]  Andrea C. Wojnicki,et al.  Word-of-Mouth as Self-Enhancement , 2008 .

[41]  R. Hastie,et al.  The relationship between memory and judgment depends on whether the judgment task is memory-based or on-line , 1986 .

[42]  G. Loewenstein,et al.  Explaining the Identifiable Victim Effect , 1997 .

[43]  Vera Hoorens,et al.  Self-favoring biases for positive and negative characteristics : Independent phenomena ? , 1996 .

[44]  Zenon W. Pylyshyn,et al.  When is attribution of beliefs justified? [P&W] , 1978, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[45]  Robin I. M. Dunbar,et al.  Human conversational behavior , 1997, Human nature.

[46]  Dwayne D. Gremler,et al.  Electronic word-of-mouth via consumer-opinion platforms: What motivates consumers to articulate themselves on the Internet? , 2004 .

[47]  M. Strube,et al.  The Multiply Motivated Self , 1995 .

[48]  R. Bales Interaction process analysis; a method for the study of small groups. , 2013 .

[49]  Jonah A. Berger,et al.  Communication Channels and Word of Mouth: How the Medium Shapes the Message , 2013 .

[50]  Jacob Goldenberg,et al.  The Different Roles of Product Originality and Usefulness in Generating Word of Mouth , 2011 .

[51]  Robert M. Arkin,et al.  15 – Self-Presentation Styles , 1981 .

[52]  Brian Mullen,et al.  Operationalizing the effect of the group on the individual: A self-attention perspective , 1983 .

[53]  Luk Warlop,et al.  Why it is so Hard to Predict Our Partner's Product Preferences: The Effect of Target Familiarity on Prediction Accuracy , 2006 .

[54]  J. Pennebaker,et al.  The Psychological Meaning of Words: LIWC and Computerized Text Analysis Methods , 2010 .

[55]  Jonah Berger Contagious: Why Things Catch On , 2013 .

[56]  Mor Naaman,et al.  Is it really about me?: message content in social awareness streams , 2010, CSCW '10.

[57]  Neil D. Weinstein,et al.  Reducing unrealistic optimism about illness susceptibility. , 1983 .

[58]  D. Paulhus,et al.  Desirable Responding Triggered by Affect: Automatic Egotism? , 1987 .

[59]  C. Bulte,et al.  Leveraging customer networks , 2009 .

[60]  J. Piaget The Language and Thought of the Child , 1927 .

[61]  Jin-Chern Chiou,et al.  Design, Fabrication, and Control of Components in MEMS-Based Optical Pickups , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.

[62]  Hui-Tzu Grace Chou,et al.  "They Are Happier and Having Better Lives than I Am": The Impact of Using Facebook on Perceptions of Others' Lives , 2012, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[63]  D. Wegner,et al.  Arousal-induced attention to self , 1980 .

[64]  B. Latané The psychology of social impact. , 1981 .

[65]  T. Gilovich,et al.  The spotlight effect in social judgment: an egocentric bias in estimates of the salience of one's own actions and appearance. , 2000, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[66]  Derek D. Rucker,et al.  On Braggarts and Gossips: A Self-Enhancement Account of Word-of-Mouth Generation and Transmission , 2012 .

[67]  Dominic Abrams,et al.  Self-attention and the egocentric assumption of shared perspectives , 1993 .

[68]  Yan Zhang,et al.  Exaggerated, mispredicted, and misplaced: when "it's the thought that counts" in gift exchanges. , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[69]  Nilly Mor,et al.  Self-focused attention and negative affect: a meta-analysis. , 2002, Psychological bulletin.

[70]  Peter H. Reingen,et al.  Social Ties and Word-of-Mouth Referral Behavior , 1987 .

[71]  Eric M. Schwartz,et al.  What Drives Immediate and Ongoing Word of Mouth? , 2011 .

[72]  M. Gilly,et al.  We Are What We Post? Self‐Presentation in Personal Web Space , 2003 .

[73]  Cynthia M. Webster,et al.  Word-Of-Mouth Communications: a Motivational Analysis , 1998 .

[74]  Greg W. Schmidt,et al.  Self-Esteem and Direct Versus Indirect Forms of Self-Enhancement , 1988 .

[75]  Paul Slovic,et al.  “If I look at the mass I will never act”: Psychic numbing and genocide , 2007, Judgment and Decision Making.

[76]  Rebecca K. Ratner,et al.  The Impact of Private versus Public Consumption on Variety-Seeking Behavior , 2002 .

[77]  K. Vohs,et al.  Case Western Reserve University , 1990 .

[78]  Kevin J. Riggs,et al.  Is Belief Reasoning Automatic? , 2006, Psychological science.

[79]  C. Carver,et al.  Self-focusing effects of dispositional self-consciousness, mirror presence, and audience presence. , 1978 .

[80]  M. Selst,et al.  ATTENTIONAL LOAD INCREASES THE POSITIVITY OF SELF-PRESENTATION , 1989 .

[81]  Jeffrey T. Hancock,et al.  Mirror, Mirror on my Facebook Wall: Effects of Exposure to Facebook on Self-Esteem , 2011, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[82]  W. H. Jones,et al.  Assessment of dispositional embarrassability , 1997 .

[83]  W. Chiou,et al.  Enactment of one-to-many communication may induce self-focused attention that leads to diminished perspective taking: The case of Facebook , 2013, Judgment and Decision Making.

[84]  Zoey Chen,et al.  When, Why, and How Controversy Causes Conversation , 2012 .

[85]  Marsha L. Richins Word of Mouth Communication As Negative Information , 1984 .

[86]  Kim P. Corfman,et al.  the Importance of Member Homogeneity to Focus Group Quality , 1995 .

[87]  M. Ross,et al.  Egocentric Biases in Availability and Attribution , 1979 .

[88]  Mark S. Granovetter The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[89]  D. Hamilton,et al.  Perceiving persons and groups. , 1996, Psychological review.

[90]  William Ickes,et al.  Machiavellianism and Self-Monitoring: As Different as “Me” and “You” , 1986 .

[91]  C. Sedikides Assessment, enhancement, and verification determinants of the self-evaluation process. , 1993 .

[92]  Grant Packard,et al.  Compensatory Knowledge Signaling in Consumer Word-of-Mouth , 2013 .