Metacognition as a Basis for Learning Support Software

In order to understand the task of instructional designers who produce learning support software, this paper reviews the influence of learning theory on instructional design, recent developments in computer technology, and the evolving role of the instructor as a facilitator of higher-order thinking. Constructivist principles of learning and an appreciation for the fact that the learner must become more independent and skilled in metacognitive self-assessment and self-management are fundamental to this changing role. Two cognitive tools that provide learner/user support for personal construction of knowledge systems are “MindMap” and “Learning FourMat Processor.” These tools are examined in the light of current learning theory and a recent study comparing the work of novice and expert writers using different forms of performance support. Recommendations are made for the development of a more complete set of cognitive tools that enables users to construct their own multimedia knowledge systems based on higher-order thinking and problem solving.

[1]  Michael E. Martinez,et al.  Components of Interesting Science Experiments. , 1991 .

[2]  P. Alexander,et al.  Coming to Terms: How Researchers in Learning and Literacy Talk About Knowledge , 1991 .

[3]  Lloyd P. Rieber,et al.  Psychological foundations of instructional design for emerging computer-based instructional technologies: Part II , 1989 .

[4]  D. Jonassen.  Evaluating constructivistic learning , 1991 .

[5]  M. Anstey.  Helping children learn how to learn , 1988 .

[6]  David N. Perkins,et al.  What constructivism demands of the learner , 1991 .

[7]  Paul Kahn.  Publishing Webs of Information at Brown University , 1990 .

[8]  Frances P Lawrenz,et al.  Science teaching techniques associated with higher‐order thinking skills , 1990 .

[9]  John Sweller,et al.  Cognitive Load During Problem Solving: Effects on Learning , 1988, Cogn. Sci..

[10]  M. David Merrill,et al.  Constructivism and Instructional Design , 1991 .

[11]  David H. Jonassen,et al.  Hypertext as instructional design , 1991 .

[12]  Rachelle S. Heller,et al.  The Role of Hypermedia in Education: A Look at the Research Issues. , 1990 .

[13]  William Winn,et al.  The assumptions of constructivism and instructional design , 1991 .

[14]  R. Kozma.  The Impact of Computer-Based Tools and Embedded Prompts on Writing Processes and Products of Novice and Advanced College Writers , 1991 .

[15]  M. Hannafin,et al.  Metacognition research and theory: Analysis and implications for instructional design , 1992 .

[16]  D. Perkins,et al.  Rocky Roads to Transfer: Rethinking Mechanism of a Neglected Phenomenon , 1989 .

[17]  Kenneth E. Carlisle,et al.  The Performance Technology of Job Aids. , 1990 .

[18]  David N. Perkins,et al.  Technology Meets Constructivism: Do They Make a Marriage? , 1991 .

[19]  H. Walberg,et al.  What Influences Learning? A Content Analysis of Review Literature , 1990 .

[20]  M. Linn,et al.  Learning and Instruction: An Examination of Four Research Perspectives in Science Education , 1988 .

[21]  John Seely Brown,et al.  Process versus Product: A Perspective on Tools for Communal and Informal Electronic Learning , 1985 .

[22]  Michael Molenda,et al.  A philosophical critique of the claims of “constructivism” , 1991 .