Computer use and satisfaction by Great Plains producers: ordered logit model analysis

Agronomists rely increasingly on computers, and more than half of all producers have access to computers. Increasing farm computer ownership has resulted in intensified efforts to transfer new software technologies to producers; however, little is known about how satisfied producers are with computers and the extent to which computers are actually used. We extended our 1996 survey of Great Plains producers to examine producer computer use and satisfaction and discuss potential implications for agricultural software developers. Building on our earlier computer adoption research, we developed ordered logit models for user satisfaction, frequency of computer use, and number of software applications used. Despite using more robust ordered logit models that fit the data well, surprisingly few explanatory variables were significant. Greater computer skill significantly increased user satisfaction and number of software applications used. Greater education also increased user satisfaction and number of software applications used but reduced frequency of computer use. Farming experience showed similar conflicting results as education, i.e., greater number of years farming resulted in significantly increased computer satisfaction but lower frequency of use and number of software applications used. A few other explanatory variables (e.g., farm owner or operator as the primary computer user had a significant positive influence on frequency of use) were important in one of the three ordered logit models, but no consistent relationship between models was found. Generally, greater frequency of use and computer skill increased perceived usefulness of computers by producers. Implications of these results for agricultural software developers are discussed in the paper.

[1]  Jon Sticklen,et al.  NEPER-Weed: A Picture-Based Expert System for Weed Identification , 1996 .

[2]  Anne Marie Jarvis,et al.  Computer Adoption Decision—Implications for Research and Extension: The Case of Texas Rice Producers , 1990 .

[3]  Tom Addiscott,et al.  SUNDIAL: A PC‐Based System for Simulating Nitrogen Dynamics in Arable Land , 1996 .

[4]  Eugene Jones,et al.  Computer Use by Ohio Commercial Farmers , 1990 .

[5]  David Zilberman,et al.  Computer Use in Agriculture: Evidence from Tulare County, California , 1988 .

[6]  Yakov A. Pachepsky,et al.  Guics: A generic user interface for on-farm crop simulations , 1999 .

[7]  L. A. Lippke,et al.  Adoption and use of farm information systems , 1995 .

[8]  H. D. Coble,et al.  HERB : decision model for postemergence weed control in soybean , 1991 .

[9]  D. Radcliffe,et al.  A Computer Program Relating Solute Potential to Solution Composition for Five Solutes , 1995 .

[10]  Gregory Baker Computer Adoption and Use by New Mexico Nonfarm Agribusinesses , 1992 .

[11]  James C. Ascough,et al.  Farm Computer Adoption in the Great Plains , 1999, Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics.

[12]  Gerald F. Ortmann,et al.  Computer use and factors influencing computer adoption among commercial farmers in Natal Province, South Africa , 1994 .

[13]  James C. Ascough,et al.  Computer use in agriculture: an analysis of Great Plains producers☆ , 1999 .

[14]  William A. Amponsah,et al.  Computer Adoption and Use of Information Services by North Carolina Commercial Farmers , 1995, Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics.