Homologue Pairing in Flies and Mammals: Gene Regulation When Two Are Involved

Chromosome pairing is usually discussed in the context of meiosis. Association of homologues in germ cells enables chromosome segregation and is necessary for fertility. A few organisms, such as flies, also pair their entire genomes in somatic cells. Most others, including mammals, display little homologue pairing outside of the germline. Experimental evidence from both flies and mammals suggests that communication between homologues contributes to normal genome regulation. This paper will contrast the role of pairing in transmitting information between homologues in flies and mammals. In mammals, somatic homologue pairing is tightly regulated, occurring at specific loci and in a developmentally regulated fashion. Inappropriate pairing, or loss of normal pairing, is associated with gene misregulation in some disease states. While homologue pairing in flies is capable of influencing gene expression, the significance of this for normal expression remains unknown. The sex chromosomes pose a particularly interesting situation, as females are able to pair X chromosomes, but males cannot. The contribution of homologue pairing to the biology of the X chromosome will also be discussed.

[1]  D. Nurminsky,et al.  Lack of global meiotic sex chromosome inactivation, and paucity of tissue-specific gene expression on the Drosophila X chromosome , 2011, BMC Biology.

[2]  Emmanuel Barillot,et al.  Live-Cell Chromosome Dynamics and Outcome of X Chromosome Pairing Events during ES Cell Differentiation , 2011, Cell.

[3]  J. Larsson,et al.  Buffering and the evolution of chromosome-wide gene regulation , 2011, Chromosoma.

[4]  G. Felsenfeld,et al.  Specific Sites in the C Terminus of CTCF Interact with the SA2 Subunit of the Cohesin Complex and Are Required for Cohesin-Dependent Insulation Activity , 2011, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[5]  M. Eisen,et al.  Noncanonical Compensation of Zygotic X Transcription in Early Drosophila melanogaster Development Revealed through Single-Embryo RNA-Seq , 2011, PLoS biology.

[6]  P. Georgiev,et al.  Selective interactions of boundaries with upstream region of Abd-B promoter in Drosophila bithorax complex and role of dCTCF in this process , 2010, Nucleic acids research.

[7]  V. Guillemot,et al.  Distance between homologous chromosomes results from chromosome positioning constraints , 2010, Journal of Cell Science.

[8]  G. Sperry,et al.  The Drosophila homolog of the mammalian imprint regulator, CTCF, maintains the maternal genomic imprint in Drosophila melanogaster , 2010, BMC Biology.

[9]  M. Matzke,et al.  High frequency, cell type-specific visualization of fluorescent-tagged genomic sites in interphase and mitotic cells of living Arabidopsis plants , 2010, Plant Methods.

[10]  Kim Nasmyth,et al.  Cohesin: its roles and mechanisms. , 2009, Annual review of genetics.

[11]  K. Sandhu,et al.  Nonallelic transvection of multiple imprinted loci is organized by the H19 imprinting control region during germline development. , 2009, Genes & development.

[12]  Christel Krueger,et al.  Cohesin Is Required for Higher-Order Chromatin Conformation at the Imprinted IGF2-H19 Locus , 2009, PLoS genetics.

[13]  C.-ting Wu,et al.  Effects of Chromosomal Rearrangements on Transvection at the yellow Gene of Drosophila melanogaster , 2009, Genetics.

[14]  Jeannie T. Lee Lessons from X-chromosome inactivation: long ncRNA as guides and tethers to the epigenome. , 2009, Genes & development.

[15]  V. Corces,et al.  CTCF: Master Weaver of the Genome , 2009, Cell.

[16]  Jeannie T. Lee,et al.  The pluripotency factor, Oct4, interacts with Ctcf and also controls X-chromosome pairing and counting , 2009, Nature.

[17]  E. Heard,et al.  X inactivation and the complexities of silencing a sex chromosome. , 2009, Current opinion in cell biology.

[18]  P. Fraser,et al.  Cohesins form chromosomal cis-interactions at the developmentally regulated IFNG locus , 2009, Nature.

[19]  J. Nitiss DNA topoisomerase II and its growing repertoire of biological functions , 2009, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[20]  Malin J. Svensson,et al.  Buffering of Segmental and Chromosomal Aneuploidies in Drosophila melanogaster , 2009, PLoS genetics.

[21]  Chunhui Hou,et al.  CTCF-dependent enhancer-blocking by alternative chromatin loop formation , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[22]  D. Bachtrog,et al.  Gene content evolution on the X chromosome. , 2008, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[23]  G. Bosco,et al.  Chromosome Alignment and Transvection Are Antagonized by Condensin II , 2008, Science.

[24]  M. Bartkuhn,et al.  Long range chromatin interactions involved in gene regulation. , 2008, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[25]  Peter R Cook,et al.  The role of specialized transcription factories in chromosome pairing. , 2008, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[26]  Karl J. Dykema,et al.  Somatic Pairing of Chromosome 19 in Renal Oncocytoma Is Associated with Deregulated ELGN2-Mediated Oxygen-Sensing Response , 2008, PLoS genetics.

[27]  B. Clurman,et al.  Transvection mediated by the translocated cyclin D1 locus in mantle cell lymphoma , 2008, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[28]  A. Hoffman,et al.  CTCF Regulates Allelic Expression of Igf2 by Orchestrating a Promoter-Polycomb Repressive Complex 2 Intrachromosomal Loop , 2008, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[29]  B. Panning,et al.  X-Inactivation: It Takes Two to Count , 2008, Current Biology.

[30]  B. Chadwick,et al.  The insulator factor CTCF controls MHC class II gene expression and is required for the formation of long-distance chromatin interactions , 2008, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[31]  H. Aburatani,et al.  Cohesin mediates transcriptional insulation by CCCTC-binding factor , 2008, Nature.

[32]  Stephan Sauer,et al.  Cohesins Functionally Associate with CTCF on Mammalian Chromosome Arms , 2008, Cell.

[33]  Guillaume J. Filion,et al.  Sensing X Chromosome Pairs Before X Inactivation via a Novel X-Pairing Region of the Xic , 2007, Science.

[34]  B. Oliver,et al.  Demasculinization of X chromosomes in the Drosophila genus , 2007, Nature.

[35]  A. Arneodo,et al.  Chromosome neighborhood composition determines translocation outcomes after exposure to high-dose radiation in primary cells , 2007, Chromosome Research.

[36]  Jeannie T. Lee,et al.  Evidence that homologous X-chromosome pairing requires transcription and Ctcf protein , 2007, Nature Genetics.

[37]  G. Felsenfeld,et al.  We gather together: insulators and genome organization. , 2007, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[38]  C.-ting Wu,et al.  Disruption of Topoisomerase II Perturbs Pairing in Drosophila Cell Culture , 2007, Genetics.

[39]  K. Nasmyth,et al.  A physical assay for sister chromatid cohesion in vitro. , 2007, Molecular cell.

[40]  Boris Adryan,et al.  CTCF Genomic Binding Sites in Drosophila and the Organisation of the Bithorax Complex , 2007, PLoS genetics.

[41]  Xinxian Deng,et al.  roX RNAs Are Required for Increased Expression of X-Linked Genes in Drosophila melanogaster Males , 2006, Genetics.

[42]  Wouter de Laat,et al.  CTCF mediates long-range chromatin looping and local histone modification in the beta-globin locus. , 2006, Genes & development.

[43]  B. Charlesworth,et al.  Evolution on the X chromosome: unusual patterns and processes , 2006, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[44]  Rolf Ohlsson,et al.  CTCF binding at the H19 imprinting control region mediates maternally inherited higher-order chromatin conformation to restrict enhancer access to Igf2. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[45]  Hui Ling Chen,et al.  CTCF Mediates Interchromosomal Colocalization Between Igf2/H19 and Wsb1/Nf1 , 2006, Science.

[46]  Roland Eils,et al.  Transient colocalization of X-inactivation centres accompanies the initiation of X inactivation , 2006, Nature Cell Biology.

[47]  Chia-Lun Tsai,et al.  Transient Homologous Chromosome Pairing Marks the Onset of X Inactivation , 2006, Science.

[48]  J. Malley,et al.  Global analysis of X-chromosome dosage compensation , 2006, Journal of biology.

[49]  Christine M Disteche,et al.  Dosage compensation of the active X chromosome in mammals , 2006, Nature Genetics.

[50]  Peter J Park,et al.  Global regulation of X chromosomal genes by the MSL complex in Drosophila melanogaster. , 2005, Genes & development.

[51]  J. LaSalle,et al.  Homologous pairing of 15q11-13 imprinted domains in brain is developmentally regulated but deficient in Rett and autism samples. , 2005, Human molecular genetics.

[52]  C. W. Metz Chromosome Studies on the Diptera , 1918, Zeitschrift für induktive Abstammungs- und Vererbungslehre.

[53]  Wolf Reik,et al.  Interaction between differentially methylated regions partitions the imprinted genes Igf2 and H19 into parent-specific chromatin loops , 2004, Nature Genetics.

[54]  P. Shaw,et al.  Interphase chromosomes and the Rabl configuration: does genome size matter? , 2004, Journal of microscopy.

[55]  G. Felsenfeld,et al.  CTCF tethers an insulator to subnuclear sites, suggesting shared insulator mechanisms across species. , 2004, Molecular cell.

[56]  M. Bartolomei,et al.  Transgenic RNAi Reveals Essential Function for CTCF in H19 Gene Imprinting , 2004, Science.

[57]  A. Raap,et al.  Somatic pairing of chromosome 1 centromeres in interphase nuclei of human cerebellum , 1989, Human Genetics.

[58]  F. M. Yeong,et al.  Identification of a Subunit of a Novel Kleisin-β/SMC Complex as a Potential Substrate of Protein Phosphatase 2A , 2003, Current Biology.

[59]  C. Sunkel,et al.  Condensin-dependent localisation of topoisomerase II to an axial chromosomal structure is required for sister chromatid resolution during mitosis , 2003, Journal of Cell Science.

[60]  M. Bartolomei,et al.  Genomic imprinting: intricacies of epigenetic regulation in clusters. , 2003, Annual review of cell and developmental biology.

[61]  D. Spector,et al.  The dynamics of chromosome organization and gene regulation. , 2003, Annual review of biochemistry.

[62]  A. F. Neuwald,et al.  Differential Contributions of Condensin I and Condensin II to Mitotic Chromosome Architecture in Vertebrate Cells , 2003, Cell.

[63]  Josef Loidl,et al.  Chromosome Pairing Does Not Contribute to Nuclear Architecture in Vegetative Yeast Cells , 2003, Eukaryotic Cell.

[64]  Araxi O. Urrutia,et al.  Evidence that the human X chromosome is enriched for male-specific but not female-specific genes. , 2003, Molecular biology and evolution.

[65]  U. K. Laemmli,et al.  A two-step scaffolding model for mitotic chromosome assembly. , 2003, Developmental cell.

[66]  S. Tilghman,et al.  CTCF maintains differential methylation at the Igf2/H19 locus , 2003, Nature Genetics.

[67]  Jeannie T. Lee Homozygous Tsix mutant mice reveal a sex-ratio distortion and revert to random X-inactivation , 2002, Nature Genetics.

[68]  C.-ting Wu,et al.  Enhancer action in trans is permitted throughout the Drosophila genome , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[69]  F. Cuzin,et al.  Transvection effects involving DNA methylation during meiosis in the mouse , 2002, The EMBO journal.

[70]  A. Murray,et al.  Mutation of YCS4, a budding yeast condensin subunit, affects mitotic and nonmitotic chromosome behavior. , 2002, Molecular biology of the cell.

[71]  Ian W Duncan,et al.  Transvection effects in Drosophila. , 2002, Annual review of genetics.

[72]  Jeannie T. Lee,et al.  CTCF, a Candidate Trans-Acting Factor for X-Inactivation Choice , 2001, Science.

[73]  R. Kingston,et al.  A Drosophila Polycomb group complex includes Zeste and dTAFII proteins , 2001, Nature.

[74]  T. Cremer,et al.  Chromosome territories, nuclear architecture and gene regulation in mammalian cells , 2001, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[75]  Victor V Lobanenkov,et al.  Functional association of CTCF with the insulator upstream of the H19 gene is parent of origin-specific and methylation-sensitive , 2000, Current Biology.

[76]  J. Fuchs,et al.  Centromere clustering is a major determinant of yeast interphase nuclear organization. , 2000, Journal of cell science.

[77]  Shirley M. Tilghman,et al.  CTCF mediates methylation-sensitive enhancer-blocking activity at the H19/Igf2 locus , 2000, Nature.

[78]  G. Felsenfeld,et al.  Methylation of a CTCF-dependent boundary controls imprinted expression of the Igf2 gene , 2000, Nature.

[79]  G. Pfeifer,et al.  Maternal-specific footprints at putative CTCF sites in the H19 imprinting control region give evidence for insulator function , 2000, Current Biology.

[80]  T. Mahmoudi,et al.  The Drosophila brahma complex is an essential coactivator for the trithorax group protein zeste. , 2000, Genes & development.

[81]  R. Jaenisch,et al.  A shift from reversible to irreversible X inactivation is triggered during ES cell differentiation. , 2000, Molecular cell.

[82]  Peter Teague,et al.  Differences in the Localization and Morphology of Chromosomes in the Human Nucleus , 1999, The Journal of cell biology.

[83]  P. Verveer,et al.  Homologous association of the Bithorax-Complex during embryogenesis: consequences for transvection in Drosophila melanogaster. , 1998, Development.

[84]  S. Henikoff,et al.  Large-scale Chromosomal Movements During Interphase Progression in Drosophila , 1998, The Journal of cell biology.

[85]  J. Bender Cytosine methylation of repeated sequences in eukaryotes: the role of DNA pairing. , 1998, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[86]  J. C. Eissenberg,et al.  Developmental regulation of heterochromatin-mediated gene silencing in Drosophila. , 1998, Development.

[87]  Abby Dernburg,et al.  Homologous Chromosome Pairing in Drosophila melanogaster Proceeds through Multiple Independent Initiations , 1998, The Journal of cell biology.

[88]  M. Kuroda,et al.  An analysis of maleless and histone H4 acetylation in Drosophila melanogaster spermatogenesis , 1998, Mechanisms of Development.

[89]  A. Vostrov,et al.  The zinc finger protein CTCF binds to the APBbeta domain of the amyloid beta-protein precursor promoter. Evidence for a role in transcriptional activation. , 1997, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[90]  V. Chandler,et al.  Paramutation and related allelic interactions. , 1997, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[91]  P. Cook The transcriptional basis of chromosome pairing. , 1997, Journal of cell science.

[92]  H. Bellen,et al.  Chromatid Segregation at Anaphase Requires the barren Product, a Novel Chromosome-Associated Protein That Interacts with Topoisomerase II , 1996, Cell.

[93]  N. B. Atkin,et al.  Evidence for somatic pairing of chromosome 7 and 10 homologs in a follicular lymphoma. , 1996, Cancer genetics and cytogenetics.

[94]  R. Aramayo,et al.  Meiotic Transvection in Fungi , 1996, Cell.

[95]  J. Lucchesi Dosage compensation in Drosophila and the ‘complex’ world of transcriptional regulation , 1996, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[96]  T. Kornberg,et al.  Reduction of transcription by homologue asynapsis in Drosophila imaginal discs , 1996, Nature.

[97]  P. Neiman,et al.  An exceptionally conserved transcriptional repressor, CTCF, employs different combinations of zinc fingers to bind diverged promoter sequences of avian and mammalian c-myc oncogenes , 1996, Molecular and cellular biology.

[98]  J. LaSalle,et al.  Homologous Association of Oppositely Imprinted Chromosomal Domains , 1996, Science.

[99]  K. Golic,et al.  A quantitative measure of the mitotic pairing of alleles in Drosophila melanogaster and the influence of structural heterozygosity. , 1996, Genetics.

[100]  M. Lalande Parental imprinting and human disease. , 1996, Annual review of genetics.

[101]  M. Bartolomei,et al.  A paternal–specific methylation imprint marks the alleles of the mouse H19 gene , 1995, Nature Genetics.

[102]  H. Scherthan,et al.  Dynamics of chromosome organization and pairing during meiotic prophase in fission yeast , 1994, The Journal of cell biology.

[103]  R. Jenkins,et al.  Correlation of Cytogenetic and Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization (FISH) Studies in Normal and Gliotic Brain , 1994, Journal of neuropathology and experimental neurology.

[104]  P. Neiman,et al.  CTCF, a conserved nuclear factor required for optimal transcriptional activity of the chicken c-myc gene, is an 11-Zn-finger protein differentially expressed in multiple forms , 1993, Molecular and cellular biology.

[105]  D. Agard,et al.  The onset of homologous chromosome pairing during Drosophila melanogaster embryogenesis , 1993, The Journal of cell biology.

[106]  V. Pirrotta The genetics and molecular biology of zeste in Drosophila melanogaster. , 1991, Advances in genetics.

[107]  A. Raap,et al.  Interphase cytogenetics reveals somatic pairing of chromosome 17 centromeres in normal human brain tissue, but no trisomy 7 or sex-chromosome loss. , 1991, Cytogenetics and cell genetics.

[108]  Victor V Lobanenkov,et al.  A novel sequence-specific DNA binding protein which interacts with three regularly spaced direct repeats of the CCCTC-motif in the 5'-flanking sequence of the chicken c-myc gene. , 1990, Oncogene.

[109]  V. Corces,et al.  Tissue‐specific transcriptional enhancers may act in trans on the gene located in the homologous chromosome: the molecular basis of transvection in Drosophila. , 1990, The EMBO journal.

[110]  U. K. Laemmli,et al.  Preferential, cooperative binding of DNA topoisomerase II to scaffold‐associated regions. , 1989, The EMBO journal.

[111]  U. K. Laemmli,et al.  Metaphase chromosome structure. Involvement of topoisomerase II. , 1986, Journal of molecular biology.

[112]  B. Alberts,et al.  Studies of nuclear and cytoplasmic behaviour during the five mitotic cycles that precede gastrulation in Drosophila embryogenesis. , 1983, Journal of cell science.

[113]  E. Lewis The Theory and Application of a New Method of Detecting Chromosomal Rearrangements in Drosophila melanogaster , 1954, The American Naturalist.

[114]  C. W. Metz Chromosome studies on the Diptera. II. The paired association of chromosomes in the Diptera, and its significance , 1916 .

[115]  N. M. Stevens A study of the germ cells of certain diptera, with reference to the heterochromosomes and the phenomena of synapsis , 1908 .