Using multiple network alignment for studying connectomes

A growing area in neurosciences is focused on the modelling and analysis of connectome, i.e. the set of connections among the constitutive element of the brain. Among the representations, the use of graph theory is largely used. Such discipline uses neuroimaging techniques to derive the connections among the elements. Images represent the anatomical regions of the brain and images are usually compared to an atlas to identify them, and this process is usually referred to as parcellation. It fails in the presence of disease and for brains of children. Consequently, atlas-free random brain parcellation has been proposed that is based to divide the image into regions and to model each region as a node. Then connections among regions are represented by (un)weighted edges. To improve parcellation, a set of images is taken from the same subject, and then the resulting brain is derived by comparing resulting graphs of each image. Therefore, the question of comparison of the structure of networks arises using network alignment (NA) algorithms. In this paper, we first defined the NA problem formally, then we applied three existing states of the art of multiple alignment algorithms (MNA) on diffusion MRI-derived brain networks, and we compared the performances. Our findings show that MNA algorithms may be applied.

[1]  Jiong Guo,et al.  GEDEVO: An Evolutionary Graph Edit Distance Algorithm for Biological Network Alignment , 2013, GCB.

[2]  Tijana Milenkovic,et al.  MAGNA: Maximizing Accuracy in Global Network Alignment , 2013, Bioinform..

[3]  E. Marder,et al.  From the connectome to brain function , 2013, Nature Methods.

[4]  Behnam Neyshabur,et al.  NETAL: a new graph-based method for global alignment of protein-protein interaction networks , 2013, Bioinform..

[5]  Pietro Hiram Guzzi,et al.  Improving the Robustness of Local Network Alignment: Design and Extensive Assessmentof a Markov Clustering-Based Approach , 2014, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics.

[6]  Pietro Hiram Guzzi,et al.  AlignMCL: Comparative analysis of protein interaction networks through Markov clustering , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine Workshops.

[7]  Jean-Baptiste Poline,et al.  Which fMRI clustering gives good brain parcellations? , 2014, Front. Neurosci..

[8]  Jie Tang,et al.  Simultaneous Optimization of both Node and Edge Conservation in Network Alignment via WAVE , 2014, WABI.

[9]  Michael Breakspear,et al.  Graph analysis of the human connectome: Promise, progress, and pitfalls , 2013, NeuroImage.

[10]  A. Kambadakone,et al.  Diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging of liver: Principles, clinical applications and recent updates , 2017, World journal of hepatology.

[11]  R. Turner,et al.  Microstructural Parcellation of the Human Cerebral Cortex – From Brodmann's Post-Mortem Map to in vivo Mapping with High-Field Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2011, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[12]  Aaron Striegel,et al.  Local versus global biological network alignment , 2015, Bioinform..

[13]  D. Long Networks of the Brain , 2011 .

[14]  Vipin Vijayan,et al.  Multiple Network Alignment via MultiMAGNA++ , 2016, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics.

[15]  Mingrui Xia,et al.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Graph Theoretical Analysis of Complex Brain Networks in Neuropsychiatric Disorders , 2011, Brain Connect..

[16]  Mario Cannataro,et al.  An extensive assessment of network alignment algorithms for comparison of brain connectomes , 2017, BMC Bioinformatics.

[17]  Tanya Y. Berger-Wolf,et al.  Network Structure Inference, A Survey: Motivations, Methods, and Applications , 2016 .

[18]  Jiong Guo,et al.  Multiple graph edit distance: simultaneous topological alignment of multiple protein-protein interaction networks with an evolutionary algorithm , 2014, GECCO.

[19]  Mario Cannataro,et al.  Using Network Alignment for Analysis of Connectomes: Experiences from a Clinical Dataset , 2016, BCB.

[20]  O. Sporns,et al.  Complex brain networks: graph theoretical analysis of structural and functional systems , 2009, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[21]  H. Lehrach,et al.  A Human Protein-Protein Interaction Network: A Resource for Annotating the Proteome , 2005, Cell.

[22]  M. Cannataro,et al.  AlignNemo: A Local Network Alignment Method to Integrate Homology and Topology , 2012, PloS one.

[23]  Olaf Sporns,et al.  The Human Connectome: A Structural Description of the Human Brain , 2005, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[24]  Christopher J. Cueva,et al.  Natural Grouping of Neural Responses Reveals Spatially Segregated Clusters in Prearcuate Cortex , 2015, Neuron.

[25]  Wayne B. Hayes,et al.  SANA: simulated annealing far outperforms many other search algorithms for biological network alignment , 2017, Bioinform..

[26]  E. Ziv,et al.  Brain without Anatomy: Construction and Comparison of Fully Network-Driven Structural MRI Connectomes , 2014, PloS one.

[27]  A. Toga,et al.  Mapping the human connectome. , 2012, Neurosurgery.

[28]  Bonnie Berger,et al.  IsoRankN: spectral methods for global alignment of multiple protein networks , 2009, Bioinform..

[29]  Edward T. Bullmore,et al.  Network Scaling Effects in Graph Analytic Studies of Human Resting-State fMRI Data , 2010, Front. Syst. Neurosci..

[30]  Pietro Hiram Guzzi,et al.  Survey of local and global biological network alignment: the need to reconcile the two sides of the same coin , 2017, Briefings Bioinform..

[31]  Robert Patro,et al.  Global network alignment using multiscale spectral signatures , 2012, Bioinform..