Two stages of word processing during eye fixations in the reading of prose

Two experiments explored word processing during the reading of prose. Word frequency and predictability were manipulated to assess lexical access and context-dependent word interpretation. A mask moved in synchrony with the reader's eyes. The effects of this mask combined additively with word frequency and predictability in the first fixation duration data. However, when the sums of the individual fixations on a word were computed, there was a consistent tendency toward a mask × predictability interaction, while the mask again combined additively with word frequency. It is argued that the on-line processing of individual words becomes increasingly differentiated as postlexical processing becomes implicated.

[1]  D. Swinney,et al.  On the Psychological Reality of the Phoneme: Perception, Identification, and Consciousness. , 1973 .

[2]  K. Rayner,et al.  Contextual effects on word perception and eye movements during reading , 1981 .

[3]  Helen Smith Cairns,et al.  Effects of prior context upon the integration of lexical information during sentence processing , 1981 .

[4]  M A Just,et al.  A theory of reading: from eye fixations to comprehension. , 1980, Psychological review.

[5]  Donald J. Foss,et al.  Identifying the speech codes , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[6]  K. Rayner,et al.  Making and correcting errors during sentence comprehension: Eye movements in the analysis of structurally ambiguous sentences , 1982, Cognitive Psychology.

[7]  C. A. Becker.  Semantic context and word frequency effects in visual word recognition. , 1979, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[8]  K. Rayner.  Visual attention in reading: Eye movements reflect cognitive processes , 1977, Memory & cognition.

[9]  J. H. Bertera,et al.  Masking of foveal and parafoveal vision during eye fixations in reading. , 1981, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[10]  P. Carpenter,et al.  Lexical retrieval and error recovery in reading: A model based on eye fixations , 1981 .

[11]  B. J. Davidson,et al.  Regression analyses as a tool for studying reading processes: Comment on Just and Carpenters eye fixation theory , 1982, Memory & cognition.

[12]  J. H. Bertera,et al.  Latency of sequential eye movements: implications for reading. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[13]  John J. L. Morton,et al.  Interaction of information in word recognition. , 1969 .

[14]  Saul Sternberg,et al.  The discovery of processing stages: Extensions of Donders' method , 1969 .

[15]  C A Becker,et al.  Semantic context effects in visual word recognition, sentence processing, and reading: evidence for semantic strategies. , 1982, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[16]  Keith E. Stanovich,et al.  Source of Inhibition in Experiments on the Effect of Sentence Context on Word Recognition. , 1982 .

[17]  K. Stanovich,et al.  Mechanisms of sentence context effects in reading: Automatic activation and conscious attention , 1979 .

[18]  C. A. Becker.  Allocation of attention during visual word recognition. , 1976, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[19]  Thomas H. Killion,et al.  Interaction of visual and cognitive effects in word recognition. , 1977 .

[20]  K. Stanovich,et al.  On priming by a sentence context. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[21]  H. Kucera,et al.  Computational analysis of present-day American English , 1967 .

[22]  K. Stanovich,et al.  The effect of sentence context on ongoing word recognition: Tests of a two-process theory. , 1981 .

[23]  S. Sternberg.  Memory-scanning: mental processes revealed by reaction-time experiments. , 1969, American scientist.

[24]  C. A. Becker.  Semantic context effects in visual word recognition: An analysis of semantic strategies , 1980, Memory & cognition.