A Systematic Investigation of Gesture Kinematics in Evolving Manual Languages in the Lab

Abstract Silent gestures consist of complex multi‐articulatory movements but are now primarily studied through categorical coding of the referential gesture content. The relation of categorical linguistic content with continuous kinematics is therefore poorly understood. Here, we reanalyzed the video data from a gestural evolution experiment (Motamedi, Schouwstra, Smith, Culbertson, & Kirby, 2019), which showed increases in the systematicity of gesture content over time. We applied computer vision techniques to quantify the kinematics of the original data. Our kinematic analyses demonstrated that gestures become more efficient and less complex in their kinematics over generations of learners. We further detect the systematicity of gesture form on the level of thegesture kinematic interrelations, which directly scales with the systematicity obtained on semantic coding of the gestures. Thus, from continuous kinematics alone, we can tap into linguistic aspects that were previously only approachable through categorical coding of meaning. Finally, going beyond issues of systematicity, we show how unique gesture kinematic dialects emerged over generations as isolated chains of participants gradually diverged over iterations from other chains. We, thereby, conclude that gestures can come to embody the linguistic system at the level of interrelationships between communicative tokens, which should calibrate our theories about form and linguistic content.

[1]  Thomas Seidl,et al.  Spatiotemporal Similarity Search in 3D Motion Capture Gesture Streams , 2015, SSTD.

[2]  James A. Dixon,et al.  Gesture Networks: Introducing Dynamic Time Warping and Network Analysis for the Kinematic Study of Gesture Ensembles , 2020 .

[3]  Simon Kirby,et al.  Iconicity and the Emergence of Combinatorial Structure in Language , 2016, Cogn. Sci..

[4]  Simon Kirby,et al.  Do all aspects of learning benefit from iconicity? Evidence from motion capture , 2020 .

[5]  H. Pattee,et al.  Laws, langugae and life : Howard Pattee's classic papers on the physics of symbols with contemporary commentary , 2012 .

[6]  Joanna Rączaszek-Leonardi,et al.  LAWS, LANGUAGE and LIFE , 2012, Biosemiotics.

[7]  H. Zelaznik,et al.  Motor Learning in Sign Language Students , 2013 .

[8]  Christopher T. Kello,et al.  “How do humans make sense?” multiscale dynamics and emergent meaning , 2017, New Ideas in Psychology.

[9]  A. Senghas,et al.  Children Creating Core Properties of Language: Evidence from an Emerging Sign Language in Nicaragua , 2004, Science.

[10]  Meinard Müller,et al.  Information retrieval for music and motion , 2007 .

[11]  N. J. Enfield,et al.  The Anatomy of Meaning: Speech, Gesture, and Composite Utterances , 2009 .

[12]  Tessa Verhoef,et al.  Measuring conventionalization in the manual modality , 2016 .

[13]  S. Kirby,et al.  Iterated learning and the evolution of language , 2014, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[14]  David Peeters,et al.  Beat gestures influence which speech sounds you hear , 2020, bioRxiv.

[15]  D. McNeill Gesture and Thought , 2005 .

[16]  Nick Chater,et al.  The Now-or-Never bottleneck: A fundamental constraint on language , 2015, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[17]  Carl Börstell,et al.  Spatial metaphors in antonym pairs across sign languages , 2020 .

[18]  Linda Drijvers,et al.  Speeding up the detection of non-iconic and iconic gestures (SPUDNIG): A toolkit for the automatic detection of hand movements and gestures in video data , 2019, Behavior Research Methods.

[19]  G. J. Thomas The Co-ordination and Regulation of Movements , 1967 .

[20]  W. Sandler The Body as Evidence for the Nature of Language , 2018, Front. Psychol..

[21]  Ray Jackendoff,et al.  Central Taurus Sign Language: On the Edge of Conventionalization , 2021 .

[22]  Carl Börstell,et al.  Visual Iconicity Across Sign Languages: Large-Scale Automated Video Analysis of Iconic Articulators and Locations , 2018, Front. Psychol..

[23]  Simon Kirby,et al.  Emergence of combinatorial structure and economy through iterated learning with continuous acoustic signals , 2014, J. Phonetics.

[24]  Janet Beavin Bavelas,et al.  Linguistic influences on gesture’s form , 2005 .

[25]  Tim Sainburg,et al.  Latent space visualization, characterization, and generation of diverse vocal communication signals , 2019, bioRxiv.

[26]  Gesture–speech physics in fluent speech and rhythmic upper limb movements , 2020, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[27]  S. Kirby,et al.  Evolving artificial sign languages in the lab: From improvised gesture to systematic sign , 2019, Cognition.

[28]  Betty Tuller,et al.  A “Dynamic Pattern” Perspective on the Control and Coordination of Movement , 1983 .

[29]  D. Bolinger,et al.  语言要略 = Aspects of Language , 1968 .

[30]  Eamonn J. Keogh,et al.  Extracting Optimal Performance from Dynamic Time Warping , 2016, KDD.

[31]  Mark Dingemanse,et al.  Alignment in Multimodal Interaction: An Integrative Framework , 2020, Cogn. Sci..

[32]  Morten H. Christiansen,et al.  Arbitrariness, Iconicity, and Systematicity in Language , 2015, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[33]  R. Paget The Origin of Speech , 1927, Nature.

[34]  Irit Meir,et al.  Patterned iconicity in sign language lexicons , 2013 .

[35]  Yaser Sheikh,et al.  OpenPose: Realtime Multi-Person 2D Pose Estimation Using Part Affinity Fields , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[36]  Simon Kirby,et al.  Sequence Memory Constraints Give Rise to Language-Like Structure through Iterated Learning , 2017, PloS one.

[37]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Visualizing Data using t-SNE , 2008 .

[38]  Simon Kirby,et al.  Musical evolution in the lab exhibits rhythmic universals , 2016, Nature Human Behaviour.

[39]  A. Özyürek,et al.  Types of iconicity and combinatorial strategies distinguish semantic categories in silent gesture across cultures , 2019, Language and Cognition.

[40]  Irina Simanova,et al.  Toward the markerless and automatic analysis of kinematic features: A toolkit for gesture and movement research , 2018, Behavior Research Methods.

[41]  J A Scott Kelso,et al.  Reconciling symbolic and dynamic aspects of language: Toward a dynamic psycholinguistics. , 2008, New ideas in psychology.

[42]  Dagmar Sternad,et al.  Sensitivity of Smoothness Measures to Movement Duration, Amplitude, and Arrests , 2009, Journal of motor behavior.

[43]  G. Āllport The Psycho-Biology of Language. , 1936 .

[44]  Patrick C. Trettenbrein,et al.  Controlling Video Stimuli in Sign Language and Gesture Research: The OpenPoseR Package for Analyzing OpenPose Motion-Tracking Data in R , 2021, Frontiers in Psychology.

[45]  John B. Haviland,et al.  The emerging grammar of nouns in a first generation sign language: Specification, iconicity, and syntax , 2015 .

[46]  A. Kendon Gesture: Visible Action as Utterance , 2004 .

[47]  Wendy Sandler,et al.  Taking meaning in hand : Iconic motivations in two-handed signs , 2016 .

[48]  Martha E. Tyrone,et al.  The Phonetics of Head and Body Movement in the Realization of American Sign Language Signs , 2016, Phonetica.

[49]  Divya Tomar,et al.  Clustering of lung cancer data using Foggy K-means , 2013, 2013 International Conference on Recent Trends in Information Technology (ICRTIT).

[50]  Thomas Seidl,et al.  Efficient Query Processing in 3D Motion Capture Gesture Databases , 2016, Int. J. Semantic Comput..

[51]  J. Kelso,et al.  Functionally specific articulatory cooperation following jaw perturbations during speech: evidence for coordinative structures. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[52]  N. Eagle,et al.  Network Diversity and Economic Development , 2010, Science.

[53]  Eva Liina Asu,et al.  Novel vocalizations are understood across cultures , 2021, Scientific Reports.

[54]  Toni Giorgino,et al.  Computing and Visualizing Dynamic Time Warping Alignments in R: The dtw Package , 2009 .

[55]  Xihong Wu,et al.  Speaking rhythmically improves speech recognition under "cocktail-party" conditions. , 2018, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[56]  S. Kirby,et al.  Language evolution in the laboratory , 2010, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[57]  Harold Bekkering,et al.  The communicative advantage: how kinematic signaling supports semantic comprehension , 2019, Psychological research.

[58]  Gary Lupyan,et al.  Iconicity can ground the creation of vocal symbols , 2015, Royal Society Open Science.

[59]  N. J. Enfield,et al.  Natural Causes of Language: Frames, Biases, and Cultural Transmission , 2014 .

[60]  Asli Özyürek,et al.  Semantically Related Gestures Move Alike: Towards a Distributional Semantics of Gesture Kinematics , 2021, HCI.

[61]  Judith Holler,et al.  An experimental investigation of how addressee feedback affects co-speech gestures accompanying spea , 2011 .

[62]  E. Gibson,et al.  How Efficiency Shapes Human Language , 2019, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.