The self-control of emotional reactions to a stressful film.

The control of emotion—its reduction and enhancement—is a central theme m personahty and m psychopathology, but there has been relatively little empirical research on the problem One senes of experiments emanatmg from tins laboratory (e.g, Speisman, Lazarus, Mordkoff, & Davison, 1964, Lazarus & Alfert, 1964; Lazarus, Opton, Nomikos, & Rankm, 1965, Folkms, Lawson, Opton, & Lazarus, 1968) has focussed on the way emotional reactions can be mampulated by altermg the person's appraisal of a potentially stressful film event. Two features of this and related research limit somewhat the extent to which it can serve as a laboratory analogue of the control of emotion m real life. First, most existmg theory and research have been directed at the way people reduce or inhibit painful emotions or psychological stress reactions. However, there are times when the reduction of emotion may have undersirable consequences, either for the mdividual (see Janis, 1958) or for the society As to societal harms, the human capacity to achieve detachment from a disturbmg event made it easier for Germans to ignore, or to tolerate without protest, knowledge of the Nazi treatment of European Jewry durmg World War II. Opton (1971) has recently presented mterview data indicatmg that large numbers of Americans have done the same wi& respect to the My Lai massacre in Vietnam Thus, while being one of the chief means by which mdividuals cope with potentially stressful inputs, emotional detachment may sometimes lead to negative personal and social consequences

[1]  Kelly G. Shaver,et al.  Defensive attribution-Effects of severity and relevance on the responsibility assigned for an accident , 1970 .

[2]  R. Lazarus,et al.  Desensitization and the experimental reduction of threat. , 1968, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[3]  R. Lazarus,et al.  Surprise versus suspense in the production of stress reaction. , 1968, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[4]  M. Lerner,et al.  Observer's reaction to the "innocent victim": compassion or rejection? , 1966, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[5]  R. Lazarus,et al.  The principle of short-circuiting of threat: further evidence. , 1965, Journal of personality.

[6]  S. B. Friedman,et al.  RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PSYCHOLOGICAL DEFENSES AND MEAN URINARY 17-HYDROXYCORTICOSTEROID EXCRETION RATES. I. A PREDICTIVE STUDY OF PARENTS OF FATALLY ILL CHILDREN. , 1964, Psychosomatic medicine.

[7]  R. Lazarus,et al.  EXPERIMENTAL REDUCTION OF STRESS BASED ON EGO-DEFENSE THEORY. , 1964, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[8]  D. Jackson,et al.  Personality Scale for Shallow Affect , 1963 .

[9]  B. Lebovits,et al.  Coping behavior under extreme stress; observations of patients with severe poliomyelitis. , 1961, Archives of general psychiatry.

[10]  F. Barron,et al.  An ego-strength scale which predicts response to psychotherapy. , 1953, Journal of consulting psychology.

[11]  J. Taylor,et al.  A personality scale of manifest anxiety. , 1953, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[12]  D. Hamburg,et al.  Adaptive problems and mechanisms in severely burned patients. , 1953, Psychiatry.

[13]  E. Walster,et al.  Assignment of responsibility for an accident. , 1966, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[14]  I. B. Myers The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator: Manual (1962). , 1962 .