A Model to Increase the Efficiency of a Competence-Based Collaborative Network

This article provides a model based on the Multi Agent System MAS paradigm that acts as a methodological basis for evaluating the dynamics in a collaborative environment. The model dynamics is strictly driven by the competence concept. In the provided MAS, the agents represent the actors operating on a given area. In particular, the proposed agents are composed of three distinct typologies: i the territorial agent, ii the enterprise agent, and iii the public agent. Each agent has its local information and goals, and interacts with others by using an interaction protocol. The decision-making processes and the competencies characterize in a specific way each one of the different agent typologies working in the system.

[1]  David E. Goldberg,et al.  Genetic Algorithms in Search Optimization and Machine Learning , 1988 .

[2]  Giuseppe Confessore,et al.  A New Model For Achieving Value Added Goals In A Collaborative Industrial Scenario , 2006, PRO-VE.

[3]  Vijayan Sugumaran Intelligent Information Technologies: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools and Applications , 2007 .

[4]  Nando de Freitas,et al.  Inference Strategies for Solving Semi−Markov Decision Processes , 2012 .

[5]  Juan Humberto Sossa Azuela,et al.  Bioinspired Associative Memories , 2009, Encyclopedia of Artificial Intelligence.

[6]  Hamideh Afsarmanesh,et al.  Towards next Business Models , 2004 .

[7]  Patrick Burlat,et al.  Evaluating orders allocation within networks of firms , 2003 .

[8]  Vijayan Sugumaran Intelligent support systems : knowledge management , 2002 .

[9]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  Multicriteria Decision Making: The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation , 1990 .

[10]  Peter Loos,et al.  Distributed model management platform for cross-enterprise business process management in virtual enterprise networks , 2007, J. Intell. Manuf..

[11]  V. Sugumaran The Inaugural Issue of the International Journal of Intelligent Information Technologies , 2005 .

[12]  Alejandro Pazos Sierra,et al.  Encyclopedia of Artificial Intelligence , 2008 .

[13]  T. Saaty Relative measurement and its generalization in decision making why pairwise comparisons are central in mathematics for the measurement of intangible factors the analytic hierarchy/network process , 2008 .

[14]  Panos M. Pardalos,et al.  Random assignment problems , 2009, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[15]  Jesse Hoey,et al.  Decision Theory Models for Applications in Artificial Intelligence: Concepts and Solutions , 2011 .

[16]  Raj Aggarwal,et al.  Capital budgeting under uncertainty , 1994 .

[17]  Nicholas R. Jennings,et al.  Applying agent technology , 1995, Appl. Artif. Intell..

[18]  Hamideh Afsarmanesh,et al.  A Modeling Framework for Collaborative Networked Organizations , 2006, PRO-VE.

[19]  T. Kalu Capital budgeting under uncertainty: An extended goal programming approach , 1999 .

[20]  Xiannong Meng,et al.  An Empirical Performance Measurement of Microsoft's Search Engine and its Comparison with Other Major Search Engines , 2005, Int. J. Intell. Inf. Technol..

[21]  Joseph H. M. Tah,et al.  Towards an agent-based construction supply network modelling and simulation platform , 2005 .

[22]  Hamideh Afsarmanesh,et al.  Collaborative Networked Organizations , 2004, Springer US.

[23]  Claus Rautenstrauch,et al.  A Case Study on Forecasting of the Return of Scrapped Products through Simulation and Fuzzy Reasoning , 2002 .

[24]  Yan Wang Document-Driven Design for Distributed CAD Services , 2007 .

[25]  F. Molina-Morales European industrial districts: Influence of geographic concentration on performance of the firm , 2001 .

[26]  Thorsten Kuhlmann,et al.  Intelligent decision support , 1998 .