Chapter 3 Law, Psychology, and Morality

Abstract In a democratic society, law is an important means to express, manipulate, and enforce moral codes. Demonstrating empirically that law can achieve moral goals is difficult. Nevertheless, public interest groups spend considerable energy and resources to change the law with the goal of changing not only morally laden behaviors, but also morally laden cognitions and emotions. Additionally, even when there is little reason to believe that a change in law will lead to changes in behavior or attitudes, groups see the law as a form of moral capital that they wish to own, to make a statement about society. Examples include gay sodomy laws, abortion laws, and prohibition. In this chapter, we explore the possible mechanisms by which law can influence attitudes and behavior. To this end, we consider informational and group influence of law on attitudes, as well as the effects of salience, coordination, and social meaning on behavior, and the behavioral backlash that can result from a mismatch between law and community attitudes. Finally, we describe two lines of psychological research — symbolic politics and group identity—that can help explain how people use the law, or the legal system, to effect expressive goals.

[1]  Dale T. Miller,et al.  The Power of the Myth of Self-Interest , 1996 .

[2]  Tom R. Tyler,et al.  Political System Support and Public Response to the Energy Crisis , 1978 .

[3]  S. Verba,et al.  Injury to Insult: Unemployment, Class and Political Response , 1982 .

[4]  L. Skitka.  Do the Means Always Justify the Ends, or Do the Ends Sometimes Justify the Means? A Value Protection Model of Justice Reasoning , 2002 .

[5]  D. Kahan.  Social Influence, Social Meaning, and Deterrence , 1997 .

[6]  L. Skitka,et al.  Exploring the psychological underpinnings of the moral mandate effect: motivated reasoning, group differentiation, or anger? , 2006, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[7]  Roderick M. Kramer,et al.  Choice behavior in social dilemmas: Effects of social identity, group size, and decision framing. , 1986 .

[8]  D. Kinder,et al.  Opinion and action in the realm of politics. , 1998 .

[9]  G. Herek,et al.  Symbolic Prejudice or Fear of Infection? A Functional Analysis of AIDS-Related Stigma Among Heterosexual Adults , 1998 .

[10]  Elizabeth Mullen,et al.  Moral Spillovers: The Effect of Moral Violations on Deviant Behavior , 2008 .

[11]  E. Turiel,et al.  The Development of Social Knowledge: Morality and Convention , 1983 .

[12]  J. Darley,et al.  Justice, Liability, And Blame: Community Views And The Criminal Law , 1995 .

[13]  E P HOLLANDER,et al.  Conformity, status, and idiosyncrasy credit. , 1958, Psychological review.

[14]  V. Smith,et al.  The Law and Economics of Irrational Behavior , 2005 .

[15]  Keith Dowding,et al.  Is it Rational to Vote? Five Types of Answer and a Suggestion , 2005 .

[16]  Lawrence Lessig,et al.  The Regulation of Social Meaning , 1995 .

[17]  Morris P. Fiorina,et al.  The Voting Decision: Instrumental and Expressive Aspects , 1976, The Journal of Politics.

[18]  M. Brewer,et al.  Effects of group identity on resource use in a simulated commons dilemma. , 1984, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[19]  Janice Nadler.  Flouting the Law , 2005 .

[20]  S. Chaiken.  The heuristic model of persuasion. , 1987 .

[21]  J. Gusfield,et al.  Symbolic Crusade: Status Politics and the American Temperance Movement , 1964 .

[22]  V. Hamilton,et al.  Handbook of justice research in law , 2002 .

[23]  T. Tyler,et al.  The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice , 1988 .

[24]  D. Kahan,et al.  More Statistics, Less Persuasion: A Cultural Theory of Gun-Risk Perceptions , 2003 .

[25]  Kenworthey Bilz.  The Puzzle of Delegated Revenge , 2008 .

[26]  Kenneth Adams,et al.  Guns and Gun Control , 1996 .

[27]  J. Kozol.  Savage Inequalities: Children in America's Schools , 1992 .

[28]  L. Finer,et al.  Abortion incidence and services in the United States in 2000. , 2003, Perspectives on sexual and reproductive health.

[29]  The severity of intermediate penal sanctions: A psychophysical scaling approach for obtaining community perceptions , 1995 .

[30]  Kevin M. Carlsmith,et al.  Incapacitation and Just Deserts as Motives for Punishment , 2000, Law and human behavior.

[31]  A. Downs.  An Economic Theory of Democracy , 1957 .

[32]  Dale T. Miller,et al.  The disparity between the actual and assumed power of self-interest. , 1998, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[33]  Dan M. Kahan,et al.  Gentle Nudges vs. Hard Shoves: Solving the Sticky Norms Problem , 2000 .

[34]  Solomon E. Asch,et al.  Opinions and Social Pressure , 1955 .

[35]  D. Kahneman.  A perspective on judgment and choice: mapping bounded rationality. , 2003, The American psychologist.

[36]  J. Darley.  Citizens' Sense of Justice and the Legal System , 2001 .

[37]  M. Hogg,et al.  Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. , 1989 .

[38]  S. Fiske,et al.  The Handbook of Social Psychology , 1935 .

[39]  C. C. Helwig,et al.  The relation between law and morality: children's reasoning about socially beneficial and unjust laws. , 2001, Child development.

[40]  M. Horwitz,et al.  Arousal of ingroup-outgroup bias by a chance win or loss. , 1969, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[41]  Mark Warr,et al.  Norms, theories of punishment, and publicly preferred penalties for crimes. , 1983 .

[42]  Dan M. Kahan,et al.  The Logic of Reciprocity: Trust, Collective Action, and Law , 2003 .

[43]  Gerald N. Rosenberg.  The hollow hope : can courts bring about social change? , 1992 .

[44]  Coffee,et al.  Does "Unlawful" Mean "Criminal"?: Reflections on the Disappearing Tort/Crime Distinction in American Law , 1991 .

[45]  Robert J. Bursik,et al.  REDUCTION IN DRUNK DRIVING AS A RESPONSE TO INCREASED THREATS OF SHAME, EMBARRASSMENT, AND LEGAL SANCTIONS , 1993 .

[46]  Acts of Compassion , 1991 .

[47]  Norman J. Finkel,et al.  Commonsense Justice: Jurors' Notions of the Law , 1998 .

[48]  Edward G. Sargis,et al.  Moral conviction: another contributor to attitude strength or something more? , 2005, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[49]  J. Darley,et al.  Making the Punishment Fit the Crime and the Criminal: Attributions of Dangerousness as a Mediator of Liability1 , 2000 .

[50]  W. Crano.  Vested interest, symbolic politics, and attitude-behavior consistency. , 1997, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[51]  Linda R. Tropp,et al.  A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. , 2006, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[52]  Jeffrey T. Grogger,et al.  Certainty vs. Severity of Punishment , 1991 .

[53]  J. Kelley.  The Politics of School Busing , 1974 .

[54]  Dale T. Miller,et al.  The norm of self-interest. , 1999, The American psychologist.

[55]  Joel Cooper,et al.  Complex scientific testimony: How do jurors make decisions? , 1996 .

[56]  Janice Nadler,et al.  Coordinating in the Shadow of the Law: Two Contextualized Tests of the Focal Point Theory of Legal Compliance , 2008 .

[57]  G. Āllport.  The Nature of Prejudice , 1954 .

[58]  D. Kahan.  What Do Alternative Sanctions Mean? , 2019, Shame Punishment.

[59]  Juan Williams.  Thurgood Marshall: American Revolutionary , 1998 .

[60]  S. Steele.  The Content of Our Character: A New Vision of Race In America , 1990 .

[61]  T. Tyler,et al.  Moral Solidarity, Identification with the Community, and the Importance of Procedural Justice: The Police as Prototypical Representatives of a Group's Moral Values* , 2003 .

[62]  Richard H. McAdams,et al.  The Origin, Development, and Regulation of Norms , 1997 .

[63]  J. Cooper,et al.  The “Hired Gun” Effect: Assessing the Effect of Pay, Frequency of Testifying, and Credentials on the Perception of Expert Testimony , 2000, Law and human behavior.

[64]  E. Jennings.  Competition, Constituencies, and Welfare Policies in American States , 1979, American Political Science Review.

[65]  Steven D. Levitt,et al.  Understanding Why Crime Fell in the 1990s: Four Factors That Explain the Decline and Six That Do Not , 2022 .

[66]  J. Haidt.  The emotional dog and its rational tail: a social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. , 2001, Psychological review.

[67]  T. Tyler,et al.  Enacting Justice: The Interplay of Individual and Institutional Perspectives , 2003 .

[68]  Philip P. Frickey,et al.  Law and public choice : a critical introduction , 1991 .

[69]  J. Darley,et al.  “I Am Moral, But You Are Deterred”: Differential Attributions About Why People Obey the Law1 , 2002 .

[70]  T. Tyler,et al.  Self-Interest vs. Symbolic Politics in Policy Attitudes and Presidential Voting , 1980, American Political Science Review.

[71]  W. Crano,et al.  The Pervasive Effects of Vested Interest on Attitude–Criterion Consistency in Political Judgment , 2002 .

[72]  Johs Andenses,et al.  General Prevention--Illusion of Reality , 1952 .

[73]  D. O. Sears,et al.  Qualified Public Support for Bilingual Education: Some Policy Implications , 1990 .

[74]  S. Sugarman,et al.  Smoking policy : law, politics, and culture , 1994 .

[75]  C. Batson,et al.  Why Act for the Public Good? Four Answers , 1994 .

[76]  S. Worchel,et al.  Psychology of intergroup relations , 1986 .

[77]  M. Hogg,et al.  The Sage Handbook of Social Psychology , 2003 .

[78]  D. Wittman.  Economic Analysis of the Law , 2004 .

[79]  Richard H. McAdams.  Cooperation and Conflict: The Economics of Group Status Production and Race Discrimination , 1995 .

[80]  P. Rozin.  The Process of Moralization , 1999 .

[81]  M. Argyle,et al.  DOES THE LAW AFFECT MORAL JUDGEMENTS , 1964 .

[82]  E. Miguel,et al.  Corruption, Norms, and Legal Enforcement: Evidence from Diplomatic Parking Tickets , 2007, Journal of Political Economy.

[83]  Cass R. Sunstein,et al.  Assessing Punitive Damages (with Notes on Cognition and Valuation in Law) , 1998 .

[84]  M. Lerner,et al.  The Justice Motive: Where Social Psychologists Found It, How they Lost It, and Why They May Not Find It Again , 2003, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[85]  T. T. Postmes,et al.  A SIDE View of Social Influence , 2001 .

[86]  Carl P. Hensler,et al.  Whites' Opposition to “Busing”: Self-interest or Symbolic Politics? , 1979, American Political Science Review.

[87]  M. Hewstone,et al.  Intergroup Contact, Forgiveness, and Experience of “The Troubles” in Northern Ireland , 2006 .

[88]  David J. Schneider,et al.  The Psychology of Stereotyping , 2003 .

[89]  A. Rustichini,et al.  A Fine is a Price , 2000, The Journal of Legal Studies.

[90]  Ray C. Rist,et al.  Groups in Contact: The Psychology of Desegregation , 1984 .

[91]  P. Reuter,et al.  Do Citizens Know Whether Their State Has Decriminalized Marijuana? Assessing the Perceptual Component of Deterrence Theory , 2009 .

[92]  Gary D. Kleck,et al.  Crime, Culture Conflict and the Sources of Support for Gun Control , 1996 .

[93]  Joseph P. Forgas,et al.  Social Influence: Direct and Indirect Processes , 2001 .

[94]  P. Converse,et al.  The American voter , 1960 .

[95]  Tom R. Tyler,et al.  Psychological models of the justice motive: Antecedents of distributive and procedural justice. , 1994 .

[96]  M. Hauser.  Moral Minds: How Nature Designed Our Universal Sense of Right and Wrong , 2006 .

[97]  Lawrence M. Friedman,et al.  A History of American Law , 1973 .

[98]  T. Tyler,et al.  Psychological perspectives on legitimacy and legitimation. , 2006, Annual review of psychology.

[99]  R. Baumeister,et al.  The need to belong: desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. , 1995, Psychological bulletin.

[100]  H. Tajfel,et al.  Social categorization and intergroup behaviour , 1971 .

[101]  J. Gibson.  The Legitimacy of the U.S. Supreme Court in a Polarized Polity , 2007 .

[102]  M. Hogg,et al.  Attitudes, behavior, and social context: The role of norms and group membership in social influence processes , 2000 .

[103]  Eskridge,et al.  Challenging the Apartheid of the Closet: Establishing Conditions for Lesbian and Gay Intimacy, Nomos, and Citizenship, 1961-1981 , 1997 .

[104]  Timur Kuran.  Private Truths, Public Lies: The Social Consequences of Preference Falsification , 1995 .

[105]  Carl A. Kallgren,et al.  A Focus Theory of Normative Conduct: A Theoretical Refinement and Reevaluation of the Role of Norms in Human Behavior , 1991 .

[106]  Just punishments: Guideline sentences and normative consensus , 1997 .

[107]  Coffee,et al.  Paradigms Lost: The Blurring of the Criminal and Civil Law Models--And What Can Be Done About It , 1992 .

[108]  L. Berkowitz,et al.  Laws and Moral Judgments , 1967 .

[109]  J. Darley,et al.  Intuitions of Justice: Implications for Criminal Law and Justice Policy , 2007 .

[110]  Thad A. Brown,et al.  Self-Interest and Civilians' Attitudes Toward the Vietnam War , 1978 .

[111]  Dan M. Kahan,et al.  The Secret Ambition of Deterrence , 1999, Deterrence.

[112]  L. Kohlberg,et al.  Developing Senses of Law and Legal Justice , 1971 .

[113]  L. Kohlberg.  Essays On Moral Development , 1981 .

[114]  Muzafer Sherif,et al.  A study of some social factors in perception. , 1935 .

[115]  Janice Nadler,et al.  Testing the Focal Point Theory of Legal Compliance: The Effect of Third‐Party Expression in an Experimental Hawk/Dove Game , 2005 .

[116]  Stefanie F. Smith,et al.  Principals and accessories in capital felony-murder: The proportionality principle reigns supreme , 1993 .

[117]  Samuel R. Gross,et al.  Hardening of the Attitudes: Americans' Views on the Death Penalty , 1994 .

[118]  O. Holmes.  The Path of the Law , 1996 .

[119]  Dennis R. Longmire,et al.  Americans View Crime and Justice: A National Public Opinion Survey , 1996 .

[120]  C. Sunstein.  Social Norms and Social Roles , 1995 .

[121]  Duane T. Wegener,et al.  Matching Versus Mismatching Attitude Functions: Implications for Scrutiny of Persuasive Messages , 1998 .

[122]  H. Tajfel,et al.  The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior. , 2004 .

[123]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Representativeness revisited: Attribute substitution in intuitive judgment. , 2002 .

[124]  Kevin M. Carlsmith,et al.  Why do we punish? Deterrence and just deserts as motives for punishment. , 2002, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[125]  D. Gilbert,et al.  The correspondence bias. , 1995, Psychological bulletin.

[126]  Retribution and Revenge , 2000 .

[127]  R. MacCoun,et al.  Some Well-Aged Wines for the 'New Norm' Bottles , Implications of Social Psychology to Law and Economics , 2003 .

[128]  John M. Frost,et al.  Moral heuristics. Commentaries. Author's reply , 2005 .

[129]  Deborah A. Prentice,et al.  Pluralistic ignorance and alcohol use on campus: some consequences of misperceiving the social norm. , 1993, Journal of personality and social psychology.