Optimisation of LiDAR derived terrain models for river flow modelling

Abstract. Airborne LiDAR (Light Detection And Ranging) combines cost efficiency, high degree of automation, high point density of typically 1–10 points per m2 and height accuracy of better than ±15 cm. For all these reasons LiDAR is particularly suitable for deriving precise Digital Terrain Models (DTM) as geometric basis for hydrodynamic-numerical (HN) simulations. The application of LiDAR for river flow modelling requires a series of preprocessing steps. Terrain points have to be filtered and merged with river bed data, e.g. from echo sounding. Then, a smooth Digital Terrain Model of the Watercourse (DTM-W) needs to be derived, preferably considering the random measurement error during surface interpolation. In a subsequent step, a hydraulic computation mesh has to be constructed. Hydraulic simulation software is often restricted to a limited number of nodes and elements, thus, data reduction and data conditioning of the high resolution LiDAR DTM-W becomes necessary. We will present a DTM thinning approach based on adaptive TIN refinement which allows a very effective compression of the point data (more than 95% in flood plains and up to 90% in steep areas) while preserving the most relevant topographic features (height tolerance ±20 cm). Traditional hydraulic mesh generators focus primarily on physical aspects of the computation grid like aspect ratio, expansion ratio and angle criterion. They often neglect the detailed shape of the topography as provided by LiDAR data. In contrast, our approach considers both the high geometric resolution of the LiDAR data and additional mesh quality parameters. It will be shown that the modelling results (flood extents, flow velocities, etc.) can vary remarkably by the availability of surface details. Thus, the inclusion of such geometric details in the hydraulic computation meshes is gaining importance in river flow modelling.

[1]  W. E. Watt.  Twenty Years of Flood Risk Mapping Under the Canadian National Flood Damage Reduction Program , 2000 .

[2]  I. Dowman,et al.  TERRAIN SURFACE RECONSTRUCTION BY THE USE OF TETRAHEDRON MODEL WITH THE MDL CRITERION , 2002 .

[3]  Chengcui Zhang,et al.  A progressive morphological filter for removing nonground measurements from airborne LIDAR data , 2003, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[4]  Gottfried Mandlburger,et al.  Hydraulically related hydro‐morphological units: description based on a new conceptual mesohabitat evaluation model (MEM) using LiDAR data as geometric input , 2009 .

[5]  Günther Unfer,et al.  Morphodynamic Effects on the Habitat of Juvenile Cyprinids (Chondrostoma nasus) in a Restored Austrian Lowland River , 2008, Environmental management.

[6]  Karl Kraus,et al.  Photogrammetrie, Band 3, Topographische Informationssysteme , 2000 .

[7]  Abdul Aziz Khan,et al.  Two-Dimensional Depth-Averaged Models for Flow Simulation in River Bends , 2001, Int. J. Comput. Eng. Sci..

[8]  K. Kraus.  Photogrammetry: Geometry from Images and Laser Scans , 2007 .

[9]  F. Sotiropoulos,et al.  THREE DIMENSIONAL NUMERICAL MODEL FOR FLOW THROUGH NATURAL RIVERS , 1998 .

[10]  K. Kraus,et al.  Determination of terrain models in wooded areas with airborne laser scanner data , 1998 .

[11]  Joel H. Ferziger,et al.  Computational methods for fluid dynamics , 1996 .

[12]  N. Haala,et al.  Capture Andevaluation of Airborne Laser Scanner Data , 1996 .

[13]  Günter Blöschl,et al.  Das Katastrophenhochwasser vom 7. August 2002 am Kamp — Eine erste Einschätzung , 2002 .

[14]  Primo Zingaretti,et al.  Classification and filtering of laser data , 2003 .

[15]  N. Pfeifer,et al.  DERIVATION OF DIGITAL TERRAIN MODELS IN THE SCOP++ ENVIRONMENT , 2001 .

[16]  M. Elmqvist,et al.  TERRAIN MODELLING AND ANALYSIS USING LASER SCANNER DATA , 2001 .

[17]  P. Axelsson.  DEM Generation from Laser Scanner Data Using Adaptive TIN Models , 2000 .

[18]  George Vosselman,et al.  FILTERING OF AIRBORNE LASER SCANNER DATA BASED ON SEGMENTED POINT CLOUDS , 2005 .

[19]  N. Pfeifer,et al.  SEGMENTATION BASED ROBUST INTERPOLATION - A NEW APPROACH TO LASER DATA FILTERING , 2005 .

[20]  G. Vosselman.  SLOPE BASED FILTERING OF LASER ALTIMETRY DATA , 2000 .

[21]  Paul S. Heckbert,et al.  Survey of Polygonal Surface Simplification Algorithms , 1997 .

[22]  David A. Seal,et al.  The Shuttle Radar Topography Mission , 2007 .

[23]  Michael Doneus,et al.  Digital Terrain Modelling for Archaeological Interpretation within Forested Areas using Full-Waveform Laserscanning , 2006, VAST.

[24]  J. Shan,et al.  Topographic laser ranging and scanning : principles and processing , 2008 .

[25]  J. Marco.  Flood risk mapping , 1994 .

[26]  Charles K. Toth,et al.  Improvement of Lidar Data Accuracy Using Lidar-Specific Ground Targets , 2007 .

[27]  Jaime Hueso Gonzalez,et al.  TanDEM-X: A satellite formation for high-resolution SAR interferometry , 2007 .

[28]  A. Petrascheck,et al.  Analyse der Hochwasserereignisse vom August 2002 — FloodRisk , 2005 .

[29]  George Vosselman,et al.  Experimental comparison of filter algorithms for bare-Earth extraction from airborne laser scanning point clouds , 2004 .

[30]  P. Bates,et al.  3D numerical modelling of open-channel flow with submerged vegetation , 2001 .

[31]  O. Pironneau.  Finite Element Methods for Fluids , 1990 .

[32]  Lars T. Waser,et al.  High‐quality image matching and automated generation of 3D tree models , 2008 .

[33]  S. Filin.  Recovery of Systematic Biases in Laser Altimetry Data Using Natural Surfaces , 2003 .

[34]  K. Kraus,et al.  FROM SINGLE-PULSE TO FULL-WAVEFORM AIRBORNE LASER SCANNERS: POTENTIAL AND PRACTICAL CHALLENGES , 2004 .

[35]  A. Roth,et al.  The shuttle radar topography mission—a new class of digital elevation models acquired by spaceborne radar , 2003 .