Smart Investments in Sustainable Food Production: Revisiting Mixed Crop-Livestock Systems

Farmers in mixed crop-livestock systems produce about half of the world’s food. In small holdings around the world, livestock are reared mostly on grass, browse, and nonfood biomass from maize, millet, rice, and sorghum crops and in their turn supply manure and traction for future crops. Animals act as insurance against hard times and supply farmers with a source of regular income from sales of milk, eggs, and other products. Thus, faced with population growth and climate change, small-holder farmers should be the first target for policies to intensify production by carefully managed inputs of fertilizer, water, and feed to minimize waste and environmental impact, supported by improved access to markets, new varieties, and technologies.

[1]  B. Sen.  The State of Food and Agriculture , 1962 .

[2]  J. Lenters,et al.  Modeling the impact of hydrological changes on nitrate transport in the Mississippi River Basin from 1955 to 1994 , 2002 .

[3]  Ken E. Giller,et al.  Beyond resource constraints - Exploring the biophysical feasibility of options for the intensification of smallholder crop-livestock systems in Vihiga district, Kenya , 2009 .

[4]  Pius Chilonda,et al.  Geographical determinants and environmental implications of livestock production intensification in Asia. , 2005, Bioresource technology.

[5]  K. Sones,et al.  Poverty Reduction Through Animal Health , 2007, Science.

[6]  S. Carpenter,et al.  Science for managing ecosystem services: Beyond the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[7]  Suhas P. Wani,et al.  Rainfed Agriculture: Unlocking the Potential , 2009 .

[8]  D. Rees.  Agriculture at the crossroads. , 1990 .

[9]  Keith Paustian,et al.  Potential soil carbon sequestration in overgrazed grassland ecosystems , 2002 .

[10]  Claude B. Courbois,et al.  Livestock to 2020: The Next Food Revolution , 2001 .

[11]  John M. Antle,et al.  Can payments for ecosystem services secure the water tower of Tibet , 2008 .

[12]  Julian M. Alston,et al.  A meta-analysis of rates of return to agricultural R&D : ex pede Herculem? , 2000 .

[13]  A. Janvry,et al.  World development report 2008 : agriculture for development , 2008 .

[14]  J. Dixon,et al.  Feed, food and fuel: Competition and potential impacts on small-scale crop-livestock-energy farming systems , 2010 .

[15]  Peter B. R. Hazell,et al.  Returns to Public Investments in the Less-Favored Areas of India and China , 2001 .

[16]  Keith D. Shepherd,et al.  Bio-economic evaluation of farmers' perceptions of viable farms in western Kenya , 2006 .

[17]  W. Sutherland,et al.  Reaping the Benefits: Science and the sustainable intensification of global agriculture , 2009 .

[18]  W. Parton,et al.  Agricultural intensification and ecosystem properties. , 1997, Science.

[19]  Eric Viala,et al.  Water for food, water for life a comprehensive assessment of water management in agriculture , 2008 .

[20]  H. Steinfeld,et al.  Livestock's long shadow: environmental issues and options. , 2006 .

[21]  Jack A. Heinemann,et al.  Agriculture at a Crossroads , 2008, Science.

[22]  R. DeFries,et al.  Cropland expansion changes deforestation dynamics in the southern Brazilian Amazon , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[23]  R. Lal,et al.  Soil Carbon Sequestration Impacts on Global Climate Change and Food Security , 2004, Science.

[24]  S. Wood,et al.  Drivers of change in crop-livestock systems and their potential impacts on agro-ecosystems services and human well-being to 2030 , 2010 .