A benchmark for room acoustical simulation. Concept and database

Abstract Room acoustical simulations are usually evaluated by comparing them to measurements in corresponding physical environments as a benchmark. However, it proved to be challenging to provide a precise representation of the room geometry, the source and receiver characteristics, and the absorption and scattering coefficients to be re-modeled in the simulation. We aim to overcome these shortcomings by providing a database that can serve as a Benchmark for Room Acoustical Simulations (BRAS) and which is expandable and permanently available to researchers and developers of simulation software. The database includes a selection of reference scenes such as “single reflection”, or “diffraction around an infinite wedge” which isolate specific acoustic phenomena. This article introduces the concept of the BRAS along with the description of the currently contained acoustic scenes and discusses the implication of measurement errors. The acquisition of impulse responses for omnidirectional and binaural receivers, the identification of the boundary conditions, and the data structure is detailed in the database itself. The BRAS is publicly available 1 . The free license under which it is provided allows for future extensions such as additional scenes or improved data due to advanced measurement techniques.

[1]  Ravish Mehra,et al.  Efficient HRTF-based Spatial Audio for Area and Volumetric Sources , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[2]  C. Nocke In-situ acoustic impedance measurement using a free-field transfer function method , 2000 .

[3]  Lauri Savioja,et al.  Overview of geometrical room acoustic modeling techniques. , 2015, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  Stefan Weinzierl,et al.  The Influence of Room Acoustics on Solo Music Performance: An Experimental Study , 2015 .

[5]  Michael Vorländer,et al.  Quality assessment of room acoustic simulation tools by comparing binaural measurements and simulations in an optimized test scenario , 2011 .

[6]  E. Mommertz,et al.  Angle-dependent in-situ measurements of reflection coefficients using a subtraction technique , 1995 .

[7]  Thomas A. Funkhouser,et al.  Validating Acoustical Simulations in Bell Labs Box , 2002, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[8]  I. Bork Report on the 3rd round robin on room acoustical computer simulation - : Part II: Calculations , 2005 .

[9]  I. Bork Report on the 3rd round robin on room acoustical computer simulation - : Part I: Measurements , 2005 .

[10]  J. Ih,et al.  Influence of impedance phase angle on sound pressures and reverberation times in a rectangular room. , 2014, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  P Chevret Advantages of the incoherent uniform theory of diffraction for acoustic calculations in open-plan offices. , 2015, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  Michael Vorlnder,et al.  Auralization: Fundamentals of Acoustics, Modelling, Simulation, Algorithms and Acoustic Virtual Reality , 2020 .

[13]  Mcj Maarten Hornikx Ten questions concerning computational urban acoustics , 2016 .

[14]  Michael Vorländer,et al.  A High Resolution and Full-Spherical Head-Related Transfer Function Database for Different Head-Above-Torso Orientations , 2017 .

[15]  Shinichi Sakamoto,et al.  Constructing a database of computational methods for environmental acoustics , 2005 .

[16]  S. Marburg,et al.  A platform for benchmark cases in computational acoustics , 2015 .

[17]  Kazuhiro Takashima,et al.  Comparison of three measurement techniques for the normal absorption coefficient of sound absorbing materials in the free field. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  Arianna Astolfi,et al.  Combined effect of noise and room acoustics on vocal effort in simulated classrooms. , 2017, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[19]  Arcanjo Lenzi,et al.  A Review of the In Situ Impedance and Sound Absorption Measurement Techniques , 2015 .

[20]  Mendel Kleiner,et al.  Auralization-An Overview , 1993 .

[21]  Michael Vorländer,et al.  A round robin on room acoustical simulation and auralization. , 2019, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[22]  Jens Holger Rindel,et al.  Room Acoustic Modelling Techniques: A Comparison of a Scale Model and a Computer Model for a New Opera Theatre , 2011 .

[23]  Michael Vorländer,et al.  Influence of "omnidirectional" loudspeaker directivity on measured room impulse responses. , 2013, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[24]  Shuai Lu,et al.  The Influence of Shape Design on the Acoustic Performance of Concert Halls from the Viewpoint of Acoustic Potential of Shapes , 2016 .

[25]  Louena Shtrepi,et al.  Objective and perceptual assessment of the scattered sound field in a simulated concert hall. , 2015, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[26]  I. Bork,et al.  A comparison of room simulation software - The 2nd round robin on room acoustical computer simulation , 2000 .

[27]  Michael Vorländer,et al.  On the in situ impedance measurement with pu-probes--simulation of the measurement setup. , 2013, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[28]  Miguel Arana,et al.  Influence of the source orientation on the measurement of acoustic parameters in a large reverberant cathedral , 2007 .