Imposition of time-dependent boundary conditions in FEM formulations for elastodynamics: critical assessment of penalty-type methods

This paper is concerned with the variationally consistent incorporation of time dependent boundary conditions. The proposed methodology avoids ad hoc procedures and is applicable to both linear as well as nonlinear problems. An integral formulation of the dynamic problem serves as a basis for the imposition of the corresponding constraints, which are enforced via the consistent form of the penalty method, e.g. a form that complies with the norm and inner product of the functional space where the weak formulation is posed. Also, it is shown that well known and broadly implemented modelling techniques such as “large mass” and “large spring” methods, arise as limiting cases of the penalty formulation. Further extension of the proposed methodology is provided in the case where a generalized weak formulation of the dynamic problem with an independent velocity field is assumed. Finally, a few examples serve to illustrate the above concepts.

[1]  Leopold Alexander Pars,et al.  A Treatise on Analytical Dynamics , 1981 .

[2]  T. Hughes Reduction scheme for some structural eigenvalue problems by a variational theorem , 1976 .

[3]  D. Talaslidis,et al.  A rational approach to mass matrix diagonalization in two‐dimensional elastodynamics , 2004 .

[4]  Christos Panagiotopoulos,et al.  Rational derivation of conserving time integration schemes: The moving-mass case , 2008 .

[5]  G. D. Manolis,et al.  The temporal finite element method in structural dynamics , 1991 .

[6]  I. Babuska The Finite Element Method with Penalty , 1973 .

[7]  V. Arnold Mathematical Methods of Classical Mechanics , 1974 .

[8]  M. Géradin,et al.  Flexible Multibody Dynamics: A Finite Element Approach , 2001 .

[9]  C. Lanczos The variational principles of mechanics , 1949 .

[10]  T. Hughes,et al.  Space-time finite element methods for elastodynamics: formulations and error estimates , 1988 .

[11]  K. Bathe Finite Element Procedures , 1995 .

[12]  I. Babuska The finite element method with Lagrangian multipliers , 1973 .

[13]  R. Cook,et al.  Concepts and Applications of Finite Element Analysis , 1974 .

[14]  Linda R. Petzold,et al.  Numerical solution of initial-value problems in differential-algebraic equations , 1996, Classics in applied mathematics.

[15]  P. Paultre,et al.  Multiple-support seismic analysis of large structures , 1990 .

[16]  Raymond D. Mindlin,et al.  Beam Vibrations With Time-Dependent Boundary Conditions , 1989 .

[17]  R. Courant,et al.  Methods of Mathematical Physics , 1962 .

[18]  K. Rektorys Variational Methods in Mathematics, Science and Engineering , 1977 .

[19]  A. Ženíšek,et al.  Nonlinear elliptic and evolution problems and their finite element approximations , 1990 .

[20]  Wing Kam Liu,et al.  Nonlinear Finite Elements for Continua and Structures , 2000 .

[21]  G. Manolis,et al.  Velocity-based reciprocal theorems in elastodynamics and BIEM implementation issues , 2010 .

[22]  I. Stakgold Green's Functions and Boundary Value Problems , 1979 .

[23]  Alexander V. Idesman,et al.  SOLUTION OF LINEAR ELASTODYNAMICS PROBLEMS WITH SPACE-TIME FINITE ELEMENTS ON STRUCTURED AND UNSTRUCTURED MESHES , 2007 .