Design for Diversity: Evaluating the Context of Socially Mixed Neighbourhoods

It is argued that if planners are to recognize and support socially diverse neighbourhoods, it is important that they become better acquainted with both the form of diverse places, as well as the evaluation of that form. Thinking in these terms may also help planners adopt a particular language about diversity that is sensitive to the unique requirements of diverse places. A framework for evaluating the socially diverse neighbourhood from a design standpoint is suggested. Two sources are used: urban and community design that is specifically meant to create places that support social diversity; and ecological principles that are meant to improve the relationship between habitat and species diversity. This framework is applied to an evaluation of diverse areas in the city of Chicago and its surrounding suburbs. A multi-dimensional definition of diversity that includes income, race/ethnicity, age and family type is used. Forty-nine block groups satisfied the condition of being highly diverse in all four cate...

[1]  Michael T. Maly,et al.  Chapter 1 : Neighborhood Racial and Ethnic Diversity in U.S. Cities , 1998 .

[2]  G. Galster.  A Stock/Flow Model Of Defining Racially Integrated Neighborhoods , 1998 .

[3]  T. Angotti,et al.  Problems and Prospects for Healthy Mixed-use Communities in New York City , 2001 .

[4]  B. Hillier,et al.  The Social Logic of Space , 1984 .

[5]  S. Clampet-Lundquist,et al.  HOPE VI relocation: Moving to new neighborhoods and building new ties , 2004 .

[6]  R. Kaplan,et al.  The Experience of Nature: A Psychological Perspective , 1989 .

[7]  Michael T. Maly,et al.  The emergence of stable racially and ethnically diverse urban communities: A case study of nine U.S. cities , 1997 .

[8]  M. Orfield.  American Metropolitics: The New Suburban Reality , 2002 .

[9]  Mike Greenberg.  The poetics of cities : designing neighborhoods that work , 1995 .

[10]  Catharine Ward Thompson,et al.  Urban open space in the 21st century , 2002 .

[11]  R. Forman,et al.  Landscape Ecology Principles in Landscape Architecture and Land-Use Planning , 1996 .

[12]  Christopher Alexander,et al.  A New Theory of Urban Design , 1991 .

[13]  J. Jacobs.  The Death and Life of Great American Cities , 1962 .

[14]  John Yinger,et al.  Closed Doors, Opportunities Lost: The Continuing Costs of Housing Discrimination , 1995 .

[15]  Michael T. Maly.  The Neighborhood Diversity Index: A Complementary Measure of Racial Residential Settlement , 2000 .

[16]  John T. Metzger.  Planned abandonment: The neighborhood life‐cycle theory and national urban policy , 2000 .

[17]  L. Mumford.  The urban prospect : essays , 1968 .

[18]  Christopher Alexander,et al.  A New Theory of Urban Design , 1989 .

[19]  Sean Zielenbach,et al.  The Art of Revitalization: Improving Conditions in Distressed Inner-City Neighborhoods , 2000 .

[20]  E. H. Simpson.  Measurement of Diversity , 1949, Nature.

[21]  Alan Rowley,et al.  Mixed-use Development: Ambiguous concept, simplistic analysis and wishful thinking? , 1996 .

[22]  Dina R. Rose.  Social Disorganization and Parochial Control: Religious Institutions and Their Communities , 2000 .

[23]  Mary J. Fischer,et al.  The Geography of Inequality in the United States, 1950-2000 , 2003 .

[24]  Nikos A. Salingaros,et al.  Theory of the urban web , 1998 .

[25]  D. Hayden.  Building Suburbia: Green Fields and Urban Growth, 1820-2000 , 2003 .