Addressing Sustainability in Transportation Systems: Definitions, Indicators, and Metrics

Addressing the sustainability of transportation systems is an important activity as evidenced by a growing number of initiatives around the world to define and measure sustainability in transportation planning and infrastructure provision. This paper reviews major initiatives in North America, Europe, and Oceania. The purpose is to characterize the emergent thinking on what constitutes transportation sustainability and how to measure it. While there is no standard definition for transportation system sustainability, it is largely being defined through impacts of the system on the economy, environment, and general social well-being; and measured by system effectiveness and efficiency, and the impacts of the system on the natural environment. Frameworks based on important causal relationships between infrastructure and the broader environment, infrastructure impacts on the economy, environment, and social well-being; and the relative influence of agencies over causal factors, are largely being used to develop and determine indicator systems for measuring sustainability in transportation systems. Process-based approaches involve community representatives and other stakeholders in planning and present opportunities to educate the public and influence collective behaviors. These frameworks can be used collectively to help agencies refine their visions as well as develop policies, planning procedures, and measurement and monitoring systems for achieving sustainable transportation systems.

[1]  G. H. Brundtland World Commission on environment and development , 1985 .

[2]  Keith A. Wheeler,et al.  K-12 Sustainability Education: Its Status and Where Higher Education Should Intervene. , 2003 .

[3]  Heinz A. Preisig,et al.  Indicators for the sustainability assessment of wastewater treatment systems , 2002 .

[4]  Frans van de Ven,et al.  Different approaches to assessment of design and management of sustainable urban water systems , 2000 .

[5]  J. Kagan,et al.  Rational choice in an uncertain world , 1988 .

[6]  Dc Washington,et al.  USEPA. Reregistration Eligibility Decision (RED): 738‐R‐99‐004. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances (7508C): 337 pp. , 1999 .

[7]  Richard Ashley,et al.  Sewer systems and performance indicators-into the 21st century , 2002 .

[8]  A. Cortese THE CRITICAL ROLE OF HIGHER EDUCATION IN CREATING A SUSTAINABLE FUTURE , 2003 .

[9]  Henrik Gudmundsson,et al.  Indicators and performance measures for Transportation, Environment and Sustainability in North America: Report from a German Marshall Fund Fellowship 2000 individual study tour October2000 , 2001 .

[10]  Annie R. Pearce,et al.  Defining sustainability for built environment systems: an operational framework , 2002 .

[11]  Elizabeth Deakin,et al.  Sustainable Development & Sustainable Transportation: Strategies for Economic Prosperity, Environmental Quality, and Equity , 2001 .

[12]  A. Páez,et al.  Sustainable Urban transportation: Performance indicators and some analytical approaches , 2002 .

[13]  Raul Carlson,et al.  Environmental Performance Indicators , 2002 .

[14]  Joseph M. Sussman,et al.  SCENARIO PLANNING FOR STRATEGIC REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLANNING , 2004 .

[15]  Laurence J. Jacobs,et al.  A Civil Engineering Curriculum for the Future: The Georgia Tech Case , 2000 .

[16]  Annie R. Pearce Sustainability and the built environment :a metric and process for prioritizing improvement opportunities , 1999 .

[17]  David Simmonds,et al.  Procedures for Recommending Optimal Sustainable Planning of European City Transport Systems , 2002 .

[18]  Indicators Task Force A report on Canada's progress towards a national set of environmental indicators , 1991 .

[19]  Stuart Smith Devising Environment and Sustainable Development Indicators for Canada , 2002 .