Why do objects appear enlarged under water

Objects appear enlarged in water by less than the 4/3 angular magnification. They usually appear beyond their optical distance and slightly enlarged in linear size, but not in accordance with size-distance invariance (SDI). We investigated whether misperceptions of angular size could explain the discrepancies. Twenty observers viewed targets of various sizes and distances within transparent tanks 40 cm long containing air or water. They judged distance by hidden reaching, and linear or angular size by adjusting the size of a target in air at a further distance. Matched distance was close to physical distance in air and optical distance in water. All size matches were close to true linear size, and were larger in water than in air. Angular size matches were much too small to explain departures from SDI. Size perception under water is best explained by incomplete adaptation to optical distortion, and by the use of various size cues.

[1]  D. McCready.  On size, distance, and visual angle perception , 1985, Perception & psychophysics.

[2]  Helen E. Ross,et al.  The Mystery of the Moon Illusion: Exploring Size Perception , 2002 .

[3]  H E Ross,et al.  Adaptation of divers to size distortion under water. , 1970, British journal of psychology.

[4]  Leslie Welch,et al.  The precision of size constancy , 1992, Vision Research.

[5]  R. Thouless,et al.  Apparent size and distance in vision through a magnifying system. , 1968, British journal of psychology.

[6]  Irvin Rock.  Adaptation to a minified image , 1965 .

[7]  Helen E. Ross,et al.  Adaptation and counteradaptation to complex optical distortion , 1972 .

[8]  A. Higashiyama,et al.  How accurate is size and distance perception for very far terrestrial objects? Function and causality , 1994, Perception & psychophysics.

[9]  Helen E. Ross,et al.  Levels of Processing in the Size-Distance Paradox , 2003 .

[10]  Jo Ann S. Kinney.  Human underwater vision : physiology and physics , 1985 .

[11]  Helen E. Ross,et al.  Size-distance invariance in perceptual adaptation , 1970 .

[12]  R N Haber,et al.  The independence of size perception and distance perception , 2001, Perception & psychophysics.

[13]  S M Luria,et al.  Estimates of size and distance underwater. , 1967, The American journal of psychology.

[14]  D. McCready,et al.  Moon illusions redescribed , 1986, Perception & psychophysics.

[15]  W. Epstein,et al.  The current status of the size-distance hypotheses. , 1961, Psychological bulletin.

[16]  H E Ross.  Water, fog and the size-distance invariance hypothesis. , 1967, British journal of psychology.

[17]  G P Bingham,et al.  Distortions in definite distance and shape perception as measured by reaching without and with haptic feedback. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[18]  Adaptation to Optically Reduced Size , 1982, Perception.

[19]  H. Ross.  The Size-Constancy of Underwater Swimmers , 1965, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[20]  M. Hershenson,et al.  Visual Space Perception: A Primer , 1998 .

[21]  J. Jastrow,et al.  Experimental Psychology and Culture. , 1903 .

[22]  H. Kaneko,et al.  Perceived Angular and Linear Size: The Role of Binocular Disparity and Visual Surround , 1997, Perception.

[23]  S. M. Luria,et al.  Conflicting visual and tactual-kinesthetic stimulation , 1970 .