Assessment of the most reliable sites in mandibular bone for the best deoxyribonucleic acid yield for expeditive human identification in forensics

Background: In recent years, the techniques used to identify human remains post accidents, trauma or in case of criminal investigation have been expanded, improved and rendered more complex by the emergence of technologies based on deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) analysis. In the head and neck area, tooth has been proven to be the best quantitative source for DNA but in certain cases where the mandible specimen is edentulous or the tooth is extensively destroyed with caries, large dental restorations, mobile, or if they show any perimortem or postmortem fractures, sampling of such tooth specimen is usually avoided. In such situations, bone is considered the next best site for DNA analysis. Mandible being the largest, strongest and dense cortical bone is the most prominent facial bone that can be easily disarticulated. It can be analyzed for the best short tandem repeat (STR) segment qualitative amplification using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) technique for forensic analysis which can be used for gender and age determination. Aim: The aim of this study is to determine the best site for optimum quantitative and qualitative yield of DNA for amplification using specific and standard STR segment by conventional PCR technique. Methodology: Fifteen mandibular samples exposed to different environmental conditions were collected. Bone pieces of 1 cm × 1 cm were cut from each mandible from three sites, i.e., the ramus, angle and body, wherein the genomic DNA was isolated and was subjected to PCR using restricted number of 25 cycles. Results: The STR segment D3S1358 from clone RP11-438F9 used for the study showed very good amplification in restricted number of PCR cycles in the ramus region with number of repeats in every 15th genomic region. Conclusion: This study highlights the use of mandibular bone for the expeditive human identification. As per the study, the ramus of the mandible gave high quantitative and qualitative yield of DNA with thick amplification band of the STR segment as compared to the body and angle of the mandible. Thus ramus of the mandible can be preferred over other sites for molecular forensic investigations.

[1]  K. Satyapal,et al.  Morphometric analysis of the mandible in the Durban Metropolitan population of South Africa. , 2017, Folia morphologica.

[2]  G. Calacal,et al.  Comparing different post-mortem human samples as DNA sources for downstream genotyping and identification. , 2015, Forensic science international. Genetics.

[3]  John M. Butler,et al.  U.S. initiatives to strengthen forensic science & international standards in forensic DNA , 2015, Forensic science international. Genetics.

[4]  Damir Marjanović,et al.  Identification of human remains from the Second World War mass graves uncovered in Bosnia and Herzegovina , 2015, Croatian medical journal.

[5]  B. Budowle,et al.  Autosomal and Y-STR analysis of degraded DNA from the 120-year-old skeletal remains of Ezekiel Harper. , 2014, Forensic science international. Genetics.

[6]  J. Romeika,et al.  Recent Advances in Forensic DNA Analysis , 2014 .

[7]  Richard Li,et al.  Genetic Markers for Sex Identification in Forensic DNA Analysis , 2014 .

[8]  J. Murray Mandible fractures and dental trauma. , 2013, Emergency medicine clinics of North America.

[9]  S. Lokanadham,et al.  Sex determination & morphometric parameters of human mandible , 2013 .

[10]  M. Piglionica,et al.  Extraction of DNA From Bones in Cases Where Expectations for Success Are Low , 2012, The American journal of forensic medicine and pathology.

[11]  M. David,et al.  Mandibular ramus: An indicator for sex determination - A digital radiographic study , 2012, Journal of forensic dental sciences.

[12]  S. Jurel Role of Dentist in Forensic Investigations , 2012 .

[13]  Eske Willerslev,et al.  DNA in ancient bone - where is it located and how should we extract it? , 2012, Annals of anatomy = Anatomischer Anzeiger : official organ of the Anatomische Gesellschaft.

[14]  Mariusz Goniewicz,et al.  Current genetic methodologies in the identification of disaster victims and in forensic analysis , 2011, Journal of Applied Genetics.

[15]  M. Mahesh,et al.  DNA profiling and forensic dentistry--a review of the recent concepts and trends. , 2011, Journal of forensic and legal medicine.

[16]  W. Haak,et al.  Survival and recovery of DNA from ancient teeth and bones , 2011 .

[17]  Joseph A. Prahlow,et al.  Introduction to Forensic Sciences , 2010 .

[18]  John M. Butler,et al.  Fundamentals of Forensic DNA Typing , 2009 .

[19]  T. Saraswathi Shafer′s textbook of oral pathology , 2009, Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology.

[20]  Z. Szczerkowska,et al.  [Personal identification of an unknown individual based on determination of his DNA profile from exhumed remains]. , 2008, Archiwum medycyny sadowej i kryminologii.

[21]  Katja Drobniè PCR ANALYSIS OF DNA FROM SKELETAL REMAINS IN CRIME INVESTIGATION CASE , 2008 .

[22]  T. Parsons,et al.  Success rates of nuclear short tandem repeat typing from different skeletal elements. , 2007, Croatian medical journal.

[23]  R. H. A. da Silva,et al.  USE OF DNA TECHNOLOGY IN FORENSIC DENTISTRY , 2007, Journal of applied oral science : revista FOB.

[24]  D. Muñoz,et al.  A Qualitative Study of Compact Bone Microstructure and Nuclear Short Tandem Repeat Obtained From Femur of Human Remains Found on the Ground and Exhumed 3 Years After Death , 2005, The American journal of forensic medicine and pathology.

[25]  J. Yunis,et al.  Different dental tissues as source of DNA for human identification in forensic cases. , 2003, Croatian medical journal.

[26]  Stefanie Ritz-Timme,et al.  Extraction and amplification of nuclear and mitochondrial DNA from ancient and artificially aged bones. , 2003, Legal medicine.

[27]  John M. Butler,et al.  Forensic DNA typing : biology & technology behind STR markers , 2001 .

[28]  A. Chamberlain,et al.  Extraction of single-copy nuclear DNA from forensic specimens with a variety of postmortem histories. , 1997, Journal of forensic sciences.

[29]  A. Akane,et al.  Purification of forensic specimens for the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis. , 1993, Journal of forensic sciences.

[30]  J. Laidlaw,et al.  ANATOMY OF THE HUMAN BODY , 1967, The Ulster Medical Journal.

[31]  H. Montgomery,et al.  Diseases of the Skin , 1920, The Indian Medical Gazette.

[32]  J. T. Pilcher,et al.  Diseases of the Skin , 1903, The Indian Medical Gazette.