Latin square design for chip length machine vision measurement system analysis

ABSTRACT Machine vision systems are widely employed to provide data for analysis and interpretation in many industries, where measurement system analysis (MSA) is used to ensure the validity of these data. In a common MSA, each part is measured by each operator several times, resulting in a two-factor crossed design. However, when other factors in machine vision system must be considered, the MSA becomes more complex. In a chip length vision system, chip locations, chip placement angles, and variability among different chips have been identified as factors that influence measurement variability. A full factorial crossed design on this vision system would call for 1536 trials and cost about 32 hr, which is unacceptable to the practitioners. However, by designing a replicated Latin square experiment, which omits the interaction effects, the number of trials is dramatically reduced to 96 runs. Then, ANOVA is used to estimate variance components. %P/T and are the criteria to finally determine the capability of this machine vision system. The Latin square method for MSA is verified by simulation and applied to a chip manufacturing application.

[1]  G. Newman,et al.  CONFIDENCE INTERVALS , 1987, The Lancet.

[2]  Patrick Perret,et al.  The influence of relational complexity and strategy selection on children's reasoning in the Latin Square Task , 2011 .

[3]  Douglas P. Mader,et al.  THE ECONOMIC EVIPACT OF MEASUREMENT ERROR , 1999 .

[4]  Margaret J. Robertson,et al.  Design and Analysis of Experiments , 2006, Handbook of statistics.

[5]  N. Birch,et al.  ANALYSIS OF A TWO-FACTOR R& R STUDY WITH FIXED OPERATORS , 1998 .

[6]  Yukti Gupta,et al.  REVIEW ON LATIN SQUARE , 2014 .

[7]  Richard K. Burdick,et al.  Confidence Intervals for a Discrimination Ratio in a Gauge R&R Study with Three Random Factors , 2003 .

[8]  Israel A. Wagner,et al.  A Linear-Time Constant-Space Algorithm for the Boundary Fill Problem , 2007, Comput. J..

[9]  Karl D. Majeske,et al.  Approval Criteria for Multivariate Measurement Systems , 2008 .

[10]  Connie M. Borror,et al.  A Review of Methods for Measurement Systems Capability Analysis , 2003 .

[11]  Albert Trip,et al.  Gauge R&R Studies for Destructive Measurements , 2005 .

[12]  Eric R. Ziegel,et al.  Statistical Case Studies for Industrial Process Improvement , 1997 .

[13]  Stephen L. R. Ellison,et al.  Use of a replicated Latin square design in a homogeneity test for high purity organic melting point standards , 2012, Accreditation and Quality Assurance.

[14]  A. Shaji,et al.  Measurement system analysis , 2006, Third IEEE International Workshop on Electronic Design, Test and Applications (DELTA'06).

[15]  Douglas C. Montgomery,et al.  GAUGE CAPABILITY AND DESIGNED EXPERIMENTS. PART I: BASIC METHODS , 1993 .

[16]  Anand M. Joglekar,et al.  Measurement Systems Analysis , 2005 .

[17]  Douglas P. Mader,et al.  The Economic Impact of Measurement Error , 1999 .

[18]  S. M. Dunn,et al.  Feeding high proportions of barley grain stimulates an inflammatory response in dairy cows. , 2008, Journal of dairy science.

[19]  Kenji Suzuki,et al.  Linear-time connected-component labeling based on sequential local operations , 2003, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..

[20]  Karl D. Majeske,et al.  Approving Vision-Based Measurement Systems in the Presence of Within-Part Variation , 2012 .

[21]  Fred Spiring,et al.  Introduction to Statistical Quality Control , 2007, Technometrics.