Attempts to share information between public sector organisations over time: A case-based exploration of value conflicts

Despite the importance of inter-organisational information sharing (IOIS) in the public sector, such endeavours often fail. Existing research has shown that the values held by collaborating organisations are one important factor affecting these kinds of initiatives. However, research has sought only to a limited extent to address how value conflicts come into play over time. Therefore, this paper aims to explore how conflicting values shape an inter-organisational information-sharing practice in the public sector over time. Using the local/global network framework, we analyse four years’ worth of information sharing in an inter-organisational advisory group in the context of Swedish nuclear waste management. We conclude that different value conflicts are emphasised to different extents at different points in time. That is, values do not uniformly affect IOIS activities, and such conflicts over time reduce the set of potential IOIS activities. We also conclude that when IOIS activities are driven by an individual organisation’s values, individual value rational activities may co-exist with a dysfunctional long-term IOIS practice.

[1]  Tung-Mou Yang,et al.  To open or not to open? Determinants of open government data , 2015, J. Inf. Sci..

[2]  Debbie Harrison,et al.  Path Dependence, Agency and Technological Evolution , 2002, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[3]  A. R. A. Dahlan,et al.  The government information sharing (GIS) in natural disaster management and risk reduction , 2013, 2013 5th International Conference on Information and Communication Technology for the Muslim World (ICT4M).

[4]  Amy L. Landers Technology Law - What Every Business (and Business-Minded Person) Needs to Know by Mark Grossman, (Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc. 2003) , 2007, Int. J. Law Inf. Technol..

[5]  Richard T. Watson,et al.  Analyzing the Past to Prepare for the Future: Writing a Literature Review , 2002, MIS Q..

[6]  Theresa A. Pardo,et al.  Governance Structures in Cross-Boundary Information Sharing: Lessons from State and Local Criminal Justice Initiatives , 2008, Proceedings of the 41st Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS 2008).

[7]  Sue R. Faerman,et al.  The Effect of Organizational/Technological Factors and the Nature of Knowledge on Knowledge Sharing , 2006, Proceedings of the 39th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'06).

[8]  Seok-Jin Eom,et al.  Information Sharing Success in Korean Metropolitan Governments: Combining Multi-level Factors with Fuzzy-set Analysis , 2017, DG.O.

[9]  Muhammad Mustafa Kamal,et al.  Inter-organisational electronic information sharing in local g2g settings: a socio-technical issue , 2011, ECIS.

[10]  Tung-Mou Yang,et al.  Exploring the determinants of cross-boundary information sharing in the public sector: An e-Government case study in Taiwan , 2014, J. Inf. Sci..

[11]  Thanos Papadopoulos,et al.  Stakeholder Network Dynamics and Emergent Trajectories of Lean Implementation Projects: A Study in the UK National Health Service , 2008 .

[12]  José Ramón Gil-García,et al.  Collaborative digital government in Mexico: Some lessons from federal Web-based interorganizational information integration initiatives , 2007, Gov. Inf. Q..

[13]  José Ramón Gil-García,et al.  Government inter-organizational information sharing initiatives: Understanding the main determinants of success , 2016, Gov. Inf. Q..

[14]  Hsinchun Chen,et al.  Information Sharing and Collaboration Policies within Government Agencies , 2004, ISI.

[15]  Monique Snoeck,et al.  Removing the Blinkers: What a Process View Learns About G2G Information Systems in Flanders , 2015, EGOV.

[16]  Zhang Pengzhu,et al.  A Field Study of G2G Information Sharing in Chinese Context Based on the Layered Behavioral Model , 2009, 2009 42nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[17]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  Interpretive case studies in IS research: nature and method , 1995 .

[18]  Juha Hintsa,et al.  Drivers and barriers affecting usage of e-Customs - A global survey with customs administrations using multivariate analysis techniques , 2013, Gov. Inf. Q..

[19]  Hans Jochen Scholl,et al.  Process integration, information sharing, and system interoperation in government: A comparative case analysis , 2012, Gov. Inf. Q..

[20]  A. Lips,et al.  Cross-Agency Collaboration in New Zealand: An Empirical Study of Information Sharing Practices, Enablers and Barriers in Managing for Shared Social Outcomes , 2011 .

[21]  Marianne J. Koch,et al.  Information Sharing in and Across Government Agencies , 2004 .

[22]  H Hkansson,et al.  Path-Dependence: Restricting Or Facilitating Technical Development? , 2002 .

[23]  Anthony M. Cresswell,et al.  Participants' Expectations and the Success of Knowledge Networking in the Public Sector , 2002 .

[24]  José Ramón Gil-García,et al.  Analyzing the Influence of Governance Structure Determinants on the Success of Inter-organizational Information Sharing Initiatives , 2015, 2015 48th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[25]  James L. Perry,et al.  The Public-Private Distinction in Organization Theory: A Critique and Research Strategy , 1988 .

[26]  Tung-Mou Yang The complexity of cross-boundary information sharing: an organizational perspective on Taiwan e-government , 2012, ICEGOV.

[27]  Theresa A. Pardo,et al.  Building Collaborative Digital Government Systems - Systemic constraints and effective practices , 2002, Advances in Digital Government.

[28]  Jonathan P. Allen,et al.  Value conflicts for information security management , 2011, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[29]  InduShobha N. Chengalur-Smith,et al.  Collaborative e-Government: impediments and benefits of information-sharing projects in the public sector , 2007, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[30]  Richard Heeks,et al.  Understanding e-Government project trajectories from an actor-network perspective , 2007, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[31]  Theresa A. Pardo,et al.  Trust in Government Cross-Boundary Information Sharing Initiatives: Identifying the Determinants , 2010, 2010 43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[32]  Ruth Sara Aguilar-Savén,et al.  Business process modelling: Review and framework , 2004 .

[33]  M. Patton,et al.  Qualitative evaluation and research methods , 1992 .

[34]  S. Dawes,et al.  Expectations and Perceptions of Benefits, Barriers, and Success in Public Sector Knowledge Networks , 2006 .

[35]  José Ramón Gil-García,et al.  Determinants of Clarity of Roles and Responsibilities in Interagency Information Integration and Sharing (IIS) , 2016, EGOV.

[36]  David Landsbergen,et al.  Realizing the Promise: Government Information Systems and the Fourth Generation of Information Technology , 2001 .

[37]  Tung-Mou Yang,et al.  Information-sharing in public organizations: A literature review of interpersonal, intra-organizational and inter-organizational success factors , 2011, Gov. Inf. Q..

[38]  Benjamin L. Schooley,et al.  Towards end-to-end government performance management: Case study of interorganizational information integration in emergency medical services (EMS) , 2007, Gov. Inf. Q..

[39]  Marie-Helen Maras,et al.  Overcoming the intelligence-sharing paradox: Improving information sharing through change in organizational culture , 2017 .

[40]  Pengzhu Zhang,et al.  A Field Study of G2G Information Sharing in Chinese Context Based on the Layered Behavioral Model , 2009 .

[41]  Jane Fedorowicz,et al.  A collaborative network for first responders: Lessons from the CapWIN case , 2007, Gov. Inf. Q..

[42]  S. Dawes Interagency information sharing: Expected benefits, manageable risks , 1996 .

[43]  José Ramón Gil-García,et al.  The Mediating Role of Trust for Inter-Organizational Information Sharing (IIS) Success in the Public Sector , 2017, DG.O.

[44]  Theresa A. Pardo,et al.  Computing and Information Technology Challenges for 21st Century Financial Market Regulators , 2011, EGOV.

[45]  Wiebe E. Bijker,et al.  Science in action : how to follow scientists and engineers through society , 1989 .

[46]  José Ramón Gil-García,et al.  Exploring E-Government Benefits and Success Factors , 2007 .

[47]  Fredrik Karlsson,et al.  Inter-organisational information sharing in the public sector: A longitudinal case study on the reshaping of success factors , 2017, Gov. Inf. Q..

[48]  Theresa A. Pardo,et al.  Multinational E-Government Collaboration, Information Sharing, and Interoperability: An Integrative Model , 2010, 2010 43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[49]  Susan Gasson,et al.  A genealogical study of boundary-spanning IS design , 2006, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[50]  Muhammad Mustafa Kamal,et al.  Electronic information sharing in local government authorities: Factors influencing the decision-making process , 2013, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[51]  Lei Zheng,et al.  Sharing information for product quality and food safety in China: barriers and enablers , 2008, ICEGOV '08.

[52]  Asli Yagmur Akbulut,et al.  To share or not to share? Examining the factors influencing local agency electronic information sharing , 2009, Int. J. Bus. Inf. Syst..

[53]  Shuchih Ernest Chang,et al.  Exploring organizational culture for information security management , 2007, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[54]  G. Anthony Gorry,et al.  Creating a knowledge-sharing community: if you build it, will they come? , 2003, CACM.

[55]  Sharon S. Dawes,et al.  Transnational public sector knowledge networks: Knowledge and information sharing in a multi-dimensional context , 2012, Gov. Inf. Q..

[56]  Anthony M. Cresswell,et al.  Interorganizational Information Integration in the Criminal Justice Enterprise: Preliminary Lessons from State and County Initiatives , 2005, Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[57]  Sergio de Cesare,et al.  Information sharing through inter‐organisational systems in local government , 2013 .

[58]  Craig B. Caldwell,et al.  Understanding Research on Values in Business , 1999 .

[59]  Anthony M. Cresswell,et al.  Modeling the social & technical processes of interorganizational information integration , 2004, 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2004. Proceedings of the.

[60]  L. Caffrey Information Sharing between and within Governments , 2000 .

[61]  A. Cresswell,et al.  From "Need to Know" to "Need to Share": Tangled Problems, Information Boundaries, and the Building of Public Sector Knowledge Networks , 2009 .

[62]  Perri,et al.  Information-Sharing and Confidentiality in Social Policy: Regulating Multi-Agency Working , 2008 .

[63]  Soon Ae Chun,et al.  Government information sharing and integration: Combining the social and the technical , 2009, Inf. Polity.

[64]  David C. Yen,et al.  G2G information sharing among government agencies , 2014, Inf. Manag..

[65]  Sharon S. Dawes,et al.  Knowledge and Information Sharing in Transnational Knowledge Networks: A Contextual Perspective , 2011, 2011 44th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[66]  Wing Lam,et al.  Barriers to e-government integration , 2005, J. Enterp. Inf. Manag..

[67]  Theresa A. Pardo,et al.  Characterizing the importance of clarity of roles and responsibilities in government inter-organizational collaboration and information sharing initiatives , 2019, Gov. Inf. Q..

[68]  Pär J. Ågerfalk,et al.  Business Action and Information Modeling - the Task of the Next Millennium , 2001, Information Modeling in the New Millennium.

[69]  Theresa A. Pardo,et al.  Interorganizational information integration: A key enabler for digital government , 2007, Gov. Inf. Q..

[70]  Sharon S. Dawes,et al.  Conceptualizing knowledge and information sharing in transnational knowledge networks , 2010, ICEGOV '10.

[71]  Kasey J. Martin,et al.  Navigating the Transparency–Privacy Paradox in Public Sector Data Sharing , 2016 .

[72]  M. Patton Qualitative evaluation and research methods, 2nd ed. , 1990 .

[73]  Jing Zhang,et al.  Exploring stakeholders' expectations of the benefits and barriers of e-government knowledge sharing , 2005, J. Enterp. Inf. Manag..

[74]  Stan Karanasios,et al.  Information sharing and interoperability: the case of major incident management , 2014, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[75]  Peter Kawalek,et al.  Information systems and partnership in multi-agency networks: an action research project in crime reduction , 2004, Inf. Organ..

[76]  JinKyu Lee,et al.  Exploring the causes and effects of inter-agency information sharing systems adoption in the anti/counter-terrorism and disaster management domains , 2007, DG.O.

[77]  José Ramón Gil-García,et al.  Understanding the determinants of success in inter-organizational information sharing initiatives: results from a national survey , 2014, DG.O.