Factors Affecting Public Acceptance of Wind Turbines in Sweden

Wind power is growing in Sweden, but the high-level of opposition to turbine proposals has meant that many proposals are never realised. This opposition in a country that has a measured 74% support for wind power leads to questions being raised as to what is causing this opposition. Many have suggested that it is due to prevalent NIMBY attitudes; this, however, is only one factor affecting the public acceptance of turbines. The over-riding factor is the spatial distance between the costs incurred and the benefits derived from wind power. Perceived need for wind power, level of participation, individual considerations of visual impact and the amount to which the local community benefits determine the realisation of turbine proposals.

[1]  Maarten Wolsink,et al.  Entanglement of Interests and Motives: Assumptions behind the NIMBY-theory on Facility Siting , 1994 .

[2]  P. Morthorst Capacity development and profitability of wind turbines , 1999 .

[3]  M. Dale Strickland,et al.  Avian Collisions with Wind Turbines: A Summary of Existing Studies and Comparisons to Other Sources of Avian Collision Mortality in the United States , 2001 .

[4]  Lennart Söder,et al.  Wind energy technology and current status : a review , 2000 .

[5]  Poul Erik Morthorst,et al.  The development of a green certificate market , 2000 .

[6]  Søren Krohn,et al.  On public attitudes towards wind power , 1999 .

[7]  Gordon Walker,et al.  Renewable energy and the public , 1995 .

[8]  Amulya K. N. Reddy,et al.  Energy After Rio: Prospects and Challenges , 1997 .

[9]  K. Sinclair Status of Avian Research at the National Renewable Energy Laboratory , 2001 .

[10]  Ion Paraschivoiu,et al.  Environmental, social and economic aspects of wind energy , 2000, Collection of Technical Papers. 35th Intersociety Energy Conversion Engineering Conference and Exhibit (IECEC) (Cat. No.00CH37022).

[11]  Paul Brickhill,et al.  Reach for the sky , 1954 .

[12]  G. Hunt,et al.  A pilot golden eagle population study in the Altamont Pass Wind Resource Area, California , 1995 .

[13]  James F. Manwell,et al.  Book Review: Wind Energy Explained: Theory, Design and Application , 2006 .

[14]  Lennart Söder,et al.  An overview of wind energy-status 2002 , 2002 .

[15]  A. Brunt,et al.  The Development of Wind Power in Denmark and The Uk , 1998 .

[16]  Inga Carlman,et al.  Wind power in Denmark! Wind power in Sweden? , 1988 .

[17]  Per Dannemand Andersen,et al.  Review of historical and modern utilization of wind power , 1998 .

[18]  M. Grubb Renewable energy strategies for Europe. Volume 1: foundations and context , 1995 .

[19]  C. T. Unseld,et al.  Public Opinion About Energy , 1980 .

[20]  Amanda Jacob Wind energy — the fuel of the future , 2001 .

[21]  Maarten Wolsink,et al.  Wind power and the NIMBY-myth: institutional capacity and the limited significance of public support , 2000 .

[22]  Christian L Krause,et al.  Our visual landscape: Managing the landscape under special consideration of visual aspects , 2001 .

[23]  David Elliott,et al.  Energy, society, and environment , 1997 .

[24]  J. van der Straaten,et al.  Classics in Environmental Studies , 1996 .

[25]  Declan Butler,et al.  Power to the people , 2004, Nature.

[26]  Skjold Rechenbach Nielsen Wind energy planning in Denmark , 1996 .

[27]  Gordon Walker,et al.  Renewable energy in the UK:The cinderella sector transformed? , 1997 .

[28]  J Walsh,et al.  Going with the wind. , 1986, Science.

[29]  B. Farhar,et al.  Trends in US Public Perceptions and Preferences on Energy and Environmental Policy , 1994 .

[30]  M. Grubb Renewable Energy Strategies for Europe , 1995 .

[31]  W. Freudenburg,et al.  NIMBYs and LULUs: Stalking the Syndromes , 1992 .

[32]  P. Gipe Wind Energy Comes of Age , 1995 .

[33]  M. Evans,et al.  Important bird areas in Europe : priority sites for conservation , 2000 .

[34]  Maarten Wolsink,et al.  Dutch wind power policy : Stagnating implementation of renewables , 1996 .

[35]  A. Zervos,et al.  Wind power development in Europe , 2001, Proc. IEEE.

[36]  Jesper Munksgaard,et al.  Socio-economic assessment of wind power--lessons from Denmark , 1998 .

[37]  Paul Gipe,et al.  The Wind Industry’s Experience with Aesthetic Criticism , 2017 .

[38]  J. Mulherin,et al.  Of special concern. , 1992, RDH.