Influence of the limited detector size on spatial variations of the reconstruction accuracy in holographic tomography

Holographic tomography (HT) allows noninvasive, quantitative, 3D imaging of transparent microobjects, such as living biological cells and fiber optics elements. The technique is based on acquisition of multiple scattered fields for various sample perspectives using digital holographic microscopy. Then, the captured data is processed with one of the tomographic reconstruction algorithms, which enables 3D reconstruction of refractive index distribution. In our recent works we addressed the issue of spatially variant accuracy of the HT reconstructions, which results from the insufficient model of diffraction that is applied in the widely-used tomographic reconstruction algorithms basing on the Rytov approximation. In the present study, we continue investigating the spatially variant properties of the HT imaging, however, we are now focusing on the limited spatial size of holograms as a source of this problem. Using the Wigner distribution representation and the Ewald sphere approach, we show that the limited size of the holograms results in a decreased quality of tomographic imaging in off-center regions of the HT reconstructions. This is because the finite detector extent becomes a limiting aperture that prohibits acquisition of full information about diffracted fields coming from the out-of-focus structures of a sample. The incompleteness of the data results in an effective truncation of the tomographic transfer function for the out-of-center regions of the tomographic image. In this paper, the described effect is quantitatively characterized for three types of the tomographic systems: the configuration with 1) object rotation, 2) scanning of the illumination direction, 3) the hybrid HT solution combing both previous approaches.

[1]  T. Kozacki,et al.  Computation of diffracted fields for the case of high numerical aperture using the angular spectrum method. , 2012, Applied optics.

[2]  Franz Hlawatsch,et al.  The Wigner distribution : theory and applications in signal processing , 1997 .

[3]  S. Kou,et al.  Image formation in holographic tomography: high-aperture imaging conditions. , 2009, Applied optics.

[4]  Piotr Makowski,et al.  Generalized total variation iterative constraint strategy in limited angle optical diffraction tomography. , 2016, Optics express.

[5]  C. Fang-Yen,et al.  Optical diffraction tomography for high resolution live cell imaging. , 2009, Optics express.

[6]  A. J. Devaney,et al.  Spectral representations for free space propagation of complex phase perturbations of optical fields , 1975 .

[7]  P. Marquet,et al.  Marker-free phase nanoscopy , 2013, Nature Photonics.

[8]  Thomas J. Naughton,et al.  Resolution limits in practical digital holographic systems , 2009 .

[9]  Tomasz Kozacki,et al.  Computational and experimental study on accuracy of off-axis reconstructions in optical diffraction tomography , 2015 .

[10]  T. Claasen,et al.  THE WIGNER DISTRIBUTION - A TOOL FOR TIME-FREQUENCY SIGNAL ANALYSIS , 1980 .

[11]  E. Wolf Three-dimensional structure determination of semi-transparent objects from holographic data , 1969 .

[12]  Jens Flügge,et al.  Comparison of resolution in tomographic diffractive microscopy using combinations of sample rotation and illumination rotation , 2011, BiOS.

[13]  A. Devaney A Filtered Backpropagation Algorithm for Diffraction Tomography , 1982 .

[14]  Yun-Seong Jeon,et al.  Rotation error correction by numerical focus adjustment in tomographic phase microscopy , 2009 .

[15]  Youngchan Kim,et al.  Common-path diffraction optical tomography for investigation of three-dimensional structures and dynamics of biological cells. , 2014, Optics express.

[16]  Tomasz Kozacki,et al.  Off-axis illumination in object-rotation diffraction tomography for enhanced alignment and resolution , 2015, Optical Metrology.

[17]  Tomasz Kozacki,et al.  On resolution and viewing of holographic image generated by 3D holographic display. , 2010, Optics express.

[18]  Malgorzata Kujawinska,et al.  Tomographic and numerical studies of polymer bridges between two optical fibers for telecommunication applications , 2014 .

[19]  J. Kostencka,et al.  Accurate approach to capillary-supported optical diffraction tomography. , 2015, Optics express.

[20]  A. Kuś,et al.  Advances in design and testing of limited angle optical diffraction tomographysystem for biological applications , 2016, SPIE BiOS.

[21]  Jong Chul Ye,et al.  Comparative study of iterative reconstruction algorithms for missing cone problems in optical diffraction tomography. , 2015, Optics express.

[22]  W. Górski,et al.  Tomographic imaging of photonic crystal fibers. , 2007, Optics letters.

[23]  Mor Habaza,et al.  Tomographic phase microscopy with 180° rotation of live cells in suspension by holographic optical tweezers. , 2015, Optics letters.

[24]  J. Kostencka,et al.  Noise suppressed optical diffraction tomography with autofocus correction. , 2014, Optics express.

[25]  Tomasz Kozacki,et al.  Holographic tomography with scanning of illumination: space-domain reconstruction for spatially invariant accuracy. , 2016, Biomedical optics express.