Assessing venture capital investments with noncompensatory behavioral decision models

Abstract This article examines the prospect of a decision support system for the assessment of venture capital investments. It approaches the task of developing decision models from the perspective of the venture capitalist. Thus venture capitalists have played an active role in defining the predictor variables and in providing data on their own investments. Venture capitalists (and recent research) underscore the importance of the entrepreneur in new ventures and the predictor variables selected reflect this bias. The literature is now replete with studies demonstrating the superiority of multiattribute actuarial models over human judgment for diverse decision environments, ranging from medical science to finance. This class of behavioral decision models consists of the simultaneous consideration of several attributes relevant to a decision. Actuarial models of this kind can be applied to attribute and decision data based on the decision maker's judgments (i.e., expected outcomes) before the events transpire—termed judgment-based models. They can also be applied to data on past events or actual outcomes where known—termed environment-based models. Again, it needs to be emphasized that actuarial models, whether based on the decision maker's judgments or on the environment, usually outperform the decision maker. These general principles are applied here. Among actuarial models a particular subclass of models is called noncompensatory. In these models, a low value for one attribute cannot be compensated by a high value for another attribute. As an example. in selecting a place-kicker in football, athletic skills other than kicking ability are irrelevant. In this study, two types of noncompensatory actuarial models, conjunctive and disjunctive, are used to model both venture capitalists' judgments and the environment. Interviews with venture capitalists reveal that some place strong emphasis on one or two attributes in judging a potential investment. This type of decision-making behavior indicates a disjunctive decision process. At the same time, there can be a tendency to ensure that a prospective investment is satisfactory at a minimum the entrepreneur's tenacity/courage is a redundant variable that is sublimated in desire for success and enthusiasm/capacity for work.

[1]  K. R. Hammond Probabilistic functioning and the clinical method. , 1955, Psychological review.

[2]  R. Dawes A case study of graduate admissions: Application of three principles of human decision making. , 1971 .

[3]  Lewis R. Goldberg,et al.  Man versus model of man: A rationale, plus some evidence, for a method of improving on clinical inferences. , 1970 .

[4]  R. Dawes,et al.  Linear models in decision making. , 1974 .

[5]  Michaela. Palmer,et al.  The Application of Psychological Testing to Entrepreneurial Potential , 1971 .

[6]  Richard Staelin,et al.  Judgment Based Marketing Decision Models: An Experimental Investigation of the Decision Calculus Approach , 1979 .

[7]  E. G. French Motivation as a variable in work-partner selection. , 1956, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[8]  E. Brunswik,et al.  The Conceptual Framework of Psychology , 1954 .

[9]  R. Ashton An Experimental Study of Internal Control Judgments , 1974 .

[10]  R. D'Andrade,et al.  The psychosocial origins of achievement motivation. , 1959 .

[11]  H. J. Einhorn The use of nonlinear, noncompensatory models in decision making. , 1970, Psychological bulletin.

[12]  P. Slovic,et al.  An analysis-of-variance model for the assessment of configural cue utilization in clinical judgment. , 1968, Psychological bulletin.

[13]  Howard H. Stevenson,et al.  Capital market myopia , 1985 .

[14]  Ching-Tai Shih,et al.  On country risk: Some preliminary results , 1985 .

[15]  Tyzoon T. Tyebjee,et al.  A Model of Venture Capitalist Investment Activity , 1984 .

[16]  Edward J. Joyce,et al.  Expert Judgment In Audit Program Planning , 1976 .

[17]  D. Mcclelland,et al.  N ACHIEVEMENT AND ENTREPRENEURSHIP: A LONGITUDINAL STUDY. , 1965, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[18]  P. Slovic Analyzing the expert judge: A descriptive study of a stockbroker's decision process. , 1969 .

[19]  H. J. Einhorn,et al.  A Simple Multiattribute Utility Procedure for Evaluation , 1977 .

[20]  Ian C. MacMillan,et al.  Criteria distinguishing successful from unsuccessful ventures in the venture screening process , 1987 .

[21]  Ian C. MacMillan,et al.  Criteria Used by Venture Capitalists to Evaluate New Venture Proposals , 1985 .

[22]  Ward Edwards,et al.  Dynamic Decision Theory and Probabilistic Information Processings1 , 1962 .

[23]  Shelby H. McIntyre,et al.  An Experimental Study of the Impact of Judgment-Based Marketing Models , 1982 .

[24]  D. L. Sexton,et al.  The Entrepreneur: A Capable Executive and More , 1985 .

[25]  Hillel J. Einhorn,et al.  Expert measurement and mechanical combination , 1972 .

[26]  John W. Payne,et al.  Task complexity and contingent processing in decision making: An information search and protocol analysis☆ , 1976 .