Cosine Tuning Minimizes Motor Errors

Cosine tuning is ubiquitous in the motor system, yet a satisfying explanation of its origin is lacking. Here we argue that cosine tuning minimizes expected errors in force production, which makes it a natural choice for activating muscles and neurons in the final stages of motor processing. Our results are based on the empirically observed scaling of neuromotor noise, whose standard deviation is a linear function of the mean. Such scaling predicts a reduction of net force errors when redundant actuators pull in the same direction. We confirm this prediction by comparing forces produced with one versus two hands and generalize it across directions. Under the resulting neuromotor noise model, we prove that the optimal activation profile is a (possibly truncated) cosinefor arbitrary dimensionality of the workspace, distribution of force directions, correlated or uncorrelated noise, with or without a separate cocontraction command. The model predicts a negative force bias, truncated cosine tuning at low muscle cocontraction levels, and misalignment of preferred directions and lines of action for nonuniform muscle distributions. All predictions are supported by experimental data.

[1]  G. Sutton,et al.  The variation of hand tremor with force in healthy subjects , 1967, The Journal of physiology.

[2]  F. Zajac,et al.  The effect of activation history on tension production by individual muscle units , 1976, Brain Research.

[3]  H. Zelaznik,et al.  Motor-output variability: a theory for the accuracy of rapid motor acts. , 1979, Psychological review.

[4]  E. Fetz,et al.  Postspike facilitation of forelimb muscle activity by primate corticomotoneuronal cells. , 1980, Journal of neurophysiology.

[5]  A P Georgopoulos,et al.  On the relations between the direction of two-dimensional arm movements and cell discharge in primate motor cortex , 1982, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[6]  P. Viviani,et al.  The law relating the kinematic and figural aspects of drawing movements. , 1983, Acta psychologica.

[7]  N. Hogan An organizing principle for a class of voluntary movements , 1984, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[8]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Parallel distributed processing: explorations in the microstructure of cognition, vol. 1: foundations , 1986 .

[9]  R A Abrams,et al.  Optimality in human motor performance: ideal control of rapid aimed movements. , 1988, Psychological review.

[10]  A. P. Georgopoulos,et al.  Primate motor cortex and free arm movements to visual targets in three- dimensional space. III. Positional gradients and population coding of movement direction from various movement origins , 1988, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[11]  J. Kalaska,et al.  A comparison of movement direction-related versus load direction- related activity in primate motor cortex, using a two-dimensional reaching task , 1989, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[12]  F. Zajac Muscle and tendon: properties, models, scaling, and application to biomechanics and motor control. , 1989, Critical reviews in biomedical engineering.

[13]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Distributed Representations , 1986, The Philosophy of Artificial Intelligence.

[14]  R Caminiti,et al.  Making arm movements within different parts of space: the premotor and motor cortical representation of a coordinate system for reaching to visual targets , 1991, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[15]  Michael A. Arbib,et al.  A computational description of the organization of human reaching and prehension , 1992 .

[16]  D. Cj Decomposition of the EMG signal into constituent motor unit action potentials. , 1995 .

[17]  B. Conway,et al.  Synchronization between motor cortex and spinal motoneuronal pool during the performance of a maintained motor task in man. , 1995, The Journal of physiology.

[18]  M. E. Anderson,et al.  Directional variation of spatial and temporal characteristics of limb movements made by monkeys in a two-dimensional work space. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[19]  C. D. De Luca Decomposition of the EMG signal into constituent motor unit action potentials. , 1995, Muscle & nerve.

[20]  Herman P. Snippe,et al.  Parameter Extraction from Population Codes: A Critical Assessment , 1996, Neural Computation.

[21]  O. Kiehn,et al.  Prolonged firing in motor units: evidence of plateau potentials in human motoneurons? , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.

[22]  C. Marsden,et al.  Frequency peaks of tremor, muscle vibration and electromyographic activity at 10 Hz, 20 Hz and 40 Hz during human finger muscle contraction may reflect rhythmicities of central neural firing , 1997, Experimental Brain Research.

[23]  U Herrmann,et al.  Directional Tuning of Single Motor Units , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[24]  Daniel M. Wolpert,et al.  Signal-dependent noise determines motor planning , 1998, Nature.

[25]  W. Rymer,et al.  Decorrelating actions of Renshaw interneurons on the firing of spinal motoneurons within a motor nucleus: a simulation study. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.

[26]  A. P. Georgopoulos,et al.  Variability and Correlated Noise in the Discharge of Neurons in Motor and Parietal Areas of the Primate Cortex , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[27]  Michael I. Jordan,et al.  Smoothness maximization along a predefined path accurately predicts the speed profiles of complex arm movements. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.

[28]  Terrence J. Sejnowski,et al.  Neuronal Tuning: To Sharpen or Broaden? , 1999, Neural Computation.

[29]  Peter E. Latham,et al.  Narrow Versus Wide Tuning Curves: What's Best for a Population Code? , 1999, Neural Computation.

[30]  L M Harrison,et al.  The sharing principle. , 1999, Progress in brain research.

[31]  T J Sejnowski,et al.  A Theory of Geometric Constraints on Neural Activity for Natural Three-Dimensional Movement , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[32]  Y Uno,et al.  Quantitative examinations of internal representations for arm trajectory planning: minimum commanded torque change model. , 1999, Journal of neurophysiology.

[33]  N. Hogan,et al.  Probability density of the surface electromyogram and its relation to amplitude detectors , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[34]  D. Hoffman,et al.  Step-tracking movements of the wrist. IV. Muscle activity associated with movements in different directions. , 1999, Journal of neurophysiology.

[35]  T. Ebner,et al.  Cerebellar Purkinje Cell Simple Spike Discharge Encodes Movement Velocity in Primates during Visuomotor Arm Tracking , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[36]  Bagrat Amirikian,et al.  Directional tuning profiles of motor cortical cells , 2000, Neuroscience Research.

[37]  E. Todorov Direct cortical control of muscle activation in voluntary arm movements: a model , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[38]  K. Slavin Peripheral and Spinal Mechanisms in the Neural Control of Movement , 2000 .

[39]  Tamar Flash,et al.  Computational approaches to motor control , 2001, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[40]  M. Bethge,et al.  Optimal neural rate coding leads to bimodal firing rate distributions. , 2003, Network.

[41]  Terence D Sanger,et al.  Neural population codes , 2003, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[42]  Jianfeng Feng,et al.  A study on an optimal movement model , 2003 .

[43]  James Gordon,et al.  Accuracy of planar reaching movements , 1994, Experimental Brain Research.

[44]  P. Morasso Spatial control of arm movements , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[45]  J. Gordon,et al.  Accuracy of planar reaching movements , 1994, Experimental Brain Research.

[46]  W. L. Nelson Physical principles for economies of skilled movements , 1983, Biological Cybernetics.