On Propagation in Loop Quantum Gravity

A rigorous implementation of the Wheeler-Dewitt equations was derived in the context of Loop Quantum Gravity (LQG) and was coined Quantum Spin Dynamics (QSD). The Hamiltonian constraint of QSD was criticised as being too local and to prevent “propagation” in canonical LQG. That criticism was based on an algorithm developed for QSD for generating solutions to the Wheeler-DeWitt equations. The fine details of that algorithm could not be worked out because the QSD Hamiltonian constraint makes crucial use of the volume operator which cannot be diagonalised analytically. In this paper, we consider the U(1) model for Euclidean vacuum LQG which consists in replacing the structure group SU(2) by U(1) and otherwise keeps all properties of the SU(2) theory intact. This enables analytical calculations and the fine details of the algorithm can be worked out. By considering one of the simplest possible non-trivial class of solutions based on very small graphs, we show that 1. an infinite number of solutions exist which are 2. generically not normalisable with respect to the inner product on the space of spatially diffeomorphism invariant distributions and 3. generically display propagation. Due to the closeness of the U(1) model to Euclidean LQG, it is extremely likely that all three properties hold also in the SU(2) case and even more so in physical Lorentzian LQG. These arguments can in principle be made water tight using modern numerical (e.g. ML or QC) methods combined with the techniques developed in this paper which we reserve for future work.

[1]  Quantum spin dynamics (QSD): II. The kernel of the Wheeler - DeWitt constraint operator , 1996, gr-qc/9606090.

[2]  L. Glaser,et al.  Quantum Gravity on the Computer: Impressions of a Workshop , 2018, Universe.

[3]  R. Laflamme,et al.  Quantum spacetime on a quantum simulator , 2017, Communications Physics.

[4]  J. Mielczarek Prelude to Simulations of Loop Quantum Gravity on Adiabatic Quantum Computers , 2021 .

[5]  E. Álvarez,et al.  Quantum Gravity , 2004, gr-qc/0405107.

[6]  Quantum spin dynamics: VIII. The master constraint , 2005, gr-qc/0510011.

[7]  AndreescuAndrica An Introduction to Diophantine Equations , 2002 .

[8]  M. Varadarajan Euclidean LQG dynamics: an electric shift in perspective , 2021, 2101.03115.

[9]  Quantization of diffeomorphism invariant theories of connections with local degrees of freedom , 1995, gr-qc/9504018.

[10]  Casey Tomlin,et al.  Towards an Anomaly-Free Quantum Dynamics for a Weak Coupling Limit of Euclidean Gravity , 2012, 1210.6869.

[11]  Uniqueness of Diffeomorphism Invariant States on Holonomy–Flux Algebras , 2005, gr-qc/0504147.

[12]  Quantum Spin Dynamics (QSD) , 1996, gr-qc/9606089.

[13]  K. Giesel,et al.  Scalar material reference systems and loop quantum gravity , 2012, 1206.3807.

[14]  T. Thiemann Quantum spin dynamics (QSD): III. Quantum constraint algebra and physical scalar product in quantum , 1998 .

[15]  Anomaly-free formulation of non-perturbative, four-dimensional Lorentzian quantum gravity , 1996, gr-qc/9606088.

[16]  B. Dittrich A First Course in Loop Quantum Gravity , 2012 .

[17]  A. Ashtekar,et al.  Gravitational Dynamics—A Novel Shift in the Hamiltonian Paradigm , 2020, Universe.

[18]  J. Lewandowski,et al.  Symmetric scalar constraint for loop quantum gravity , 2014, 1410.5276.

[19]  S. Steinhaus,et al.  Decorated tensor network renormalization for lattice gauge theories and spin foam models , 2014, 1409.2407.

[20]  Christian Fleischhack Communications in Mathematical Physics Representations of the Weyl Algebra in Quantum Geometry , 2008 .

[21]  J. W. Thomas Numerical Partial Differential Equations: Finite Difference Methods , 1995 .

[22]  M. Varadarajan Towards an Anomaly-Free Quantum Dynamics for a Weak Coupling Limit of Euclidean Gravity: Diffeomorphism Covariance , 2012, 1210.6877.

[23]  Alok Laddha Hamiltonian constraint in Euclidean LQG revisited: First hints of off-shell Closure , 2014, 1401.0931.

[24]  M. Varadarajan Quantum propagation in Smolin’s weak coupling limit of 4D Euclidean gravity , 2019, Physical Review D.

[25]  M. Varadarajan Propagation in polymer parameterised field theory , 2016, 1609.06034.

[26]  Claus Kiefer,et al.  Modern Canonical Quantum General Relativity , 2008 .

[27]  A. Ashtekar,et al.  Background independent quantum gravity: a status report , 2004 .

[28]  T. Thiemann Canonical Quantum Gravity, Constructive QFT, and Renormalisation , 2020, Frontiers in Physics.

[29]  Towards the QFT on curved spacetime limit of QGR: I. A general scheme , 2002, gr-qc/0207030.

[30]  Thomas Fischbacher,et al.  SO(8) supergravity and the magic of machine learning , 2019, Journal of High Energy Physics.

[31]  Muxin Han,et al.  Loop quantum gravity on dynamical lattice and improved cosmological effective dynamics with inflaton , 2021, Physical Review D.

[32]  T. Thiemann,et al.  Simplification of the spectral analysis of the volume operator in loop quantum gravity , 2004, gr-qc/0405060.

[33]  Michael Creutz,et al.  Quarks, Gluons and Lattices , 1984 .

[34]  L. Smolin The classical limit and the form of the hamiltonian constraint in non-perturbative quantum general relativity , 2008 .