Comparison of Experiments and Calculations of Void Fraction Distributions in Randomly Stacked Pebble Beds

In pebble bed reactors the fuel forms a randomly stacked pebble bed with non-uniform fuel densities, affecting neutronics (streaming) and thermodynamics (wall channeling). To investigate these effects, computational tools are needed capable of generating realistic pebble beds, and experimental results to validate these tools. Using gamma-ray scanning the absolute 0 and radial void fraction profile r(r) of a randomly stacked pebble bed was measured. Results were used to validate three different methods: Discrete Elements Method (DEM), Monte Carlo (MC) rejection method, and expanding system method. The bed consisted of 5457 acrylic pebbles with a diameter d = 12.7 mm in an acrylic cylinder with diameter D = 229 mm (D/d = 18.0), and had an average void fraction 0 = 0.395. The radial void fraction profile showed large, dampened oscillations near the wall extending up to five pebble diameters into the pebble bed, with a minimum void fraction of 0.22 half a pebble diameter away from the wall. The MC rejection method resulted in a 0 much higher than measured, and could not reproduce well the oscillations in r observed in the experiment. Both the DEM and expanding system method showed excellent agreement with the experiment for both 0 and r, with the expanding system method having the benefit of creating pebble beds with no overlapping pebbles, suitable for exact pebble bed models in other codes.

[1]  C. Rycroft,et al.  Analysis of granular flow in a pebble-bed nuclear reactor. , 2006, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[2]  D. Kilgour,et al.  The density of random close packing of spheres , 1969 .

[3]  Gary Edward Mueller,et al.  Radial void fraction distributions in randomly packed fixed beds of uniformly sized spheres in cylindrical containers , 1992 .

[4]  Joshua J. Cogliati,et al.  PEBBLES: A COMPUTER CODE FOR MODELING PACKING, FLOW AND RECIRCULATIONOF PEBBLES IN A PEBBLE BED REACTOR , 2006 .

[5]  William W. Schertz,et al.  Thermal and material transport in nonisothermal packed beds , 1969 .

[6]  P. L. Spedding,et al.  SIMULATION OF PACKING DENSITY AND LIQUID FLOW IN FIXED BEDS , 1995 .

[7]  R. Athey COEFFICIENT OF FRICTION , 1993 .

[8]  P. Mrafko HOMOGENEOUS AND ISOTROPIC HARD SPHERE MODEL OF AMORPHOUS METALS , 1980 .

[9]  Paul Meakin,et al.  Random packings of spheres built with sequential models , 1992 .

[10]  J. Lieberoth,et al.  Neutron Streaming in Pebble Beds , 1980 .

[11]  J. P. Groen,et al.  Radial void fraction measurement of a random multisized pebble stacking , 2009 .

[12]  Florian Huber,et al.  Numerical simulations of single phase reacting flows in randomly packed fixed-bed reactors and experimental validation , 2003 .

[13]  R. F. Benenati,et al.  Void fraction distribution in beds of spheres , 1962 .

[14]  Zongxin Wu,et al.  The design features of the HTR-10 , 2002 .

[15]  Wim J. J. Soppe,et al.  Computer simulation of random packings of hard spheres , 1990 .

[16]  A. M. Ougouag,et al.  Comparison and Extension of Dancoff Factors for Pebble-Bed Reactors , 2007 .

[17]  J. S. Goodling,et al.  Radial porosity distribution in cylindrical beds packed with spheres , 1983 .