Rice postharvest learning alliance in Cambodia: comparison of assumptions and implementation of a network approach

ABSTRACT Research projects employ the learning alliance (LA) approach but there is scepticism that its rhetoric is not evident in practice. The authors examined a case of an implemented LA, comparing its outcomes with assumptions from the project and its conceptual design to evaluate the implementation of an LA. Data were from interviews and network maps of actors involved, as well as farmers and town-level actors in Battambang and Pursat, Cambodia. An LA approach can promote actor–network processes that target social, technical, and institutional reordering. Assumptions about the approach, however, may lead projects to emphasize scaling out and direct efforts away from processes that enable innovation.

[1]  Laurens Klerkx,et al.  Unravelling the role of innovation platforms in supporting co-evolution of innovation: Contributions and tensions in a smallholder dairy development programme , 2013 .

[2]  P. Mapfumo,et al.  Interaction patterns determining improved information and knowledge sharing among smallholder farmers participating in field-based learning alliances in eastern Zimbabwe , 2013 .

[3]  S. Smith,et al.  Learning and Action Alliances to build capacity for flood resilience , 2012 .

[4]  The role of materiality in apprenticeships: the case of the Suame Magazine, Kumasi, Ghana , 2011 .

[5]  Cees Leeuwis,et al.  Rethinking Communication in Innovation Processes: Creating Space for Change in Complex Systems , 2011 .

[6]  C. Leeuwis,et al.  Adaptive management in agricultural innovation systems: The interactions between innovation networks and their environment , 2010 .

[7]  C. Leeuwis.  Changing views of agricultural innovation: implications for communication intervention and science , 2010 .

[8]  P. Trott,et al.  WHY 'OPEN INNOVATION' IS OLD WINE IN NEW BOTTLES , 2009, International Journal of Innovation Management.

[9]  Boru Douthwaite,et al.  Understanding how participatory approaches foster innovation , 2009 .

[10]  R. Lefroy,et al.  Facilitating a multi-stakeholder learning alliance: a case study describing the activities, outputs and impact of the Pig Systems Development Alliance in Lao PDR , 2009 .

[11]  Werner W. Stür,et al.  Establishing learning alliances between extension organisations: Key learnings from Laos. , 2009 .

[12]  Joep Verhagen,et al.  Learning alliances for integrated and sustainable innovations in urban water management , 2008 .

[13]  Gabrielle Durepos.  Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor‐Network‐Theory , 2008 .

[14]  M. Lundy,et al.  Learning alliances : building multi-stakeholder innovation systems in agro-enterprise development , 2008 .

[15]  M.N.C. Aarts,et al.  Creativity, planning and organizational change , 2007 .

[16]  S. Álvarez,et al.  Participatory Impact Pathways Analysis: A Practical Application of Program Theory in Research-for-Development , 2007, Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation.

[17]  S. G. Sherwood,et al.  FFSs in translation: Scaling up in name, but not in meaning. , 2007 .

[18]  Frits W.T. Penning de Vries.  Learning Alliances for the broad implementation of an integrated approach to multiple sources, multiple uses and multiple users of water , 2006 .

[19]  Andrew Hall,et al.  Enhancing agricultural innovation : how to go beyond the strengthening of research systems , 2006 .

[20]  M. Lundy,et al.  Learning alliances : an approach for building multistakeholder innovation systems , 2005 .

[21]  B. Adolph.  Learning how to do things differently: challenges in sharing tacit knowledge for agricultural and rural development (with examples from India and Namibia) , 2005 .

[22]  C. Leeuwis.  Communication for Rural Innovation: Rethinking Agricultural Extension , 2004 .

[23]  C. Leeuwis,et al.  Communication for Rural Innovation , 2004 .

[24]  M. Lundy.  Learning Alliances with Development Partners : A Framework for Scaling Out Research Results , 2004 .

[25]  Andrew Hall,et al.  From measuring impact to learning institutional lessons: an innovation systems perspective on improving the management of international agricultural research , 2003 .

[26]  Boru Douthwaite,et al.  Enabling Innovation: A Practical Guide to Understanding and Fostering Technological Change , 2002 .

[27]  J. Law.  After Ant: Complexity, Naming and Topology , 1999 .

[28]  Larissa Mezentseff,et al.  Learning alliances ‐ a new dimension of strategic alliances , 1997 .

[29]  Mark C. Suchman.  Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches , 1995 .

[30]  Madeleine Akrich,et al.  The De-scription of Technical Objects , 1992 .

[31]  M. Callon,et al.  Engineering and Sociology in a Military Aircraft Project: A Network Analysis of Technological Change , 1988 .

[32]  Donald A. Schön,et al.  Theory in Practice: Increasing Professional Effectiveness , 1976 .