Use of enzyme immunoassays and the latex agglutination test to measure the temporal appearance of immunoglobulin G and M antibodies after natural infection or immunization with rubella virus

The time course of appearance of antibodies after infection with rubella virus was determined with an immunoglobulin G (IgG) detection enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, a latex agglutination test, and an IgM detection enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. In six naturally infected rubella patients and 26 vaccinees, antibodies measured by either the IgG enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay or the latex agglutination test generally appeared in parallel with those detected by the hemagglutination inhibition test. By 28 days after inoculation of live virus vaccine and by 2 days postonset of clinical rubella symptoms caused by natural infection, antibodies were found by the two tests for all individuals. A commercially available enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kit was used to detect rubella-specific IgM. After natural infection, IgM appeared earlier than IgG, and although IgM titers decreased rapidly postinfection, in four of five patients antibodies were still detectable 40 to 43 days after the onset of clinical symptoms. After vaccine-induced infection, rubella-specific IgM was lower in titer than after natural infection and was detected in only three of seven vaccinees 70 days post-immunization.

[1]  A. Truant,et al.  Comparison of an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay with indirect hemagglutination and hemagglutination inhibition for determination of rubella virus antibody: evaluation of immune status with commercial reagents in a clinical laboratory , 1983, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[2]  A. Weissfeld,et al.  New latex agglutination test for rapid determination of rubella immune status , 1982, Journal of clinical microbiology.

[3]  J. Meegan,et al.  Comparison of the latex agglutination test with the hemagglutination inhibition test, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, and neutralization test for detection of antibodies to rubella virus , 1982, Journal of clinical microbiology.

[4]  E. Peterson,et al.  Detection of rubella antibodies by hemagglutination inhibition, indirect fluorescent-antibody test, and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay , 1981, Journal of clinical microbiology.

[5]  J. Sever,et al.  Evaluation of commercially available diagnostic test kits for rubella. , 1981, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[6]  S. Chantler,et al.  ENZYME IMMUNOASSAY FOR DETECTION OF RUBELLA SPECIFIC IgM ANTIBODY , 1981, The Lancet.

[7]  G. Enders,et al.  Class-specific determination of antibodies against cytomegalo (CMV) and rubella virus by ELISA. , 1981, Journal of biological standardization.

[8]  N. Cremer,et al.  Comparison of the Hemagglutination Inhibition Test and an Indirect Fluorescent-Antibody Test for Detection of Antibody to Rubella Virus in Human Sera , 1980, Journal of clinical microbiology.

[9]  J. Best,et al.  Rubella immunity by four different techniques: results of challenge studies , 1980, Journal of medical virology.

[10]  A. Vaheri,et al.  Evaluation of solid‐phase enzyme‐lmmunoassay procedure in immunity surveys and diagnosis of rubella , 1980, Journal of medical virology.

[11]  P. Tournier,et al.  Hemagglutination inhibition, single radial hemolysis, and ELISA tests for the detection of IgG and IgM to rubella virus , 1980, Journal of medical virology.

[12]  A. Voller,et al.  A comparison of three tests for rubella antibody screening. , 1979, Journal of clinical pathology.

[13]  B. Forghani,et al.  Antigen requirements, sensitivity, and specificity of enzyme immunoassays for measles and rubella viral antibodies , 1979, Journal of clinical microbiology.

[14]  P. Leinikki,et al.  Determination of virus-specific IgM antibodies by using ELISA: elimination of false-positive results with protein A-Sepharose absorption and subsequent IgM antibody assay. , 1978, The Journal of laboratory and clinical medicine.

[15]  W. Andiman,et al.  Neutralizing and hemagglutination-inhibiting antibodies to rubella virus as indicators of protective immunity in vaccinees and naturally immune individuals. , 1978, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[16]  A. Ley,et al.  Detection of antibody to rubella virus by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. , 1977, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[17]  A. Voller,et al.  Enzyme immunoassays for viral diseases. , 1977, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[18]  O. Meurman,et al.  Solid-phase radioimmunoassay of rubella virus immunoglobulin M antibodies: comparison with sucrose density gradient centrifugation test , 1977, Journal of clinical microbiology.

[19]  A. Voller,et al.  Enzyme-immunoassays for antibodies in measles, cytomegalovirus infections and after rubella vaccination. , 1976, British journal of experimental pathology.

[20]  A. Voller,et al.  A simple method for detecting antibodies to rubella. , 1975, British journal of experimental pathology.

[21]  D. S. Dane,et al.  PERSISTENCE OF SPECIFIC IgM AFTER NATURAL INFECTION WITH RUBELLA VIRUS , 1975, The Lancet.

[22]  P. Ogra,et al.  Antibody response in serum and nasopharynx after naturally acquired and vaccine-induced infection with rubella virus. , 1971, The New England journal of medicine.

[23]  H. Liebhaber Measurement of rubella antibody by hemagglutination inhibition. II. Characteristics of an improved HAI test employing a new method for the removal of non-immunoglobulin HA inhibitors from serum. , 1970, Journal of immunology.