Genetic mixing facilitates adaptation to a novel environmental constraint

Climate change can affect the length and timing of seasons, which in turn can alter the time available for insects to complete their life cycles and successfully reproduce. Intraspecific hybridization between individuals from genetically distinct populations, or admixture, can boost fitness in populations experiencing environmental challenges. Admixture can particularly benefit small and isolated populations that may have high genetic load by masking deleterious alleles, thereby immediately increasing fitness, and also by increasing the genetic variation available for adaptive evolution. To evaluate the effects of admixture on populations exposed to a novel life cycle constraint, we used the red flour beetle, Tribolium castaneum, as a model system. Distinct laboratory lineages were kept isolated or mixed together to create populations containing 1–4 lineages. We then compared the fitness of admixed populations to 1‐lineage populations while subjecting them to a shortened generation time for three generations. Admixture did not influence fitness after two generations. In contrast, in the third generation, admixed populations had significantly greater fitness compared with 1‐lineage populations. The timing of the increase in fitness for the admixed populations suggests that adaptation to the novel environmental constraint occurred in the experimental populations. Our study highlights the importance of admixture for facilitating rapid adaptation to changes in seasonality, and more broadly to environmental change.

[1]  B. Melbourne,et al.  Population demographic history and evolutionary rescue: Influence of a bottleneck event , 2023, bioRxiv.

[2]  M. Cristescu,et al.  Genotype diversity promotes the persistence of Daphnia populations exposed to severe copper stress , 2022, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[3]  P. Hedrick,et al.  The crucial role of genome-wide genetic variation in conservation , 2021, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[4]  S. Tavener,et al.  The power of evolutionary rescue is constrained by genetic load , 2017, Evolutionary applications.

[5]  P. Hedrick,et al.  Understanding Inbreeding Depression, Purging, and Genetic Rescue. , 2016, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[6]  C. Richards,et al.  Three types of rescue can avert extinction in a changing environment , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[7]  Curry J. Cunningham,et al.  Evolutionary rescue in a changing world. , 2014, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[8]  D. Bates,et al.  Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4 , 2014, 1406.5823.

[9]  G. Bell Evolutionary rescue and the limits of adaptation , 2013, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[10]  M. Hochberg,et al.  Evolutionary rescue: an emerging focus at the intersection between ecology and evolution , 2013, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[11]  M. Wade,et al.  An unusual barrier to gene flow: perpetually immature larvae from inter‐population crosses in the flour beetle, Tribolium castaneum , 2011, Journal of Evolutionary Biology.

[12]  Alyson J. Lumley,et al.  Inbreeding Promotes Female Promiscuity , 2011, Science.

[13]  D. Bolnick,et al.  EFFECTS OF FOUNDING GENETIC VARIATION ON ADAPTATION TO A NOVEL RESOURCE , 2011, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[14]  A. Biere,et al.  Population admixture, biological invasions and the balance between local adaptation and inbreeding depression , 2011, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[15]  D. H. Reed,et al.  INBREEDING DEPRESSION INCREASES WITH ENVIRONMENTAL STRESS: AN EXPERIMENTAL STUDY AND META‐ANALYSIS , 2011, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[16]  K. Whitney,et al.  Population genetic diversity influences colonization success , 2010, Molecular ecology.

[17]  J. Hutchings,et al.  Evolutionary ecology at the extremes of species' ranges. , 2010 .

[18]  Brett A. Melbourne,et al.  Extinction risk depends strongly on factors contributing to stochasticity , 2008, Nature.

[19]  W. Bradshaw,et al.  Genetic response to rapid climate change: it's seasonal timing that matters , 2008, Molecular ecology.

[20]  G. Yan,et al.  Variation in polyandry and its fitness consequences among populations of the red flour beetle, Tribolium castaneum , 2007, Evolutionary Ecology.

[21]  K. Schierenbeck,et al.  Hybridization as a stimulus for the evolution of invasiveness in plants? , 2006, Euphytica.

[22]  C. Fricke,et al.  The effects of male and female genotype on variance in male fertilization success in the red flour beetle (Tribolium castaneum) , 2003, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[23]  G. Yan,et al.  Female mate choice in relation to heterozygosity in Tribolium castaneum , 2002 .

[24]  Thomas Lenormand,et al.  Gene flow and the limits to natural selection , 2002 .

[25]  K. Schierenbeck,et al.  Hybridization as a stimulus for the evolution of invasiveness in plants , 2000 .

[26]  M. Wade Variance-effective population number: the effects of sex ratio and density on the mean and variance of offspring numbers in the flour beetle, Tribolium castaneum. , 1984, Genetical research.

[27]  D. Tallmon,et al.  Genetic rescue to the rescue. , 2015, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[28]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[29]  W. Bradshaw,et al.  Light, time, and the physiology of biotic response to rapid climate change in animals. , 2010, Annual review of physiology.

[30]  D. Schluter,et al.  Adaptation from standing genetic variation. , 2008, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[31]  R. Beeman,et al.  A Hybrid Incompatibility Factor in Tribolium castaneum , 1995 .