How much is enough? Landscape-scale conservation for the Florida panther

Abstract The Florida panther (Puma concolor coryi) is an endangered, wide-ranging predator whose habitat needs conflict with a rapidly growing human population. Our goal was to identify specific regions of the south Florida landscape that are of high conservation value to support a self-sustaining panther population. We used compositional and Euclidean distance analyses to determine relative importance of various land cover types as panther habitat and to investigate the role of forest patch size in habitat selection. A model of landscape components important to Florida panther habitat conservation was created. The model was used in combination with radio telemetry records, home range overlaps, land use/land cover data, and satellite imagery to delineate Primary and Secondary zones that would comprise a landscape mosaic of cover types sufficient to support a self-sustaining population. The Primary Zone generally supports the present population and is of highest conservation value, while the Secondary Zone is of lesser value but could accommodate expansion of the population given sufficient habitat restoration. Least-cost path models identified important landscape linkages, and model results were used to delineate a Dispersal Zone to accommodate future panther dispersal outside of south Florida. We determined that the three habitat zones could support 80–94 panthers, a population likely to persist and remain stable for 100 years, but that would be subject to continued genetic problems. The Primary, Dispersal and Secondary zones comprise essential components of a landscape-scale conservation plan for the protection of a viable Florida panther population in south Florida. Assessments of potential impacts of developments should strive to achieve no net loss of landscape function or carrying capacity for panthers within the Primary Zone or throughout the present range of the Florida panther.

[1]  M. McCarthy,et al.  Species conservation and management : case studies , 2004 .

[2]  T. Hoctor,et al.  Florida panther dispersal and conservation , 2002 .

[3]  LEONARD A. BRENNAN,et al.  COMPARISON OF TYPE I ERROR RATES FOR STATISTICAL ANALYSES OF RESOURCE SELECTION , 2004 .

[4]  P. Beier Dispersal of juvenile cougars in fragmented habitat , 1995 .

[5]  Evaluating Scientific Inferences about the Florida Panther , 2006 .

[6]  Richard J. Hobbs,et al.  Nature Conservation 2: The Role of Corridors , 1993 .

[7]  E. J. Comiskey,et al.  Panthers and Forests in South Florida: an Ecological Perspective , 2002 .

[8]  James R. Anderson,et al.  A land use and land cover classification system for use with remote sensor data , 1976 .

[9]  Joshua J. Millspaugh,et al.  Effects of sample size on kernel home range estimates , 1999 .

[10]  L. Conner,et al.  Using Euclidean Distances to Assess Nonrandom Habitat Use , 2001 .

[11]  Joseph D. Clark,et al.  Florida Panther Habitat Use in Response to Prescribed Fire , 2001 .

[12]  R. Powell,et al.  KERNELHR: A program for estimating animal home ranges , 1998 .

[13]  E. J. Milner-Gulland,et al.  Species Conservation and Management: Case Studies , 2004 .

[14]  E. E. Hardy,et al.  A Land Use and Land Cover Classification System for Use with Remote Sensor Data GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 964 , 2006 .

[15]  P. Pritchard,et al.  Rare and endangered biota of Florida , 1978 .

[16]  Jonathan P. Deason,et al.  Wide-ranging carnivores and development permits: constructing a multi-scale model to evaluate impacts on the Florida panther , 2002 .

[17]  Robert C. Belden,et al.  Panther Habitat Use in Southern Florida , 1988 .

[18]  Contract Panther,et al.  Current Panther Distribution, Population Trends, and Habitat Use Report of Field Work: Fall 2000 - Winter 2001 , 2001 .

[19]  Paul Beier,et al.  Population viability analysis. , 2016 .

[20]  B. Worton Kernel methods for estimating the utilization distribution in home-range studies , 1989 .

[21]  Joshua J. Millspaugh,et al.  Radio Tracking and Animal Populations , 2001 .

[22]  D. Maehr,et al.  Landscape Features and Panthers in Florida. , 1995, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[23]  Kimberly G. Smith,et al.  Metapopulations and wildlife conservation , 1997 .

[24]  Randy Kautz,et al.  Strategic Habitats for Biodiversity Conservation in Florida , 2001 .

[25]  Nicholas J. Aebischer,et al.  Compositional Analysis of Habitat Use From Animal Radio-Tracking Data , 1993 .

[26]  R. L. Harrison Toward a Theory of Inter-Refuge Corridor Design , 1992 .

[27]  A. Kerkhoff,et al.  Toward a panther-centered view of the forests of South Florida. , 2000 .

[28]  R. Lande,et al.  Population viability analysis , 2003 .