Analysing the Structural Properties of Learning Networks

A good repertoire of methods for analysing and sharing ideas about existing designs can make a useful contribution to improving the quality and efficiency of educational design work. Just as architects can improve their practice by studying historic and contemporary buildings, so people who design to help people learn can get better at what they do by understanding the designs of others.

[1]  David Kirsh,et al.  Embodied cognition and the magical future of interaction design , 2013, TCHI.

[2]  Peter Goodyear,et al.  IT-based open learning: tasks & tools , 1992 .

[3]  Christopher Alexander.  The Nature of Order , 2005 .

[4]  R. Mason,et al.  Mindweave : communication, computers and distance education , 1989 .

[5]  M. Schrage.  Shared Minds: The New Technologies of Collaboration , 1990 .

[6]  Steve Olson.  From Neurons to Neighborhoods: An Update--Workshop Summary. , 2012 .

[7]  Kate Thompson,et al.  Combining collaboration spaces: identifying patterns of tool use for decision-making in a networked learning environment , 2012 .

[8]  Peter Goodyear.  Online learning and teaching in the arts and humanities : reflecting on purposes and design. , 2002 .

[9]  P. Goodyear,et al.  IT-Based Open Learning: Tasks and Tools , 1992 .

[10]  S. Borgatti,et al.  The Network Paradigm in Organizational Research: A Review and Typology , 2003 .

[11]  Christopher Alexander.  The Origins of Pattern Theory: The Future of the Theory, and the Generation of a Living World , 1999, IEEE Softw..

[12]  Yvonne Rogers,et al.  Introduction to the special issue on the theory and practice of embodied interaction in HCI and interaction design , 2013, TCHI.

[13]  Anthony Kaye,et al.  Collaborative Learning Through Computer Conferencing: The Najaden Papers , 2012 .

[14]  Carl Knappett,et al.  Network analysis in archaeology : new approaches to regional interaction , 2013 .

[15]  E. Wenger,et al.  Promoting and assessing value creation in communities and networks: a conceptual framework , 2011 .

[16]  James A. Levin,et al.  Building electronic communities: success and failure in computer networking , 1990 .

[17]  Christopher Alexander,et al.  A City is Not a Tree , 2015 .

[18]  M. Castells.  The rise of the network society , 1996 .

[19]  Christopher Alexander,et al.  The Timeless Way of Building , 1979 .

[20]  Chris Jones,et al.  Networked Learning: Perspectives and Issues , 2001 .

[21]  Craig Zimring,et al.  Linking Objective Measures Of Space To Cognition And Action , 2003 .

[22]  Peter Goodyear,et al.  Educational design and networked learning: Patterns, pattern languages and design practice , 2005 .

[23]  Fatos Xhafa,et al.  A Review on Massive E-Learning (MOOC) Design, Delivery and Assessment , 2013, 2013 Eighth International Conference on P2P, Parallel, Grid, Cloud and Internet Computing.

[24]  Chris Jones,et al.  Networks and learning : communities, practices and the metaphor of networks. , 2004 .

[25]  Paris Avgeriou,et al.  Towards a Pattern Language for Networked Learning , 2004 .

[26]  P. Haggett.  Network Analysis In Geography , 1971 .

[27]  Karen Page,et al.  Network Forms of Organization , 1998 .

[28]  Marc Clarà,et al.  Learning online: massive open online courses (MOOCs), connectivism, and cultural psychology , 2013 .

[29]  Roy Williams,et al.  The Ideals and Reality of Participating in a MOOC , 2010, Proceedings of the International Conference on Networked Learning.

[30]  Mayor Susan,et al.  Changing practice , 2004 .

[31]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  Linked: The New Science of Networks , 2002 .

[32]  Peter Baumgartner,et al.  The potential of Christopher Alexander's theory and practice of wholeness: clues for developing an educational taxonomy , 2010, EuroPLoP.

[33]  Vivien Hodgson,et al.  Research on networked learning: An overview , 2004 .

[34]  Peter Goodyear,et al.  In medias res: reframing design for learning , 2013 .

[35]  Peter Goodyear,et al.  The Architecture of Productive Learning Networks , 2014 .

[36]  Judy Kay,et al.  MOOCs: So Many Learners, So Much Potential ... , 2013, IEEE Intelligent Systems.

[37]  J. Gee.  Semiotic Social Spaces and Affinity Spaces From The Age of Mythology to Today's Schools , 2005 .

[38]  John Law,et al.  Networks, relations, cyborgs: on the social study of technology , 2006 .

[39]  Vic Lally,et al.  Online teaching in networked learning communities: A multi-method approach to studying the role of the teacher , 2007 .

[40]  William J. Mitchell,et al.  Me++: The Cyborg Self and the Networked City , 2003 .

[41]  Perver K. Baran,et al.  Does Intelligibility Affect Place Legibility? Understanding the Relationship Between Objective and Subjective Evaluations of the Urban Environment , 2012 .

[42]  Mark S. Granovetter.  T H E S T R E N G T H O F WEAK TIES: A NETWORK THEORY REVISITED , 1983 .

[43]  Max Jacobson,et al.  A Pattern Language: Towns, Buildings, Construction , 1981 .

[44]  Jos Boys,et al.  Towards Creative Learning Spaces: Re-thinking the Architecture of Post-Compulsory Education , 2010 .

[45]  Guillaume Zufferey,et al.  MOOC Learning in Spontaneous Study Groups: Does Synchronously Watching Videos Make a Difference? , 2014 .

[46]  Bill Hillier,et al.  Space is the machine: A configurational theory of architecture , 1996 .

[47]  A. Kellerman,et al.  The Constitution of Society : Outline of the Theory of Structuration , 2015 .

[48]  Vivien Hodgson,et al.  Advances in Research on Networked Learning , 2011 .