Functional modular architecture underlying attentional control in aging

ABSTRACT Previous research suggests that age‐related differences in attention reflect the interaction of top‐down and bottom‐up processes, but the cognitive and neural mechanisms underlying this interaction remain an active area of research. Here, within a sample of community‐dwelling adults 19–78 years of age, we used diffusion reaction time (RT) modeling and multivariate functional connectivity to investigate the behavioral components and whole‐brain functional networks, respectively, underlying bottom‐up and top‐down attentional processes during conjunction visual search. During functional MRI scanning, participants completed a conjunction visual search task in which each display contained one item that was larger than the other items (i.e., a size singleton) but was not informative regarding target identity. This design allowed us to examine in the RT components and functional network measures the influence of (a) additional bottom‐up guidance when the target served as the size singleton, relative to when the distractor served as the size singleton (i.e., size singleton effect) and (b) top‐down processes during target detection (i.e., target detection effect; target present vs. absent trials). We found that the size singleton effect (i.e., increased bottom‐up guidance) was associated with RT components related to decision and nondecision processes, but these effects did not vary with age. Also, a modularity analysis revealed that frontoparietal module connectivity was important for both the size singleton and target detection effects, but this module became central to the networks through different mechanisms for each effect. Lastly, participants 42 years of age and older, in service of the target detection effect, relied more on between‐frontoparietal module connections. Our results further elucidate mechanisms through which frontoparietal regions support attentional control and how these mechanisms vary in relation to adult age. HIGHLIGHTSBottom‐up processes are important for conjunction visual search.Bottom‐up guidance influences both decision and nondecision behavioral processes.Bottom‐up guidance influences frontoparietal and subcortical connectivity.Nondecision processes influence top‐down, frontoparietal connectivity.Adults 42 years and older utilize different top‐down, frontoparietal mechanisms.

[1]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  A diffusion model analysis of the effects of aging in the lexical-decision task. , 2004, Psychology and aging.

[2]  Stephen M. Smith,et al.  A global optimisation method for robust affine registration of brain images , 2001, Medical Image Anal..

[3]  A. Voss,et al.  Diffusion models in experimental psychology: a practical introduction. , 2013, Experimental psychology.

[4]  Marina Vannucci,et al.  Time-dependence of graph theory metrics in functional connectivity analysis , 2016, NeuroImage.

[5]  Mary E. Meyerand,et al.  Age-Related Reorganizational Changes in Modularity and Functional Connectivity of Human Brain Networks , 2014, Brain Connect..

[6]  DeLiang Wang,et al.  The role of priming in conjunctive visual search , 2002, Cognition.

[7]  Mark D'Esposito,et al.  Reconfiguration of brain network architecture to support executive control in aging , 2016, Neurobiology of Aging.

[8]  O. Sporns,et al.  Network hubs in the human brain , 2013, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[9]  Nicholas A. Steinmetz,et al.  Top-down control of visual attention , 2010, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[10]  Keiichi Onoda,et al.  Small-worldness and modularity of the resting-state functional brain network decrease with aging , 2013, Neuroscience Letters.

[11]  Roger Guimerà,et al.  Cartography of complex networks: modules and universal roles , 2005, Journal of statistical mechanics.

[12]  O. Sporns,et al.  From regions to connections and networks: new bridges between brain and behavior , 2016, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[13]  David J. Madden,et al.  Searching from the Top Down: Ageing and Attentional Guidance during Singleton Detection , 2005, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[14]  Eric-Jan Wagenmakers,et al.  An EZ-diffusion model for response time and accuracy , 2007, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[15]  S. Treue Visual attention: the where, what, how and why of saliency , 2003, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[16]  Arne D. Ekstrom,et al.  Multiple interacting brain areas underlie successful spatiotemporal memory retrieval in humans , 2014, Scientific Reports.

[17]  Denise C. Park,et al.  Decreased segregation of brain systems across the healthy adult lifespan , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[18]  Kimberly J. Schlesinger,et al.  Age-dependent changes in task-based modular organization of the human brain , 2017, NeuroImage.

[19]  Thomas V. Wiecki,et al.  The Quality of Response Time Data Inference: A Blinded, Collaborative Assessment of the Validity of Cognitive Models , 2018, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.

[20]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Conjunctive search for one and two identical targets. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[21]  Benjamin R. Geib,et al.  From hippocampus to whole‐brain: The role of integrative processing in episodic memory retrieval , 2017, Human brain mapping.

[22]  Daniel J Bauer,et al.  Probing Interactions in Fixed and Multilevel Regression: Inferential and Graphical Techniques , 2005, Multivariate behavioral research.

[23]  Roberto Cabeza,et al.  Cerebral White Matter Integrity Mediates Adult Age Differences in Cognitive Performance , 2009, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[24]  Michael Brady,et al.  Improved Optimization for the Robust and Accurate Linear Registration and Motion Correction of Brain Images , 2002, NeuroImage.

[25]  Mark W. Woolrich,et al.  Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL , 2004, NeuroImage.

[26]  Richard F. Betzel,et al.  Modular Brain Networks. , 2016, Annual review of psychology.

[27]  M. Proulx Bottom-up guidance in visual search for conjunctions. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[28]  R. N. Spreng,et al.  Reliable differences in brain activity between young and old adults: A quantitative meta-analysis across multiple cognitive domains , 2010, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[29]  Jong H. Yoon,et al.  General and Specific Functional Connectivity Disturbances in First-Episode Schizophrenia During Cognitive Control Performance , 2011, Biological Psychiatry.

[30]  Jessica R. Cohen,et al.  The Segregation and Integration of Distinct Brain Networks and Their Relationship to Cognition , 2016, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[31]  Sebastiano Vigna,et al.  PageRank: Functional dependencies , 2009, TOIS.

[32]  Adam Gazzaley,et al.  Measuring functional connectivity during distinct stages of a cognitive task , 2004, NeuroImage.

[33]  Palmer O. Johnson,et al.  The Johnson-Neyman technique, its theory and application , 1950, Psychometrika.

[34]  Bruce Fischl,et al.  Accurate and robust brain image alignment using boundary-based registration , 2009, NeuroImage.

[35]  Andreas Voss,et al.  A diffusion model analysis of adult age differences in episodic and semantic long-term memory retrieval. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[36]  U. Neisser VISUAL SEARCH. , 1964, Scientific American.

[37]  Scott D. Brown,et al.  Diffusion Decision Model: Current Issues and History , 2016, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[38]  Zachary A. Monge,et al.  Individual differences in reasoning and visuospatial attention are associated with prefrontal and parietal white matter tracts in healthy older adults. , 2016, Neuropsychology.

[39]  Paul J. Laurienti,et al.  The Brain as a Complex System: Using Network Science as a Tool for Understanding the Brain , 2011, Brain Connect..

[40]  Cedric E. Ginestet,et al.  Cognitive relevance of the community structure of the human brain functional coactivation network , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[41]  Julia Spaniol,et al.  Adult age differences in the implicit and explicit components of top-down attentional guidance during visual search. , 2005, Psychology and aging.

[42]  A. Beck The Beck Depression Inventory , 1978 .

[43]  Lisa T. Eyler,et al.  A Review of Functional Brain Imaging Correlates of Successful Cognitive Aging , 2011, Biological Psychiatry.

[44]  B. Schneider,et al.  Implications of perceptual deterioration for cognitive aging research. , 2000 .

[45]  Daniel L. Schacter,et al.  Ageing and the resting state: is cognition obsolete? , 2017, Language, cognition and neuroscience.

[46]  W. Klunk,et al.  Imaging brain amyloid in Alzheimer's disease with Pittsburgh Compound‐B , 2004, Annals of neurology.

[47]  S. Yantis,et al.  Spatially selective representations of voluntary and stimulus-driven attentional priority in human occipital, parietal, and frontal cortex. , 2007, Cerebral cortex.

[48]  Earl K Miller,et al.  Cortical circuits for the control of attention , 2012, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[49]  Yong He,et al.  Topological organization of the human brain functional connectome across the lifespan , 2013, Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience.

[50]  N. Tzourio-Mazoyer,et al.  Automated Anatomical Labeling of Activations in SPM Using a Macroscopic Anatomical Parcellation of the MNI MRI Single-Subject Brain , 2002, NeuroImage.

[51]  Harriet A. Allen,et al.  Similar behaviour, different brain patterns: Age-related changes in neural signatures of ignoring , 2012, NeuroImage.

[52]  Joshua D. Cosman,et al.  The Control of Visual Attention , 2014 .

[53]  Desmond J. Higham,et al.  GeneRank: Using search engine technology for the analysis of microarray experiments , 2005, BMC Bioinformatics.

[54]  Miguel P Eckstein,et al.  Visual search: a retrospective. , 2011, Journal of vision.

[55]  Abimbola Farinde,et al.  The Beck Depression Inventory , 2013 .

[56]  Danielle S Bassett,et al.  Genetic Influences on Cost-Efficient Organization of Human Cortical Functional Networks , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[57]  Marie T Banich,et al.  Functional connectivity at rest is sensitive to individual differences in executive function: A network analysis , 2016, Human brain mapping.

[58]  Roger Ratcliff,et al.  The Diffusion Decision Model: Theory and Data for Two-Choice Decision Tasks , 2008, Neural Computation.

[59]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  A diffusion model analysis of the effects of aging on letter discrimination. , 2003, Psychology and aging.

[60]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  The effects of aging on reaction time in a signal detection task. , 2001, Psychology and aging.

[61]  E. Wagenmakers,et al.  EZ does it! Extensions of the EZ-diffusion model , 2008, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[62]  J. Theeuwes Top-down and bottom-up control of visual selection. , 2010, Acta psychologica.

[63]  Joaquín Goñi,et al.  Changes in structural and functional connectivity among resting-state networks across the human lifespan , 2014, NeuroImage.

[64]  Klaus Oberauer,et al.  How to use the diffusion model: Parameter recovery of three methods: EZ, fast-dm, and DMAT , 2009 .

[65]  Andrew R. Bender,et al.  Age related differences in reaction time components and diffusion properties of normal-appearing white matter in healthy adults , 2015, Neuropsychologia.

[66]  C. Grady,et al.  Age differences in the functional interactions among the default, frontoparietal control, and dorsal attention networks , 2016, Neurobiology of Aging.

[67]  R. Ptak The Frontoparietal Attention Network of the Human Brain , 2012, The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry.

[68]  David J. Madden,et al.  Age-related changes in visual attention , 2003 .

[69]  Erik A. Wing,et al.  Hippocampal Contributions to the Large‐Scale Episodic Memory Network Predict Vivid Visual Memories , 2017, Cerebral cortex.

[70]  H. Egeth,et al.  Goal-directed guidance of attention: evidence from conjunctive visual search. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[71]  Katherine A. Johnson,et al.  Sustained attention, attentional selectivity, and attentional capacity across the lifespan , 2012, Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics.

[72]  Y. Benjamini,et al.  Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing , 1995 .

[73]  Jonathan D. Power,et al.  Evidence for Hubs in Human Functional Brain Networks , 2013, Neuron.

[74]  Stephen M Smith,et al.  Fast robust automated brain extraction , 2002, Human brain mapping.

[75]  Keith Bush,et al.  A comparison of statistical methods for detecting context-modulated functional connectivity in fMRI , 2014, NeuroImage.

[76]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Conjunctive search for one and two identical targets. , 1989 .

[77]  S. Yantis,et al.  Visual Attention: Bottom-Up Versus Top-Down , 2004, Current Biology.

[78]  A. Treisman Features and Objects: The Fourteenth Bartlett Memorial Lecture , 1988, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[79]  Morris Moscovitch,et al.  Resting-state networks do not determine cognitive function networks: a commentary on Campbell and Schacter (2016) , 2017, Language, cognition and neuroscience.

[80]  David J. Madden,et al.  Linking cognitive and visual perceptual decline in healthy aging: The information degradation hypothesis , 2016, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[81]  Ikuko Mukai,et al.  A role of right middle frontal gyrus in reorienting of attention: a case study , 2015, Front. Syst. Neurosci..

[82]  L. Brown,et al.  Sensory and cognitive functions of the basal ganglia , 1997, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[83]  S. Shipp The brain circuitry of attention , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[84]  Steven Yantis,et al.  How visual salience wins the battle for awareness , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[85]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  A diffusion model analysis of the effects of aging on brightness discrimination , 2003, Perception & psychophysics.

[86]  P. Baltes,et al.  Emergence of a powerful connection between sensory and cognitive functions across the adult life span: a new window to the study of cognitive aging? , 1997, Psychology and aging.

[87]  R. Ratcliff Group reaction time distributions and an analysis of distribution statistics. , 1979, Psychological bulletin.

[88]  N. P. Bichot,et al.  Frontal eye field activity before visual search errors reveals the integration of bottom-up and top-down salience. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[89]  A. Voss,et al.  Diffusion Models in Experimental Psychology , 2013 .

[90]  Gereon R. Fink,et al.  Dorsal and Ventral Attention Systems , 2014, The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry.

[91]  T. Salthouse Aging and measures of processing speed , 2000, Biological Psychology.

[92]  B. C. Motter,et al.  The guidance of eye movements during active visual search , 1998, Vision Research.

[93]  Roberto Cabeza,et al.  Age-related preservation of top-down attentional guidance during visual search. , 2004, Psychology and aging.

[94]  G. Fink,et al.  Dorsal and Ventral Attention Systems : Distinct Neural Circuits but Collaborative Roles , 2013 .

[95]  G. Campana,et al.  Where perception meets memory: A review of repetition priming in visual search tasks , 2010, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[96]  Zachary A. Monge,et al.  Task difficulty modulates brain activation in the emotional oddball task , 2017, Brain Research.

[97]  M. Tinker Dvorine pseudo-isochromatic plates. (Rev. Ed.). , 1955 .

[98]  A. Hayes Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach , 2013 .

[99]  Jan Theeuwes,et al.  SEARCH FOR A CONJUNCTIVELY DEFINED TARGET CAN BE SELECTIVELY LIMITED TO A COLOR-DEFINED SUBSET OF ELEMENTS , 1995 .

[100]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain , 2002, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[101]  M. Bach The Freiburg Visual Acuity test--automatic measurement of visual acuity. , 1996, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[102]  U. Brandes,et al.  Maximizing Modularity is hard , 2006, physics/0608255.

[103]  J. S. Schneider,et al.  A consideration of sensory factors involved in motor functions of the basal ganglia , 1985, Brain Research Reviews.

[104]  Justin L. Vincent,et al.  Spontaneous neuronal activity distinguishes human dorsal and ventral attention systems. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[105]  S. Folstein,et al.  "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. , 1975, Journal of psychiatric research.

[106]  Yong He,et al.  BrainNet Viewer: A Network Visualization Tool for Human Brain Connectomics , 2013, PloS one.

[107]  N. P. Bichot,et al.  Saccade target selection in macaque during feature and conjunction visual search , 1999, Visual Neuroscience.

[108]  Michele T. Diaz,et al.  Frontoparietal activation during visual conjunction search: Effects of bottom‐up guidance and adult age , 2017, Human brain mapping.

[109]  Xintao Hu,et al.  Test-retest reliability of functional connectivity networks during naturalistic fMRI paradigms , 2016, bioRxiv.

[110]  A. Babajani-Feremi,et al.  Application of advanced machine learning methods on resting-state fMRI network for identification of mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease , 2015, Brain Imaging and Behavior.

[111]  B. Hommel,et al.  Visual search across the life span. , 2004, Developmental psychology.

[112]  Jean-Loup Guillaume,et al.  Local leaders in random networks. , 2007, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[113]  Yong He,et al.  Individual differences and time-varying features of modular brain architecture , 2017, NeuroImage.

[114]  Andrew Trotman,et al.  Sound and complete relevance assessment for XML retrieval , 2008, TOIS.

[115]  O. Sporns,et al.  Network centrality in the human functional connectome. , 2012, Cerebral cortex.

[116]  Olaf Sporns,et al.  Complex network measures of brain connectivity: Uses and interpretations , 2010, NeuroImage.

[117]  O. Sporns,et al.  Complex brain networks: graph theoretical analysis of structural and functional systems , 2009, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[118]  R. Ratcliff Modeling aging effects on two-choice tasks: response signal and response time data. , 2008, Psychology and aging.

[119]  Scott A. Huettel,et al.  Age-Related Changes in NeuralActivity During Visual Perception and Attention , 2004 .

[120]  Eirini Mavritsaki,et al.  The neural mechanisms of visual selection: the view from neuropsychology , 2010, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[121]  Jim M. Monti,et al.  Neural Integration of Top-Down Spatial and Feature-Based Information in Visual Search , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[122]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  Aging and individual differences in rapid two-choice decisions , 2006, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[123]  Clayton E Curtis,et al.  Prioritized Maps of Space in Human Frontoparietal Cortex , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[124]  J. Theeuwes,et al.  Top-down versus bottom-up attentional control: a failed theoretical dichotomy , 2012, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.