A Randomized Field Trial of the Fast ForWord Language Computer-Based Training Program

This article describes an independent assessment of the Fast ForWord Language computer-based training program developed by Scientific Learning Corporation. Previous laboratory research involving children with language-based learning impairments showed strong effects on their abilities to recognize brief and fast sequences of nonspeech and speech stimuli, but generalization of these effects beyond clinical settings and student populations and to broader literacy measures remains unclear. Implementing a randomized field trial in eight urban schools, we generated impact estimates from separate intent-to-treat and treatment-on-the-treated analyses of the literacy outcomes of second- and seventh-grade students who were more generally at risk for poor reading and language outcomes. There were some problems of implementation in the field setting, and the Fast ForWord Language program did not, in general, help students in these eight schools improve their language and reading comprehension test scores.

[1]  Steven L. Miller,et al.  Language Comprehension in Language-Learning Impaired Children Improved with Acoustically Modified Speech , 1996, Science.

[2]  M. Reed.  Speech perception and the discrimination of brief auditory cues in reading disabled children. , 1989, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[3]  Nicole A. Lazar,et al.  Statistical Analysis With Missing Data , 2003, Technometrics.

[4]  L. Ehri,et al.  Movement into Reading: Is the First Stage of Printed Word Learning Visual or Phonetic?. , 1985 .

[5]  Harold H. Wenglinsky.  Does It Compute? The Relationship between Educational Technology and Student Achievement in Mathematics. , 1998 .

[6]  Harold Wenglinsky.  Does it compute , 1998 .

[7]  R. Calfee,et al.  Acoustic-phonetic skills and reading--kindergarten through twelfth grade. , 1973, Journal of educational psychology.

[8]  Eric Jensen,et al.  A Fresh Look at Brain-Based Education , 2008 .

[9]  Jay R. Campbell,et al.  The Nation's Report Card: Reading, 2002. , 2003 .

[10]  S Begley,et al.  Rewiring your gray matter. The brain: you can teach an old brain new tricks. Neuroplasticity promises to give a whole new meaning to 'changing your mind'. , 2000, Newsweek.

[11]  Joshua D. Angrist,et al.  Identification of Causal Effects Using Instrumental Variables , 1993 .

[12]  Franghiz Ali-Zadeh,et al.  In search of , 2005 .

[13]  A Cornwall,et al.  The Relationship Between Phonological Awareness and Reading and Spelling Achievement Eleven Years Later , 1995, Journal of learning disabilities.

[14]  Charles A. Perfetti,et al.  Phonemic knowledge and learning to read are reciprocal: A longitudinal study of first grade children. , 1987 .

[15]  Geoffrey D. Borman.  Experiments for Educational Evaluation and Improvement , 2002, Peabody Journal of Education.

[16]  Lee J. Cronbach,et al.  Toward Reform of Program Evaluation: Aims, Methods, and Institutional Arrangements. , 1982 .

[17]  Steven L. Miller,et al.  Neural deficits in children with dyslexia ameliorated by behavioral remediation: Evidence from functional MRI , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[18]  Ronald B Gillam,et al.  Computer-Assisted Language Intervention Using Fast ForWord®: Theoretical and Empirical Considerations for Clinical Decision-Making. , 1999, Language, speech, and hearing services in schools.

[19]  P. Tallal.  Auditory temporal perception, phonics, and reading disabilities in children , 1980, Brain and Language.

[20]  James J. Heckman,et al.  Identification of Causal Effects Using Instrumental Variables: Comment , 1996 .

[21]  Howard S. Bloom,et al.  Constructing Instrumental Variables from Experimental Data to Explore How Treatments Produce Effects. , 2005 .

[22]  S. Crain,et al.  Cognitive Profiles of Reading-Disabled Children: Comparison of Language Skills in Phonology, Morphology, and Syntax , 1995 .

[23]  R. Cook.  Detection of influential observation in linear regression , 2000 .

[24]  Linnea C. Ehri,et al.  The influence of orthography on readers' conceptualization of the phonemic structure of words , 1980, Applied Psycholinguistics.

[25]  Marilyn Jager Adams,et al.  Beginning To Read: Thinking and Learning about Print. , 1991 .

[26]  D. Rubin.  INFERENCE AND MISSING DATA , 1975 .

[27]  J. Angrist,et al.  New Evidence on Classroom Computers and Pupil Learning , 1999, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[28]  John T. Bruer,et al.  In Search of . . . Brain-Based Education , 1999 .

[29]  R. Wagner,et al.  The nature of phonological processing and its causal role in the acquisition of reading skills. , 1987 .

[30]  Robert E. Slavin,et al.  IBM's Writing to Read: Is It Right for Reading?. , 1990 .

[31]  Naseem Choudhury,et al.  The importance of rapid auditory processing abilities to early language development: evidence from converging methodologies. , 2002, Developmental psychobiology.

[32]  Steven L. Miller,et al.  Temporal Processing Deficits of Language-Learning Impaired Children Ameliorated by Training , 1996, Science.

[33]  Yong Zhao,et al.  Technology uses and student achievement: A longitudinal study , 2007, Comput. Educ..

[34]  Larry Cuban,et al.  Computers Make Kids Smarter—Right? , 1998 .

[35]  Alan B. Krueger,et al.  Putting Computerized Instruction to the Test: A Randomized Evaluation of a "Scientifically-Based" Reading Program , 2004 .

[36]  A. Hossain,et al.  A comparative study on detection of influential observations in linear regression , 1991 .

[37]  H. White.  A Heteroskedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for Heteroskedasticity , 1980 .

[38]  William R. Penuel,et al.  Effectiveness of Reading and Mathematics Software Products: Findings from the First Student Cohort , 2007 .

[39]  P. Tallal,et al.  Neural mechanisms of language-based learning impairments: insights from human populations and animal models. , 2003, Behavioral and cognitive neuroscience reviews.