Frameworks to Encode User Preferences for Inferring Topic-sensitive Information Networks

The connection between online users is the key to the success of many important applications, such as viral marketing. In reality, we often easily observe the time when each user in the network receives a message, yet the users’ connections that empower the message diffusion remain hidden. Therefore, given the traces of disseminated messages, recent research has extensively studied approaches to uncover the underlying diffusion network. Since topic related information could assist the network inference, previous methods incorporated either users’ preferences over topics or the topic distributions of cascading messages. However, methods combining both of them may lead to more accurate results, because they consider a more comprehensive range of available information. In this paper, we investigate this possibility by exploring two principled methods: Weighted Topic Cascade (WTC) and Preference-enhanced Topic Cascade (PTC). WTC and PTC formulate the network inference task as non-smooth convex optimization problems and adopt coordinate proximal gradient descent to solve them. Based on synthetic and real datasets, substantial experiments demonstrate that although WTC is better than several previous approaches in most cases, it is less stable than PTC, which constantly outperforms other baselines with an improvement of 4%∼10% in terms of the F-measure of inferred networks.

[1]  Stefano Ermon,et al.  Feature-Enhanced Probabilistic Models for Diffusion Network Inference , 2012, ECML/PKDD.

[2]  P. Tseng Convergence of a Block Coordinate Descent Method for Nondifferentiable Minimization , 2001 .

[3]  Michael I. Jordan,et al.  Latent Dirichlet Allocation , 2001, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[4]  Gregor Heinrich Parameter estimation for text analysis , 2009 .

[5]  P. Erdos,et al.  On the evolution of random graphs , 1984 .

[6]  Bernhard Schölkopf,et al.  Uncovering the Temporal Dynamics of Diffusion Networks , 2011, ICML.

[7]  Jure Leskovec,et al.  Inferring networks of diffusion and influence , 2010, KDD.

[8]  Juan-Zi Li,et al.  Social Influence Locality for Modeling Retweeting Behaviors , 2013, IJCAI.

[9]  Jure Leskovec,et al.  Meme-tracking and the dynamics of the news cycle , 2009, KDD.

[10]  B. Bollobás The evolution of random graphs , 1984 .

[11]  Christos Faloutsos,et al.  Kronecker Graphs: An Approach to Modeling Networks , 2008, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[12]  Zhoujun Li,et al.  Diabetes-Associated Factors as Predictors of Nursing Home Admission and Costs in the Elderly Across Europe. , 2017, Journal of the American Medical Directors Association.

[13]  Nello Cristianini,et al.  Refining causality: who copied from whom? , 2011, KDD.

[14]  Bernhard Schölkopf,et al.  Structure and dynamics of information pathways in online media , 2012, WSDM.

[15]  Éva Tardos,et al.  Maximizing the Spread of Influence through a Social Network , 2015, Theory Comput..

[16]  Sujay Sanghavi,et al.  Learning the graph of epidemic cascades , 2012, SIGMETRICS '12.

[17]  M. Newman,et al.  Hierarchical structure and the prediction of missing links in networks , 2008, Nature.

[18]  Stephen P. Boyd,et al.  Proximal Algorithms , 2013, Found. Trends Optim..

[19]  Bernhard Scholkopf,et al.  Submodular Inference of Diffusion Networks from Multiple Trees , 2012, ICML.

[20]  Le Song,et al.  Uncover Topic-Sensitive Information Diffusion Networks , 2013, AISTATS.

[21]  Alessandro Panconesi,et al.  Trace complexity of network inference , 2013, KDD.