The simulation of particle flow mechanisms in dustiness testers

Dust generation is a common result of many bulk handling and mining applications and has potentially serious consequences to the surrounding environment as well as workers and nearby community. Companies need to know how much and what type of dust is being generated so they can find ways to reduce this dust. Dustiness testers can be used for this purpose. This paper investigates the rotating drum testers used for dustiness testing of bulk solids and the subsequent discrete element method (DEM) simulation of the particle mechanisms. Preliminary comparisons of the rotating drum designs were undertaken using particle/bulk parameters of a granular “non-dusty” material (polyethylene pellets) to investigate the flow mechanisms to ensure accuracy before pursuing the complexity of simulating small dusty materials. These initial trials involved generating a calibrated material model for the polyethylene pellets via experimental testing to produce the required particle properties, particle-particle and particle-geometry interactions. The calibrated DEM material models and simulations have been based initially on the International standard for dustiness testing. Preliminary investigations of the drum dimensions, rotational speed, volume and location of initial product sample have been performed. The motion of particles in the simulated rotating drums have been compared with that seen in the experimental testing. It is hoped that the proposed simulation methods can provide an accurate way to replicate experimental dustiness testing, with the overall aim of understanding and minimising dust generation.

[1]  Andrew P Grima,et al.  Development and validation of calibration methods for discrete element modelling , 2011 .

[2]  Thomas Schneider,et al.  DOCUMENTATION OF A DUSTINESS DRUM TEST , 1996 .

[3]  Peter W Wypych,et al.  Validated computer simulation modelling for complete conveyor transfer design , 2008 .

[4]  Paul Cooper,et al.  Improving Dust-fume Control , 1995 .

[5]  Peter W Wypych,et al.  Discrete element simulations of granular pile formation: Method for calibrating discrete element models , 2011 .

[6]  EberhardSchmidt,et al.  METHODS FOR DUSTINESS ESTIMATION OF INDUSTRIAL POWDERS , 2005 .

[7]  Paul Zulli,et al.  An experimental and numerical study of the angle of repose of coarse spheres , 2002 .

[8]  Peter W Wypych,et al.  Investigation into calibration of discrete element model parameters for scale-up and validation of particle–structure interactions under impact conditions , 2011 .

[9]  Hiroshi Nakashima,et al.  Determining the angle of repose of sand under low-gravity conditions using discrete element method , 2011 .

[10]  Ian Lowndes,et al.  Assessment of the dustiness and the dust liberation mechanisms of limestone quarry operations , 2007 .

[11]  Fritz Ebert,et al.  Three-dimensional discrete element simulations in hoppers and silos , 2005 .

[12]  Lili ZhaoZhijun Zhang,et al.  Granular Mixing Characteristic 2D Simulation in Drum Dryer by DEM , 2012 .

[13]  David B Hastie,et al.  Belt conveyer transfers : quantifying and modelling mechanisms of particle flow , 2010 .

[14]  J. Bao,et al.  Numerical simulation of particle dynamics in different flow regimes in a rotating drum , 2007 .

[15]  Paul Cooper,et al.  Controlling dust emissions and explosion hazards in powder handling plants , 2005 .

[16]  Jennifer S. Curtis,et al.  Predicting the flow mode from hoppers using the discrete element method , 2009 .

[17]  Niels O. Breum,et al.  The rotating drum dustiness tester: Variability in dustiness in relation to sample mass, testing time, and surface adhesion , 1999 .

[18]  Paul W. Cleary,et al.  Comparison of DEM and experiment for a scale model SAG mill , 2003 .

[19]  P. Cleary,et al.  The influence of particle shape on flow modes in pneumatic conveying , 2011 .

[20]  Paul W. Cleary,et al.  Assessing mixing characteristics of particle-mixing and granulation devices , 2008 .