Effect of cell anisotropy on differentiation of stem cells on micropatterned surfaces through the controlled single cell adhesion.

Micropatterns of arginine-glycine-aspartic acid (RGD) on poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) hydrogels were fabricated. Under an appropriate size of microislands on this strong and persistent non-fouling background, single mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) from rats were well localized, keeping the same adhesive area but different shapes. The cell shapes influenced the differentiation of MSCs, and the osteogenic and adipogenic differentiations exhibited different trends. According to comparison between square and rectangular cells, optimal adipogenic differentiation occurred at aspect ratio (AR) 1, but the optimal osteogenic differentiation was found when AR was about 2. We further interpreted the optimal ratios as reflecting the inherent global anisotropy of free adipoblasts and osteoblasts on unpatterned culture plates. According to comparison between globally isotropic circular, square, triangular, and star cells, the optimal adipogenic and osteogenic differentiations happened in circular and star cells, respectively. In this case we found that extents of both adipogenic and osteogenic differentiations were linearly related to cell perimeter, which reflects the non-roundness or local anisotropy of cells. Hence, the present study makes semi-quantitative investigations of the effects of cell shape on differentiation of stem cells based on a material technique, and reveals that the shape anisotropy is very important in directing the lineage commitments of stem cells.

[1]  Horst Kessler,et al.  RGD modified polymers: biomaterials for stimulated cell adhesion and beyond. , 2003, Biomaterials.

[2]  Farshid Guilak,et al.  Nanotopography-induced changes in focal adhesions, cytoskeletal organization, and mechanical properties of human mesenchymal stem cells. , 2010, Biomaterials.

[3]  L. Blanchoin,et al.  Nucleation geometry governs ordered actin networks structures. , 2010, Nature materials.

[4]  Lin Gao,et al.  Stem Cell Shape Regulates a Chondrogenic Versus Myogenic Fate Through Rac1 and N‐Cadherin , 2010, Stem cells.

[5]  C. Wilkinson,et al.  The control of human mesenchymal cell differentiation using nanoscale symmetry and disorder. , 2007, Nature materials.

[6]  D. Ingber,et al.  Cellular tensegrity : defining new rules of biological design that govern the cytoskeleton , 2022 .

[7]  J. Jansen,et al.  The influence of nanoscale grooved substrates on osteoblast behavior and extracellular matrix deposition. , 2010, Biomaterials.

[8]  Murat Guvendiren,et al.  The control of stem cell morphology and differentiation by hydrogel surface wrinkles. , 2010, Biomaterials.

[9]  G. Whitesides,et al.  Patterning proteins and cells using soft lithography. , 1999, Biomaterials.

[10]  J. A. Hubbell,et al.  Optimization of photopolymerized bioerodible hydrogel properties for adhesion prevention. , 1994, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[11]  J. Folkman,et al.  Role of cell shape in growth control , 1978, Nature.

[12]  A. Asthagiri,et al.  Reprogramming Directional Cell Motility by Tuning Micropattern Features and Cellular Signals , 2010, Advanced materials.

[13]  Joachim P Spatz,et al.  Impact of order and disorder in RGD nanopatterns on cell adhesion. , 2009, Nano letters.

[14]  Jianguo Sun,et al.  Fabrication of micropatterns of nanoarrays on a polymeric gel surface. , 2010, Nanoscale.

[15]  Matthias P Lutolf,et al.  Micropatterning of hydrogels by soft embossing. , 2009, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[16]  Ravi A. Desai,et al.  Mechanical regulation of cell function with geometrically modulated elastomeric substrates , 2010, Nature Methods.

[17]  Avri Ben-Ze've Animal cell shape changes and gene expression , 1991 .

[18]  Daniel I. C. Wang,et al.  Engineering cell shape and function. , 1994, Science.

[19]  Jian Tang,et al.  The regulation of stem cell differentiation by cell-cell contact on micropatterned material surfaces. , 2010, Biomaterials.

[20]  R. Lal,et al.  Engineering the cell-material interface for controlling stem cell adhesion, migration, and differentiation. , 2011, Biomaterials.

[21]  Jacqueline A. Jones,et al.  Characterization of topographical effects on macrophage behavior in a foreign body response model. , 2010, Biomaterials.

[22]  David J. Mooney,et al.  Growth Factors, Matrices, and Forces Combine and Control Stem Cells , 2009, Science.

[23]  S. Ferguson,et al.  Surface patterning using plasma-deposited fluorocarbon thin films for single-cell positioning and neural circuit arrangement. , 2011, Biomaterials.

[24]  Yoshihiro Ito,et al.  A fusion protein N-cadherin-Fc as an artificial extracellular matrix surface for maintenance of stem cell features. , 2010, Biomaterials.

[25]  Q. Wang,et al.  The synergistic effects of multivalent ligand display and nanotopography on osteogenic differentiation of rat bone marrow stem cells. , 2010, Biomaterials.

[26]  Yilin Cao,et al.  The regulation of phenotype of cultured tenocytes by microgrooved surface structure. , 2010, Biomaterials.

[27]  Jason A Burdick,et al.  Patterning network structure to spatially control cellular remodeling and stem cell fate within 3-dimensional hydrogels. , 2010, Biomaterials.

[28]  Milan Mrksich,et al.  Geometric cues for directing the differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[29]  Q. Wang,et al.  Regulation of osteogenic differentiation of rat bone marrow stromal cells on 2D nanorod substrates. , 2010, Biomaterials.

[30]  Manuel Théry,et al.  The extracellular matrix guides the orientation of the cell division axis , 2005, Nature Cell Biology.

[31]  E. Place,et al.  Complexity in biomaterials for tissue engineering. , 2009, Nature materials.

[32]  Horst Kessler,et al.  Isothiocyanate-functionalized RGD peptides for tailoring cell-adhesive surface patterns. , 2008, Biomaterials.

[33]  Jeanne E. Pemberton,et al.  Air Stability of Alkanethiol Self-Assembled Monolayers on Silver and Gold Surfaces , 1998 .

[34]  Martin Bastmeyer,et al.  Microcontact printing of axon guidance molecules for generation of graded patterns , 2006, Nature Protocols.

[35]  Kristi S Anseth,et al.  The enhancement of chondrogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells by enzymatically regulated RGD functionalities. , 2008, Biomaterials.

[36]  Alexander Revzin,et al.  Using growth factor arrays and micropatterned co-cultures to induce hepatic differentiation of embryonic stem cells. , 2010, Biomaterials.

[37]  Jianguo Sun,et al.  Critical areas of cell adhesion on micropatterned surfaces. , 2011, Biomaterials.

[38]  Christopher S. Chen,et al.  Cell shape, cytoskeletal tension, and RhoA regulate stem cell lineage commitment. , 2004, Developmental cell.

[39]  Lin Yu,et al.  Effects of immobilizing sites of RGD peptides in amphiphilic block copolymers on efficacy of cell adhesion. , 2010, Biomaterials.

[40]  Cells response to topographic and chemical micropatterns. , 2008, Journal of applied biomaterials & biomechanics : JABB.

[41]  Lay Poh Tan,et al.  Micropatterned matrix directs differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells towards myocardial lineage. , 2010, Experimental cell research.

[42]  Robert L Sah,et al.  Probing the role of multicellular organization in three-dimensional microenvironments , 2006, Nature Methods.

[43]  Xinqiao Jia,et al.  Controlling the adhesion and differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells using hyaluronic acid-based, doubly crosslinked networks. , 2011, Biomaterials.

[44]  G. Blin,et al.  Nano-scale control of cellular environment to drive embryonic stem cells selfrenewal and fate. , 2010, Biomaterials.

[45]  J. Hunt Regenerative medicine: Materials in a cellular world. , 2008, Nature Materials.

[46]  David F. Williams On the mechanisms of biocompatibility. , 2008, Biomaterials.

[47]  Ryan C Bailey,et al.  The generation of biomolecular patterns in highly porous collagen-GAG scaffolds using direct photolithography. , 2011, Biomaterials.

[48]  M. Martins,et al.  The stability of self-assembled monolayers with time and under biological conditions. , 2010, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[49]  Jackie Y Ying,et al.  The effect of matrix stiffness on mesenchymal stem cell differentiation in a 3D thixotropic gel. , 2010, Biomaterials.

[50]  K. Nakazawa,et al.  Embryoid body culture of mouse embryonic stem cells using microwell and micropatterned chips. , 2011, Journal of bioscience and bioengineering.

[51]  M. Ferrari,et al.  Modulating cellular adhesion through nanotopography. , 2010, Biomaterials.

[52]  Yu-Li Wang,et al.  The regulation of traction force in relation to cell shape and focal adhesions. , 2011, Biomaterials.

[53]  Lin Yu,et al.  Biodegradable and thermoreversible PCLA-PEG-PCLA hydrogel as a barrier for prevention of post-operative adhesion. , 2011, Biomaterials.

[54]  Srivatsan Raghavan,et al.  Micropatterned dynamically adhesive substrates for cell migration. , 2010, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[55]  J. S. Park,et al.  The promotion of chondrogenesis, osteogenesis, and adipogenesis of human mesenchymal stem cells by multiple growth factors incorporated into nanosphere-coated microspheres. , 2011, Biomaterials.

[56]  C. S. Chen,et al.  Geometric control of cell life and death. , 1997, Science.

[57]  Weiliang Shu,et al.  Chondrogenic differentiation of human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells on polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA) scaffolds coated with PHA granule binding protein PhaP fused with RGD peptide. , 2011, Biomaterials.

[58]  N. Kawazoe,et al.  Adipogenic differentiation of individual mesenchymal stem cell on different geometric micropatterns. , 2011, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[59]  Xingyu Jiang,et al.  Directing cell migration with asymmetric micropatterns. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[60]  Judith M Curran,et al.  The guidance of human mesenchymal stem cell differentiation in vitro by controlled modifications to the cell substrate. , 2006, Biomaterials.

[61]  M. Textor,et al.  Surface engineering approaches to micropattern surfaces for cell-based assays. , 2006, Biomaterials.

[62]  Nanostructured magnetizable materials that switch cells between life and death. , 2007, Biomaterials.

[63]  Edmondo Battista,et al.  Cells preferentially grow on rough substrates. , 2010, Biomaterials.

[64]  J. Spatz,et al.  Technique of surface modification of a cell-adhesion-resistant hydrogel by a cell-adhesion-available inorganic microarray. , 2008, Biomacromolecules.

[65]  M. Alini,et al.  The osteogenic differentiation of human osteoprogenitor cells on Anodic-Plasma-Chemical treated Ti6Al7Nb. , 2011, Biomaterials.

[66]  Duncan Graham,et al.  Introducing dip pen nanolithography as a tool for controlling stem cell behaviour: unlocking the potential of the next generation of smart materials in regenerative medicine. , 2010, Lab on a chip.

[67]  Cao Xie,et al.  Design and synthesis of a potent peptide containing both specific and non-specific cell-adhesion motifs. , 2010, Biomaterials.

[68]  Pieter van Dokkum,et al.  The nature of , 2006 .

[69]  Manuel Théry,et al.  Cell distribution of stress fibres in response to the geometry of the adhesive environment. , 2006, Cell motility and the cytoskeleton.

[70]  Jiandong Ding,et al.  Periodically Discontinuous Induction of Bone Marrow Stem Cells toward Osteogenic Differentiation in Vitro , 2008, Biotechnology progress.

[71]  Rui Chen,et al.  Nanoscale definition of substrate materials to direct human adult stem cells towards tissue specific populations , 2010, Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine.

[72]  George M. Whitesides,et al.  Patterning Self-Assembled Monolayers: Applications in Materials Science , 1994 .

[73]  M. Théry,et al.  Micropatterning as a tool to decipher cell morphogenesis and functions , 2010, Journal of Cell Science.

[74]  Andrés J. García,et al.  Role of material-driven fibronectin fibrillogenesis in cell differentiation. , 2011, Biomaterials.

[75]  Krishnendu Roy,et al.  Unique biomaterial compositions direct bone marrow stem cells into specific chondrocytic phenotypes corresponding to the various zones of articular cartilage. , 2011, Biomaterials.

[76]  Hiroo Iwata,et al.  Cells immobilized on patterns printed in DNA by an inkjet printer. , 2011, Biomaterials.

[77]  Regina Luttge,et al.  The interaction between nanoscale surface features and mechanical loading and its effect on osteoblast-like cells behavior. , 2010, Biomaterials.

[78]  David F. Williams On the nature of biomaterials. , 2009, Biomaterials.

[79]  Ali Khademhosseini,et al.  A microwell array system for stem cell culture. , 2008, Biomaterials.

[80]  Bartosz A. Grzybowski,et al.  Directing cell motions on micropatterned ratchets , 2009 .

[81]  Yong Wang,et al.  Adhesion and proliferation of OCT-1 osteoblast-like cells on micro- and nano-scale topography structured poly(L-lactide). , 2005, Biomaterials.

[82]  P. Janmey,et al.  Tissue Cells Feel and Respond to the Stiffness of Their Substrate , 2005, Science.

[83]  K. Anseth,et al.  Small functional groups for controlled differentiation of hydrogel-encapsulated human mesenchymal stem cells. , 2008, Nature materials.

[84]  Christopher S. Chen,et al.  Emergence of Patterned Stem Cell Differentiation Within Multicellular Structures , 2008, Stem cells.