PRIMUM NON NOCERE: AVOIDING HARM TO VULNERABLE WAIT LIST CANDIDATES IN AN INDIRECT KIDNEY EXCHANGE

Background. One proposal to increase kidney transplantation is to exchange kidneys between pairs of ABO-incompatible (or cross-match–incompatible) living donors and their recipients. One variation that has greater potential exchanges living donor kidneys for cadaveric donor kidneys (indirect exchanges). A primary concern with indirect exchanges is the potential to disadvantage blood group O wait list candidates. Using wait list modeling, we examine whether this proposal would disadvantage cadaveric kidney blood group O wait list candidates, and present an approach for neutralizing these negative effects. Methods. A probability model estimated the total number and blood type frequencies of donor-recipient pairs that would participate in indirect exchanges. A supply-to-demand model for the cadaveric kidney wait list estimated the mean wait time under different allocation policies and donor selection mechanisms for candidates on the wait list classified according to the candidates’ race and blood type. Results. Indirect exchanges will reduce the mean wait time for cadaveric kidney wait list candidates. The mean wait time of blood group O cadaveric kidney wait list candidates increases when the participating living donors self-select and when kidney allocation is determined by efficiency. This is neutralized when the transplant team preferentially selects blood group O living donors and cadaveric kidney allocation is determined by need. Conclusion. Indirect exchange programs will significantly shorten the wait times for cadaveric kidney wait list candidates. The wait times of blood group O candidates will not be affected adversely if blood group O living donors are selected preferentially and if allocation is based on need.

[1]  M. Gold Cost-effectiveness in health and medicine , 2016 .

[2]  S. Donnelly,et al.  Gender disparity in living renal transplant donation. , 2000, American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation.

[3]  L. Ross,et al.  Ethical issues in increasing living kidney donations by expanding kidney paired exchange programs. , 2000, Transplantation.

[4]  A. Spital,et al.  Evolution of attitudes at U.S. transplant centers toward kidney donation by friends and altruistic strangers. , 2000, Transplantation.

[5]  P. Khajehdehi Living non-related versus related renal transplantation--its relationship to the social status, age and gender of recipients and donors. , 1999, Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association.

[6]  L. Wein,et al.  Evidence-based organ allocation. , 1999, The American journal of medicine.

[7]  Stefanos A. Zenios,et al.  Modeling the transplant waiting list: A queueing model with reneging , 1999, Queueing Syst. Theory Appl..

[8]  L. Ross,et al.  Paired exchanges should be part of the solution to ABO incompatibility in living donor kidney transplantation. , 1998, Transplantation.

[9]  S. Kim,et al.  Exchange donor program in kidney transplantation. , 1998, Transplantation.

[10]  L. Brigham,et al.  Analysis of donor versus nondonor demographics. , 1998, Journal of transplant coordination : official publication of the North American Transplant Coordinators Organization.

[11]  P I Terasaki,et al.  Paired kidney exchange is not a solution to ABO incompatibility. , 1998, Transplantation.

[12]  L. Ross,et al.  Ethics of a paired-kidney-exchange program. , 1997, The New England journal of medicine.

[13]  G. Magnusson,et al.  Reasons for not accepting living kidney donors. , 1996, Transplantation.

[14]  A. Spital Do U.S. transplant centers encourage emotionally related kidney donation? , 1996, Transplantation.

[15]  C. Callender,et al.  An assessment of the impact of the National Minority Organ Tissue Transplant Education Program. , 1996, Transplantation proceedings.

[16]  S Takemoto,et al.  High survival rates of kidney transplants from spousal and living unrelated donors. , 1995, The New England journal of medicine.

[17]  C. Callender,et al.  Organ donation in the African-American population: a fresh perspective with a simple solution. , 1993, Journal of the National Medical Association.

[18]  Hermann Lehmann,et al.  The ABO blood groups: comprehensive tables and maps of world distribution , 1959 .